TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Now that the dust has settled, I’ve really looked at the statistical production of some of our guys. I knew Shakir had a good year, then I really looked at his production. He had a PHENOMENAL year. 39 catches and 2 TDs are decent numbers for a ‘#3 WR,’ but can we talk about his 86% catch rate? That is outstanding. Caught 10 of 12 in the playoffs for 2 more TDs as well. 282 Yards after catch? Love it. 15+ yards per reception. 133 QBR when targeted. Ready for this? 45 targets. Zero interceptions when Allen looked his way. 57 targets when you add in the postseason. Still zero INTS. Fifty Seven targets. Zero drops. Zero. ZERO. Bills were in the bottom of the drop statistic this season. I don’t think Shakir should come off the field. He’s the slot WR and should be the #2 WR target. I’d love data on if he lined up outside when the team went to 2 WR sets after Gabe’s injury, or if he came off the field. Shakir has shown BIG TIME potential, and it’s the little things that hint to it. Thoughts? 🦬 1 4 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 His role should definitely be expanded, but it's hard to just stretch that out assuming that if he was targeted that much more often nothing would change. You become that much more of a focused weapon on the team and other teams are going to focus on taking you away. Him and Kincaid will need an expanded role in the offense and they need to address the position in the offseason. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Matter_What Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 He needs to be amazing WR3 and then this offense combined with OL we had this year and KingCaid as TE1 will be best we ever had. Just draft WR round 1 this year and hit on him. But agreed, Shakir was great especially second half of the season. Love that guy. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mabden Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Shakir is our slot receiver that can line up outside on occasion. The team needs a burner with great hands to challenge the defense down the field on a consistent basis. That receiver is currently not on the team. We should be able to draft one in the first round this year. 6 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Yes. DIggs. Too bad the WR1 isn't. 10 6 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruffalo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 He has the makings of a star slot receiver. We still need a 1A/B to push Diggs down to 1/B or 2. 6 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Better eat his Wheaties. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 This would be Josh Reed becoming the number 2 after Price left. Shakir could put up really good numbers next year but he doesn’t have the attributes to threaten a defense enough as a number 2. He would get clamped on the outside by most corners. Hes absolutely perfect in his role. Let’s get a legit threat in the draft. 2 9 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Warcodered said: His role should definitely be expanded, but it's hard to just stretch that out assuming that if he was targeted that much more often nothing would change. You become that much more of a focused weapon on the team and other teams are going to focus on taking you away. Him and Kincaid will need an expanded role in the offense and they need to address the position in the offseason. Definitely, we saw it with Gabe. Showed flashes, but couldn’t step up with an increased role. It’s nice to see the areas that we needed Davis to step up in (catch rate, drops, INTs when targeted) are Shakirs best qualities. If the Bills wheeled him out on 2 WR sets opposite of Diggs, I wouldn’t be shocked if a WR someplace between Sherfield and Davis was brought in that could challenge the defenses vertically. If Sherfield showed better hands, I would’ve said he was a shoe in that role in 2024. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptnCoke11 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Good slot receiver he’s for sure. #2 option outside I don’t think his skill set is a good match for that. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 minutes ago, Bruffalo said: He has the makings of a star slot receiver. We still need a 1A/B to push Diggs down to 1/B or 2. Exactly. He's the Beasley replacement. Diggs is the Brown/Sanders replacement. Still one missing. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, C.Biscuit97 said: This would be Josh Reed becoming the number 2 after Price left. Shakir could put up really good numbers next year but he doesn’t have the attributes to threaten a defense enough as a number 2. He would get clamped on the outside by most corners. Hes absolutely perfect in his role. Let’s get a legit threat in the draft. There is no comparison between Josh Reed and Shakir. Reed was a very limited WR physically and never hit 600 yards in a season, never caught more than 71% of his passes. I get what you’re trying to say though. Shakir’s ceiling remains to be seen, but it could be higher than we all anticipated. At the very least Shakir should be the starting slot WR next year and Allen’s 3rd passing option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaMilBill Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, transient said: Exactly. He's the Beasley replacement. Diggs is the Brown/Sanders replacement. Still one missing. Agree. Need a big body speedster that can actually catch 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 (edited) 10 minutes ago, transient said: Exactly. He's the Beasley replacement. Diggs is the Brown/Sanders replacement. Still one missing. Beasley was the #2 WR on the team, the slot WR can be the #2. Who ever takes Gabe’s spot on the field is probably the 4th option next year. **Edit** And I would love that 4th option to be a WR drafted to eventually replace Mr Diggs. Edited January 26 by TheyCallMeAndy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Shakir is going to be a stud WR3, our own Tyler Boyd or Donovan Peoples-Jones. Not sure how he will work when he starts drawing more coverage. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) 20 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Now that the dust has settled, I’ve really looked at the statistical production of some of our guys. I knew Shakir had a good year, then I really looked at his production. He had a PHENOMENAL year. 39 catches and 2 TDs are decent numbers for a ‘#3 WR,’ but can we talk about his 86% catch rate? That is outstanding. Caught 10 of 12 in the playoffs for 2 more TDs as well. 282 Yards after catch? Love it. 15+ yards per reception. 133 QBR when targeted. Ready for this? 45 targets. Zero interceptions when Allen looked his way. 57 targets when you add in the postseason. Still zero INTS. Fifty Seven targets. Zero drops. Zero. ZERO. Bills were in the bottom of the drop statistic this season. I don’t think Shakir should come off the field. He’s the slot WR and should be the #2 WR target. I’d love data on if he lined up outside when the team went to 2 WR sets after Gabe’s injury, or if he came off the field. Shakir has shown BIG TIME potential, and it’s the little things that hint to it. Thoughts? 🦬 I’ve been saying this…but hopefully the stats here will start making people listen Good post, and yes our #2 target is already on this team between him and Kincaid. People don’t understand the difference between WR2 and the #2 WR. WR2 is a boundary WR, but they doesn’t mean he has to be your second best or most targeted WR. Hill was #1 WR in KC but Kelce a TE was their #2. Edited January 26 by Alphadawg7 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 In a perfect world, Diggs transitions to a 2 this year and we hit on a new 1 in the draft 3 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Just now, TheyCallMeAndy said: Beasley was the #2 WR on the team, the slot WR can be the #2. Who ever takes Gabe’s spot on the field is probably the 4th option next year. So Shakir as WR2 and Diggs as WR3? That has locker room distraction written all over it... In general, I get and agree with your point, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaB Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 No 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILBillsfan Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Keeping Shakir in the slot option as his primary seems the correct role atm and next year some expanded roles possibly on the outside. I deally the new outside guy would be a rookie and then a vet in the lower pay range. I do not think this should stop the Bills looking at WR as their top priority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.