Jump to content

Tyler Dunne story on McDermott - 3 parts, 25 interviews, one damning conclusion


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

I mean if the point of this article is that McDermott is a control freak with an ego, I'd be more interested in the number of NFL head coaches who aren't. 🤷‍♂️

 

Belichick has been a "my way or the highway" grouch his entire career. But he had Brady for 20 years, and won a maddening amount of games/championships, so everyone put up with it. 

 

If McDermott had a championship or two under his belt by now, no one would care how controlling or egotistical or micro-managing he was.

 

The problem isn't that McDermott is running the team his way-or-the-highway. A head coach is responsible for the whole team, and that's his prerogative...

 

The problem is that his way isn't leading to trophies and rings, despite having a top 3 quarterback. But yeah I don't really consider this article to be "news" per se. It's just what you might assume about most NFL head coaches. 

 

I mean if McDermott was super nice and never fired anyone would the 6-6 record be somehow more palatable? lol

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roundybout said:

A lot of these quotes do sound like sources who were fired and are still jaded. 

Or they are just saying what happened, the truth is in the middle somewhere, that we all know, 

Edited by Don Otreply
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pocoboy said:

This stuff was clear as day for anyone who isn't enamored with meager playoff football. McDermott's narrative sculpting? Maybe he's hiring one of his various puff piece supporters in the media to help him with that. Or maybe he's just made a career of taking credit for everything good and shucking the blame onto others once they tire of his feel good clapping and locker room cliches.

 

I'd have to believe one of those sources might be QB1 himself. It's pretty clear this season is a throwdown dragout between McDermott & Allen. Allen's the only guy that's gonna wedge between McDermott and Pegula. So it's pretty transparent when McDermott, as soon as the Jets 2nd half meltdown hits, he's going after the source of the lack of "complementary football."

 

Bottom line - this team is 6-6, and it may be more dysfunctional than all those Drought Era teams that needed the big "culture change" McDermott sold.

 

Never really thought about the Jets game this way because it's such an outlier for Allen - by far the worst game he's played since he was a rookie. Was that a message, like when there were rumors of Hank Bullough getting fired with another loss and Bruce Smith telling the d huddle "I catch one of you ****er****ers making a tackle, I'm gonna kill you"

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, boyst said:

 

See my quote above

That is a very specific lie. Lies in stories are either completely fabricated or too specific with a manufactured backstory. That passes my sniff test of truth but the accuracy could always be off - as a joke. McChump could have said in a joking manner that his OL needs to be tough and not wearing Jordans. They should be wearing cowboy boots, and carharrts, and drive f650's, and dip Redman... All in a analogic metaphor. 

whatever it was, it's a nothing burger. He probably was just trying to set a theme and building some kind of unity with the linemen. Maybe it didn't work, but he probably meant well enough. 

 

I want him fired, but this is just a dumb anecdote to add 150 words to a story, and somehow people get bent out of shape about it, as if McD acts like a corrections officer with his players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Arkady Renko said:

Dorsey was a pretty natural pick.  You often promote from within for a successful offense.  Allen pushed  hard for him. 

 

Right, but still McD's pick.  

 

Otherwise, why is Allen choosing the OC.  

 

It's rhetorical, but anyone that isn't in a state of denial fully realizes that McDoesn'tKnow doesn't know offense, and that if it ever came down to a popularity contest between him and Allen, he wouldn't stand a chance, in any way, shape, or form.  He's catering to Allen.  

 

It's also my position that the reason why he won't hire a noted OC capable of making this offense run on all 8 cylinders optimally, is that he doesn't want to be replaced by that person after his defenses continue to fail us in the playoffs while the offense shines.  That position is very much in line with this piece by Dunne.  

 

And BTW, Dunne is typically incredibly well researched.  He doesn't just float garbage for clicks as some have speculated.  

 

Either way and no matter how much it's discussed and dissected, it's a dysfunctional mess right now.  

 

McD came first.  Then Allen.  

 

McD wouldn't even be here right now had Allen not skyrocketed in terms of performance in 2020.  He was already taking "hotseat" heat after 2019 and out playoffs debacle there.  

 

Had Allen been here before McD was, not a chance that McD would have landed the job.  

 

And now this nonsense with Von Miller.  As O'Halloran said in his piece, Pegula just fired two people for having a sincere and normal relationship with one another within the organization.  But he's endorsing Von Miller playing.  The hypocrisy reeks.  

 

That befalls McD and his "character" mantra as well.  

 

He's a dead-man walking, it's just a matter of how long Pegs keeps him around.  Beane's in no position to fire him on his own.  He'll likely be the one that delivers the pink-slip, but he's not going to stab the guy that gave him the job under the unlikeliest of circumstances.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, yall said:

That is so absurd. It can't be true right?

 

Because if it is.... 

It reads more like a joke taken in seriously there's no context other than the short blurb.

 

Like I could say that to someone off the cuff for a laugh.  "How can you guys wear Jordans?  You guys are the heavy equipment movers, I want boots and carthart. LOL"

 

I'm not defending it, just seems like we have 0 context and I honestly want to read the other stuff more than this small excerpt.

Edited by bouds
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

If everything said in this piece about McD is true, then no way he just decides to give up what he wants and let's Brady run loose.

 

Dorsey sucked as an OC. It doesnt need to go deeper than that.

