SectionC3 Posted Sunday at 01:41 PM Posted Sunday at 01:41 PM 11 minutes ago, SCBills said: Shavers actually looks like he can win in a real game against actual legit corners. Yes, we as fans tend to hype up similar type guys most years.. but they don’t have the speed & size Shavers has plus the release packages he’s put on tape. This guy was an Alabama commit out of HS for a reason and maybe just needed some time to put it together. With the staff/team openly talking about moving Keon around, that would leave Palmer as the only pure outside guy. Having Shavers as another size, speed outside guy makes a lot of sense. If in Beane I’m working the phones to see if there’s any interest for Samuel.. I don’t care we have to give him away at this point. Moore is the better slot backup for Shakir. Keon Palmer Shakir Moore Shavers That group just makes sense. A clear Top 3. Moore can return punts and kicks, while Shavers can provide ST coverage. If no trade can be had for Samuel, I’d carry 6 WR’s.. at least until guys come back off PUP/Suspensions and then re-evaluate. I agree completely. I initially entertained the idea of trying to trade Moore first, but he's a better roster fit the Samuel. At this point, it's hard to conceive of cutting Shavers, who has an exceptional work ethic, roster versatility, and threshold competence, for a guy (Samuel) with marginal production who can't stay on the field. 1 Quote
Jimmy Harris 69 Posted Sunday at 01:41 PM Posted Sunday at 01:41 PM I would love it if the bills could move Samuel for a late round pick to a team like the Vikes, that needs receivers. Unfortunately, there’s not much to recommend him since he’s been here. Let it be Moore. To keep Samuel, the bust and let Shavers get scooped by some other team would be the Billiest of Billsey moves. We want and need speed yet when we have it, we squander it. Come on Beane do the right thing. I know you read this garbage before bed or your man servant does. Quote
SectionC3 Posted Sunday at 01:42 PM Posted Sunday at 01:42 PM 24 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: Both Shavers and Coleman have been a bit inconsistent catching the ball but Coleman can absolutely make that catch. Correct. "A player cannot be placed on the PUP list, however, once he has taken the field for a practice or game." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physically_unable_to_perform Wrong. Joe Marino reported this morning that Samuel is being held out due to spleenal concerns. He also has some pelvic discomfort. I didn't know this about Shavers. The problem is Occam's. Occam's Shaver. Sounds like Samuel has mono. Maybe he's headed to IR. 2 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: All 3 are bad signings, they need to be cut today. Shenault especially. Stay in your friggin lane on KO coverage. He's gotta go. The only way I think he sticks around is if they play some roster games with returner and he's a PS elevation for the purpose of returner by band aid for the first couple of weeks. Quote
Walking Tall Posted Sunday at 03:47 PM Posted Sunday at 03:47 PM 12 hours ago, Billl said: On top of this, Shavers is also 26 years old. If he was a 22 year old second-year player, the calculus around him would be a little different. The question becomes how much are you ever going to get out of a 26 year old developmental guy. The list of WRs who have broken out after the age of 25 is short, and most of them have been shifty slots rather than “traits” guys. The one thing McDermott and Beane preach, particularly Beane, is developing and keeping your own. The Bills have put the time and effort into developing Shavers, regardless if he was on the PS or active roster (which he was last season). Now, do they keep him? I think so. 3 1 Quote
Charles Romes Posted Sunday at 03:53 PM Posted Sunday at 03:53 PM Similar to the Isaiah Hodgins dilemma Quote
Maynard Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM We need to keep a spot on the 53 for Shavers at this point. Let’s see what Allen can do with him. Quote
ChronicAndKnuckles Posted Sunday at 04:13 PM Posted Sunday at 04:13 PM 13 hours ago, KOKBILLS said: I don't start threads much...ever... But he has to make this team... Right? And look... Folks can talk about how he has to play ST's and all that, but... I watch an absolute TON of NFL football... The Bills are my favorite team... And I want to see Shavers catching balls from #17... Like...Actually as a part of this Offense... I think we need to see... We need to find out... Am I crazy?... If Shavers doesn’t make the roster then I have zero faith in McDermott’s “best man wins” philosophy. It will be a bad look for McD in front of his players. I think it is as close to 100% as you can get that he makes the roster. He’s making catches on every level of the field. I think Shavers could be special. Quote
ChronicAndKnuckles Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM Posted Sunday at 04:21 PM 12 hours ago, Dan said: Honestly… is there another WR on our roster that would make that catch? Shakir has made some pretty acrobatic catches himself. Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted Sunday at 04:31 PM Posted Sunday at 04:31 PM If Beane has to give up a late round pick to dump Samuel’s salary, I think that’s the right move. Then use the $4m in cap savings to sign vet DB or multiple vet DB’s. 1 1 Quote
