Jump to content

Bills windows with Josh


JAX

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

If you come here daily to complain about McD maybe you should slam a window on your head. 

 

You might want to throw a j/k in there, so as to avoid being blamed later. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk of windows being nonexistent identifies posters that have no brain. Let me help the brainless (although I’d rather not):

 

Window — a period of time where peak roster construction is in place.

 

We were just in one but didn’t capitalize largely due to catastrophic injuries on defense. This topic is about how to adjust moving forward given that age and cap now disrupt our core roster moving forward.

 

Anyone with a brain that follows sports sees teams make aggressive moves when they’re close (e.g. us signing Von at his age and price). This is window behavior. The Von contract itself proves windows exist.
 

Windows exist. You dumbasses. 

 

 

Edited by dayman
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know where else to put this but we have the most clutch QB in the NFL:

 

But as the tweet says we also have the least clutch team in the NFL. Our window will officially be open whenever McDermott and Beane rise to the occasion or we find a better pair.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimBob2232 said:

We're watching one of the best QBs to EVER play the game.  Probably top 10-15 by the end of his career.   Enjoy it.  

If he’s the best qb ever, theres a ton of room for improvement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dayman said:

Talk of windows being nonexistent identifies posters that have no brain. Let me help the brainless (although I’d rather not):

 

Window — a period of time where peak roster construction is in place.

 

We were just in one but didn’t capitalize largely due to catastrophic injuries on defense. This topic is about how to adjust moving forward given that age and cap now disrupt our core roster moving forward.

 

Anyone with a brain that follows sports sees teams make aggressive moves when they’re close (e.g. us signing Von at his age and price). This is window behavior. The Von contract itself proves windows exist.
 

Windows exist. You dumbasses. 

 

 

Excuse me.  This is both wrong and inappropriate.  

 

The fact that a word has a definition - like the definition of window above, does not prove that windows exist or are a viable roster strategy.  Flat Earth is the concept that the earth is shaped like a disk, but the fact that there is a term for the concept doesn't prove the existence of that concept, either.  

 

The windows that you're talking about naturally occurring.  They occur by design of the GM, who tries to make their team succeed by acquiring a lot of talent, all arriving at the franchise at more or less the same time.  Modern NFL GMs rarely operate their team that way these days, because the draft and the salary cap work so well that it's essentially impossible to out-talent the rest of the league.  Baseball teams sometimes have tried to do it intentionally by tanking to accumulate multiple years of high first round picks, unloading talented veterans for more picks or just to stockpile money, then race to the top on the backs of young talent that the team won't re-sign to monster contracts.   It just isn't an effective model in the NFL.

 

One place where it happens occasionally is when the team hits on a rookie QB who is so good so young that the team has a window with a lot of cap room.   But that doesn't happen very often.  

 

The Bills signing Von Miller was not window behavior, because Von Miller was signed to a long-term contract that was designed to give the Bills a great edge for at least three years and as much as six.  That's building a team, not loading up on talent for the short-run.  Beyond that, the notion of "window behavior" is bogus.  What you're talking about is behavior like the Rams acquiring Miller the year before or signing OBJ.  That doesn't mean the Rams had a strategy based on windows and rebuilds.  The Rams expect to be good year after year.  All those signing represented was something that Beane says he would do, too, which is that if the team is having a good regular season run and looks like it could win it all, then he'll do whatever he can to get additional talent on the team.  So, for example, when the Bills were 6-6, Beane was not going to run out and get a special player on a one-year (or less) rental.  If they're 10-2 next season, he might.  

 

The Bills have been built, intentionally, to compete for championships every year, year after year, and to reload talent in such a way that the team doesn't have peaks and valleys with talent.  That is exactly what McBeane described when they first got to Buffalo. 

 

What's worse than the fact that you were wrong, however, is your attitude and the tone with which you address the rest of us.  We are not "brainless" (far from it) and we are not "dumbasses."    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

Why are the Chiefs able to have Mahomes, Kelce, Jones etc but they’re not in “salary cap hell” 

 

I don’t get it

The Bills are not in salary cap hell.   The salary cap is a collection of rules that GMs have learned to manage in ways that preserve their ability to sign new talent every year.   The rules require certain accountings, and depending on the time of year that we look at the accounting, some teams look like they're in better position than others.   However, if the GM of your team knows what he's doing, he always has the room he needs to make the kind of moves he needs to make.  Beane knows what he's doing.  