 

Dorsey is gone. That problem has been addressed. On to the next issue: Head Coach.

 

Now, with two excellent games of offense in the books, have you reconsidered your analysis of this?

 

It seems Brady is doing his things, as he wants to, and yes, implementing the things McD has wanted, but in a dramatically better way than Dorsey ever could--running the ball, making it not just something to do on occasion but as integral part of the game, using their personnel better, being dramatically better at the details of game planning (and execution of those details), and using the entire field, including what was a barren wasteland under Dorsey, the entire middle, including throwing the ball to the backs... etcetera

 

Don't you like the immediate and dramatic turn around in the offense, into a creative, diverse, and dramatically less predictable and more productive offense? It seems McD got exactly what he wanted and now we'll see if it continues. I think it will and become more creative, more diverse.

 

I just wish McD had insisted on the OC following his philosophy more last year--and then fired him before the season when he realized Dorsey either could not or would not (and I lean heavily to could not). Huge mistake, and yeah that is on McDermott. 

 

And I think McD insisted on similar changes after the 7-6 start two years ago, as that is what happened, with the bills running game becoming the best in the league after that and Singletary at the top of the league.  Those changes too had McD's handprints all over it, and a very good thing too, just like this year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Mister Defense
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bouds said:

It reads more like a joke taken in seriously but there's no context other than the short blurb.

 

Like I could say that to someone off the cuff for a laugh.  "How can you guys wear Jordans?  You guys are the heavy equipment movers, I want boots and carthart. LOL"

 

I'm not defending it, just seems like we have 0 context and I honestly want to read the other stuff more than this small excerpt.

full quote

 

One ex-player recalls McDermott getting upset that the offensive linemen wore Jordans on Saturday walkthroughs because Jordans didn’t seem very lineman to him. Didn’t seem tough. He preferred the big men on his offensive line walk around the facility in work boots and Carhartt jackets. When players were upset about this edict, center Mitch Morse actually drew a Jordan logo on one of his shark cowboy boots. One source cited an assistant coach with kids who’d typically arrive for offseason hours about five minutes early (7:55 a.m.) and leave no more than five minutes late (4:05 p.m.) simply to help out as much as he could back home as a father. McDermott, quite perturbed, decided to add an hour to the workday. In his mind, if his coaches weren’t going to give him the “extra,” he was going to get the “extra” out of them. He started requiring coaches to stay from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., instead of 8 to 4. Even if there was a chance he wasn’t so punctual himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buddy Hix said:

13 secs exposed McD's inability to be accountable, I knew it would turn out like this...right down to Pegula being unwilling to do what is needed. The next 2-3 seasons are going to be rough, and I bet it will take at least that many years for Pegula to actually make the right call.

It still bothers me that they never came out and said exactly what happened. However, dismissing the ST coach says it all. Scapegoat or guilty? We'll never know. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

Right, but still McD's pick.  

 

Otherwise, why is Allen choosing the OC.  

 

It's rhetorical, but anyone that isn't in a state of denial fully realizes that McDoesn'tKnow doesn't know offense, and that if it ever came down to a popularity contest between him and Allen, he wouldn't stand a chance, in any way, shape, or form.  He's catering to Allen.  

 

It's also my position that the reason why he won't hire a noted OC capable of making this offense run on all 8 cylinders optimally, is that he doesn't want to be replaced by that person after his defenses continue to fail us in the playoffs while the offense shines.  That position is very much in line with this piece by Dunne.  

 

And BTW, Dunne is typically incredibly well researched.  He doesn't just float garbage for clicks as some have speculated.  

 

Either way and no matter how much it's discussed and dissected, it's a dysfunctional mess right now.  

 

McD came first.  Then Allen.  

 

McD wouldn't even be here right now had Allen not skyrocketed in terms of performance in 2020.  He was already taking "hotseat" heat after 2019 and out playoffs debacle there.  

 

Had Allen been here before McD was, not a chance that McD would have landed the job.  

 

And now this nonsense with Von Miller.  As O'Halloran said in his piece, Pegula just fired two people for having a sincere and normal relationship with one another within the organization.  But he's endorsing Von Miller playing.  The hypocrisy reeks.  

 

That befalls McD and his "character" mantra as well.  

 

He's a dead-man walking, it's just a matter of how long Pegs keeps him around.  Beane's in no position to fire him on his own.  He'll likely be the one that delivers the pink-slip, but he's not going to stab the guy that gave him the job under the unlikeliest of circumstances.  

 

 


He is well-sourced.  Also very biased.  See his work on Aaron Rodgers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JohnNord said:


This is where the “meddling” narrative never made sense.  If he is so controlling, wouldn’t he micromanage Joe Brady the same way he “micromanaged” Dorsey?  


I don’t buy that Dorsey was a scapegoat at all.  We saw 6 weeks where the offense struggled badly.  Over the past two weeks, it’s looked better.

I have strong inkling that McDermott called those awful one yard run plays on first down in OT to Murray that just wasted downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, boyst said:

copy and paste the link to the removepaywall.com site and it lets you do the full thing and click at the bottom to page two and 3

 

Normally I use the bypass paywalls clean extension but that doesnt work on substack.

 

Tried using your link not working for me.  Insert Part 2/3 urls and still seems locked out.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...