Dunkirk Donski Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 2 hours ago, Xwnyer said: sure looking that way especially on the Defense if I recall we were playing 4 Men that came up from Rochester I wonder if Jeff Jillson can cover Kelce 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubes Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 hour ago, RyanC883 said: did we go after Rudolph, like send enough guys? The Steelers OL is a bit underrated. Looked like we rushed 4 most of the game, but I'm not sure (had to "watch" the second half on the radio while driving kids to lax practice). I worry about giving Mahomes too much time. But a coverage sack could work. Perhaps some delayed blitzes where we drop Williams, then send him? The Bills blitzed only eight times in 44 dropbacks (per the Buffalo News). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 minute ago, Rubes said: The Bills blitzed only eight times in 44 dropbacks (per the Buffalo News). yep and didn't Buffalo give the NFL the Chiefs blueprint a few years ago by not blitzing Mahommes at all? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordong Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 6 minutes ago, wjag said: yep and didn't Buffalo give the NFL the Chiefs blueprint a few years ago by not blitzing Mahommes at all? yes... along with two safey's high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 11 hours ago, Brand J said: Chiefs fans say the Raiders ran a 5-2-4 and beat up their OL all game. They don’t think Buffalo has the horses up front to replicate that success, namely one Maxx Crosby. Then use more DTs and get your hands up to bat passes down. The Bills couldn't get Rudolph on the ground. Clearly their OTs are the weakest links of their offensive line. 14 minutes ago, wjag said: yep and didn't Buffalo give the NFL the Chiefs blueprint a few years ago by not blitzing Mahommes at all? Just play off every WR 29-yards. That should work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordong Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 7 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: Then use more DTs and get your hands up to bat passes down. The Bills couldn't get Rudolph on the ground. Clearly their OTs are the weakest links of their offensive line. Just play off every WR 29-yards. That should work. yeah because the bills haven't won 3 of the last 4 time they have played.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 (edited) I think Taron being limited is a good sign... I think that means he is fairly far along in the concussion protocol. Edited January 17 by HappyDays 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubes Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 (edited) 6 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I think Taron being limited is a good sign... I think that means he is fairly far along in the concussion protocol. Man, this is going to be a nail-biting week. Having Douglas, Dodson, and Johnson back would be fantastic. If they're the only three we get back, that still really helps. Would really like to see Benford and Rapp back as well, if possible—anything to keep Lewis and Elam on the sidelines as much as possible. I doubt we'll see Bernard, but man that would be great if he could go. Edited January 17 by Rubes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Ty Johnson was limited all last week in concussion protocol and cleared before the weekend. That's promising to see with Taron Johnson. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 2 hours ago, drummernut74 said: Will Jordan Phillips be active this week? He has now served the 4 games on IR They would either need to cut someone or put someone on IR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drummernut74 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, Limeaid said: They would either need to cut someone or put someone on IR. McD just said his situation hasn't changed. Doesn't sound like he's ready to be activated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, Limeaid said: They would either need to cut someone or put someone on IR. "Hey Von, how's the knee, it looks like you took a bad hit at practice today" "What are you talking about?" "Look, either it's the easy way or we Kerrigan you" 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Dunkirk Donski said: I wonder if Jeff Jillson can cover Kelce He would good at hitting him in the first 5 yards of line of scrimmage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 26 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I think Taron being limited is a good sign... I think that means he is fairly far along in the concussion protocol. Yup...stage 3 or 4 of the protocol... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc11 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 (edited) 19 hours ago, Drew21PA said: Why do people exaggerate and make stuff up i. Sure it hurt a lot worse being that cold but I didn’t see anything “bad” on the fall I agree. Hearing people say his leg was hanging, broke in half, etc... when I saw it I just thought he rolled his ankle Edited January 17 by Herc11 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zevo Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Dunkirk Donski said: I wonder if Jeff Jillson can cover Kelce that name still haunts me as a sabres fan. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiracleAtRich1393 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 42 minutes ago, Rubes said: Man, this is going to be a nail-biting week. Having Douglas, Dodson, and Johnson back would be fantastic. If they're the only three we get back, that still really helps. Would really like to see Benford and Rapp back as well, if possible—anything to keep Lewis and Elam on the sidelines as much as possible. I doubt we'll see Bernard, but man that would be great if he could go. Worst part about 2 less days' rest than KC, seems like with an extra day or two a lot of these guys could be back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Stadium Original Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 I think what can make some of these personnel calls tough on game day is not only can player X start, but how durable will they be, and at what % of healthy level are the playing at? Probably the last thing you want to do is tie up a game day roster spot, and somebody's ankle swells up after just one series, and they have to come out..now you've put a lot of pressure on their limited backups who may also be filling a special teams slot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo1105 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 49 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I think Taron being limited is a good sign... I think that means he is fairly far along in the concussion protocol. Weird a bunch of people told me I was a fool that Bernard could possibly play this week after it was announced it was a sprain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 6 minutes ago, MiracleAtRich1393 said: Worst part about 2 less days' rest than KC, seems like with an extra day or two a lot of these guys could be back So you are calling for roads closed day and a Monday playoff game again? 2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: Weird a bunch of people told me I was a fool that Bernard could possibly play this week after it was announced it was a sprain. Usually when they call you a fool they think you are like them and think it is a complement. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.