 

Now, in some years will a team have more cap room than others?   Sure, but the cap properly managed, every year there's enough room to manage the roster properly.  Beane has been clear that he will not mortgage the future, because his objective is to be good every season, not to overspend on talent because he thinks the Bills are in a window.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ddaryl said:

There is no reason to believe we only have a 3-5 year window with Josh. I see no reason why Josh can not continue to play at a high enough level till he's 40 years old barring major injury(s). He's proven to be durable, as well as a damn QB who continues to break records.

I hope your right but QBs that play like Josh don't last playing at a high level past 35. We seen Cam break down at 30. So unless Josh changes his game and becomes more of a pocket passer it's more then likely he won't play till 38-40 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bills!Win! said:

Why are the Chiefs able to have Mahomes, Kelce, Jones etc but they’re not in “salary cap hell” 

 

I don’t get it

They play their rookies instead of bringing in vets that will keep them on the bench. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

W 59 L25  past 5 seasons says it all.   When you're winning 7 out of 10 games I am a happy guy.   They'll get the breaks/stay healthy enough to get through the silly TV $$ driven single elimination tournament once or twice I suppose.  Don't really care when it is.   Give me a consistent winning program and that goes a long way.   You'll get your SB tee shirt at some point.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NastyNateSoldiers said:

I hope your right but QBs that play like Josh don't last playing at a high level past 35. We seen Cam break down at 30. So unless Josh changes his game and becomes more of a pocket passer it's more then likely he won't play till 38-40 

 

 

What happened to Cam wasn't because he was running to much. He actually hurt his shoulder trying to make a tackle after throwing an INT

Josh could get injured and fall off a cliff, its possible, but he has also proven to be quite durable. I view Josh as a QB who play well into his 30s, but no there is never a guarentee in football.

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 26TrapDraw said:

Wish I shared your enthusiasm. We are in salary csp hell and there needs to be several moves made before this team can get over the hump and compete.

 

The perception that you have to have a bunch of high priced guys to win the SB is false.  Draft develop and be careful/judicial about how many guys you re-sign.  The flaw with this team is they think they have to re-sign everyone they draft and contributes

 

The whole "window" term is manufactured by the loud mouths on TV and internet and so overused and then the fans use it excessively like its a thing with all teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Aussie Joe said:


They have got 18 of their 22 starters under contract for 2024  ( 19 if you include Miller)…

 

The other ones missing are Davis, Hyde and DQJ….

 

Yes there is work to be done, and Beane needs to have a good offseason … the DL and Safety positions need to be reworked to the same extent he did last year with the OL…

 

But they still have a lot of good pieces in place, and I’d be expecting them once again to be the heavyweights of the division and knocking on the 1 seeds door for 2024 …

 

 

that's a really good point to emphasize.

 

we are in an awful cap/contract situation.  the upside i keep blabbing about is that the guys we will lose don't really have a big impact anymore, so we can afford to lose them.  losing out some guys on D which gave up 7.7 a play and a forced one single punt in the divisional round, same guys who got trucked by cinci at home last year, well, i think we can give up 7.7 with a bunch of rooks and some cheapo fa guys, heck maybe even 7.5!

 

we are also down our starting wr who didn't even play, was involved in a shocking % of allen's picks (particular on a per target basis) and who had 2 or less catches in what, half the games of the year or something?

 

if we can get production out of williams, elam, and von, and not lose milano and our top 3 (4?) corners we are a better d than we've had in the playoffs ever, and we will exceed that if we get some good rookie production too.

 

on O, we need 2 or 3 guys who are better than davis (who wasn't playing, so trivially possible), harty, and sherf.  haines coming back might be better in passing than the last two and a rookie who can play or two can round that out.

 

mcd has to learn his lesson, but i think there are signs he is learning.  

 

knox finding health and diggs not falling off a cliff are also our opportunities to excel.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...