DrDawkinstein Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Letting Edmunds walk was the right choice. Especially at his 4/$72M number. Bernard is a much more instinctual player than Edmunds will ever be. He just doesnt have the size to go with it. But at 4/$50M its a little easier to swallow. The good news is, we can get out of the Bernard contract pretty easily after 2026. And he isnt costing us a ton in the meantime. Still less than we're paying Samuel to be a healthy scratch. 1 Quote
corta765 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Edmunds was a better player overall then Bernard but wanted more money which he cashed in on and we wouldn't pay. Bernard was a good value signing with upside for what they wanted but he is a little lesser then Edmunds. From what I have read in Chicago he has been fine but people do think he is too expensive there and I won't be surprised if he gets cut in a year or two for cap reasons. 1 Quote
Brand J Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago None of you will convince me that “Edmunds was a better player than Bernard.” By what metric? He was certainly bigger and more athletic, but he didn’t exploit those attributes. He wasn’t physical. In one famous play, he had a full head of steam on a blitz and got stoned by a Patriots RB. I had never seen that before. All this talk about how he dissuaded QBs from throwing over the middle yet I have vivid memories of Edmunds standing there and chasing a completed pass within 5 yards of his zone. His awareness was putrid. If an OL got hands on him, it was over, he’d move backwards like he was on skates. In no universe was this gentle giant a better football player than Bernard. I’m not falling for that bull jive. Letting Edmunds go was the right move. The only question is was extending Bernard at 4/$50M the right move? 1 Quote
Charles Romes Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Edmunds got a max contract extension and Bernard got a solid starter extension. 🍎s to 🍊s. 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 24 minutes ago, corta765 said: Edmunds was a better player overall then Bernard but wanted more money which he cashed in on and we wouldn't pay. Bernard was a good value signing with upside for what they wanted but he is a little lesser then Edmunds. From what I have read in Chicago he has been fine but people do think he is too expensive there and I won't be surprised if he gets cut in a year or two for cap reasons. Yeah, Edmunds had some rough moments but like others have said, his presence in the middle of the field is sorely missed. Bernard makes his fair share of plays so when you factor in salary and production, they did make the right choice regardless of the player. Quote
Virgil Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Okay, I'm in the sky is falling section with most people, but even I'm not rethinking if it was a good idea to let Edmunds walk. Edmunds did not deserve the contract he got and had zero big play ability. Benford isn't playing great right now overall, but he is still making the occasional play. 1 Quote
RunTheBall Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Holy god do you guys remember how bad Edmunds was in the playoffs? Mahomes ABUSED him every time we played KC. The guy had elite traits and ZERO instincts as a LB. They wanted to run him out of Chicago his first 2 years. The Cover 1 myth that he was affecting the passing game so much yet had zero stats to show for it lingered for years. He’s not a bad dude, just not a good LB and he fleeced Chicago with that contract. 1 Quote
gobills404 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I’m glad they didn’t resign Edmunds, especially considering what he ended up getting paid. I do think it’s funny though how Bernard has somehow escaped the “plays too soft” allegations Edmunds received even though Bernard has a higher missed tackle rate and gets completely removed from the play every time an OL lays a finger on him. 1 1 Quote
corta765 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, Sojourner said: Yeah, Edmunds had some rough moments but like others have said, his presence in the middle of the field is sorely missed. Bernard makes his fair share of plays so when you factor in salary and production, they did make the right choice regardless of the player. Yep. And the defense is so out of whack right now I think guys like him and Benford who had been good to at times great are feeling it which is weighing them down. Outside of Oliver & Walker I am not sure anyone else has looked good and doing what they should and that has a domino effect on the roster. 1 1 Quote
poblano Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, Donuts and Doritos said: C.) Neither - get a big line backer who can stop the run & cover the pass. You forgot that also can rush the passer 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ And for the cheap🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ 1 Quote
Donuts and Doritos Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, poblano said: You forgot that also can rush the passer 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ And for the cheap🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ My bad. Yes, I wish to add those to the order as well Amazon if it isn't too late. And I need it delivered in the next 2 weeks. 😉 Quote
billsfan714 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago The Bears are actually worse than us in defensive rushing yards allowed per game, no I dont miss Edmunds. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Edmunds is a bum. When he’s a bum without a contract, Beane will sign him as a”mentor” or “locker room leader” or “essentially another coach” or whatever such nonsense gets attached here to Beane’s charity signings of “guys he knows” 1 Quote
BillsFooteball Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Bernard has been frustrating last year and half now with durability and play on the field, but Bernard’s 2023 was greater than all of Edmund’s years in Buffalo combined Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago (edited) Letting Edmunds walk was the right move. Especially since he wanted to test Free Agency and we'd have had to match or beat the offer Chicago made. Drafting his replacement in Bernard in the 3rd Round was the right move. Signing Edmunds' replacement to a long term deal, paying Bernard decent money was the *wrong move*. With how Bernard regressed in 2024 and how he's playing in 2025, the right move was to save that cap and Draft Bernard's replacement, like we did with Edmunds. It's insane to me after taking a step back last year that they rushed to extend him before they had to. I'd have definitely at the very least waited on seeing how his 2025 went before thinking about doing it. His play since 2024 is not difficultly replaced. Middle Linebacker is not a premium position. You can find a top MLB prospect without spending a 1st. Very possible you could have upgraded with a 2nd or 3rd and kept some money for upgrades elsewhere. Edited 6 hours ago by BillsFanForever19 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.