boater Posted Sunday at 04:39 PM Posted Sunday at 04:39 PM Remember WR Duke Williams? Duke Williams had the same fan buzz around him after a training camp of big plays. He ended up bouncing around between the practice squad and the 53-man. He eventually landed in the CFL. Shavers could end up the same way, he is one of those cusp players. He will bounce around between the practice squad and the 53-man. I don't see him permanently part of the 53. There is no Shavers problem. 1 Quote
Kaenon Posted Sunday at 04:46 PM Posted Sunday at 04:46 PM Didn't he also draw 3 PI/holding penalties? 1 Quote
518Buffalo Posted Sunday at 04:52 PM Posted Sunday at 04:52 PM Something that makes me feel optimistic about Shavers making the 53 (in addition to his on-field performance) is that it seems unlikely to me that the Bills would roster 5 WR and NONE of them play special teams. In the past when they kept 6 Kumerow was a core STer. Harty, Crowder, Stevenson and Roberts took return duties (or were at least expected to when they made the roster). Maybe I’d make an exception if one of them was a developmental player. But unless they secretly expect Moore to be returning kicks it’s hard for me to see both Samuel and Moore as WR 4 and 5 and neither do anything on teams. Also, could Samuels “illness” have something to do with a trade in the works? Quote
VW82 Posted Sunday at 05:49 PM Posted Sunday at 05:49 PM Lots of talk about Shavers the WR but little about Shavers on teams which is interesting because presumably that would be his main role if he made it. Is the idea here that even though we like to play big with extra lineman and/or TEs, we're going to carry six WR this year? I kinda don't see it, especially with all these injuries heading into the season. We have enough guys that we won't want to stash on IR because they'll be back and so will need to make the team and just be inactive for a week or two. I'll admit that Shavers could quickly become top 4 the moment one of our actual top 4 gets hurt which seems likely with Samuel's track record, but that won't be the case heading into week one. 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted Sunday at 06:10 PM Posted Sunday at 06:10 PM 4 hours ago, Aesop said: Shavers can play special teams and catch passes from #17. He has actually excelled as a gunner on the punt team. There is a path to him making the 53, but imo it requires the Bills keeping 6 WR and Shavers having to play some Special Teams. Specials is his path. I don’t think there’s a Shavers problem. If his play on Specials warrants a spot - and I think it very well might - then he’ll make the team. If not, then he’s a cut as his play solely at WR does not warrant keeping him on the 53. If he’s cut then he’s likely a PS player. Quote
Success Posted Sunday at 06:18 PM Posted Sunday at 06:18 PM I love how he has played, but ultimately, this isn't some sort of make or break for the team. We're talking about a 5 or 6 guy in the WR corps (and the latter only if they keep 6, which is probably unlikely). I doubt they would trade Samuel to make room for him. Quote
Mister Defense Posted Sunday at 07:40 PM Posted Sunday at 07:40 PM 16 hours ago, KOKBILLS said: I don't start threads much...ever... But he has to make this team... Right? And look... Folks can talk about how he has to play ST's and all that, but... I watch an absolute TON of NFL football... The Bills are my favorite team... And I want to see Shavers catching balls from #17... Like...Actually as a part of this Offense... I think we need to see... We need to find out... Am I crazy?... Well, if you are on the bubble, as Shavers clearly seems to be, you want to catch everyone's attention one last time in the last pre-season game of the year--to make it as hard as possible for the Bills to not add him to the final roster. He made the catch of the game, of the preseason--and that is for all games this NFL pre season. (Someone said it was the best pre-season catch he ever saw.) Very difficult to not add him to the roster now. And watch him go to one of our competitors in the AFC and make an impact? And watch Samuels on the sidelines all year again? I think Shavers is on the final roster. If he does not come through, and he may not, they can always move him to the practice squad (true?), where he may then be safe. Quote
nuklz2594 Posted Sunday at 07:44 PM Posted Sunday at 07:44 PM Samuels...can't make the club from the tub. Dead money stinks. We ate ate diggs contract right? Shavers rooting for him 1 Quote
HamptonBillsfan Posted Sunday at 07:54 PM Posted Sunday at 07:54 PM 17 hours ago, KOKBILLS said: I don't start threads much...ever... But he has to make this team... Right? And look... Folks can talk about how he has to play ST's and all that, but... I watch an absolute TON of NFL football... The Bills are my favorite team... And I want to see Shavers catching balls from #17... Like...Actually as a part of this Offense... I think we need to see... We need to find out... Am I crazy?... Right now he looks like a vertical threat and a guy who can catch contested balls. He’s hungry and provides excellent depth. He’s going to make the roster barring a late acquisition of a veteran who will be a cap hit. I’m rooting hard for him. Quote
Pete Posted Sunday at 07:59 PM Posted Sunday at 07:59 PM Were keeping Shavers- Moore will be cut. Josh and Brady love Curtis. Not to mention Curtis has a speed skill set the Bills could use. Curtis is not going anywhere, now is Shavers Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.