Sestak4ever Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Per Shefter Chris Jones has agreed to a deal with the Chiefs 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 All it took was an ass kicking. 1 1 5 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba Gump Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 minute ago, Warcodered said: All it took was an ass kicking. Exactly. Stinks of desperation after 1 week. Without Kelce and Jones, the Queefs are an average team. They still have nothing at WR. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 2 minutes ago, Bubba Gump said: Exactly. Stinks of desperation after 1 week. Without Kelce and Jones, the Queefs are an average team. They still have nothing at WR. This is definitely an overreaction after week 1. But we all knew that they have a bad group of receivers. They better hope Kelce recovers and doesn't get hurt again. And the Chiefs defense seems to always struggle for a decent part of the season before putting all the pieces together later on. But that is WITH Chris Jones, so who knows? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 (edited) Sounds like he caved. Edited September 11 by Warcodered 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 17 minutes ago, Warcodered said: All it took was an ass kicking. 21-20 is an ass kicking ? KC's defense actually played very well all things considered. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Smith Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Well he witnessed the asswhooping live first hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sestak4ever Posted September 11 Author Share Posted September 11 Actually thought the KC offensive looked weak against the Lions. I think that could prove to be a problem going forward. Offensive line 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCofNC Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 7 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Sounds like he caved. Apparently he had somebody explain the math to him. Still a one year deal is idiotic on his part, unless it included a no franchise tag clause. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsPride12 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 2 minutes ago, Sestak4ever said: Actually thought the KC offensive looked weak against the Lions. I think that could prove to be a problem going forward. Offensive line Aidan Hutchinson might have had something to do with that...I wouldn't expect the Chiefs O-Line to look like that every week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Normally a protracted hold out means pulled hammy or soft tissue injury is coming up soon. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyBills Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 32 minutes ago, Sestak4ever said: Actually thought the KC offensive looked weak against the Lions. I think that could prove to be a problem going forward. Offensive line Yea alot of ppl were saying get rid of Jones, invest in the O. Their d looked fine Detroit is nice and they get Jameson Williams back in week 7 which is big Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikePJ76 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 42 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Sounds like he caved. NFL Players always cave that is why their union is weak. They have all the power and always cave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 50 minutes ago, Sestak4ever said: Actually thought the KC offensive looked weak against the Lions. I think that could prove to be a problem going forward. Offensive line The Lions' offense was also pretty bad. Goff missed a lot of throws. I'm amazed they still won. 47 minutes ago, DCofNC said: Apparently he had somebody explain the math to him. Still a one year deal is idiotic on his part, unless it included a no franchise tag clause. Yeah I'm thinking it includes that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetermansRedemption Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 The defense is not the current problem in KC. The practice squad level receivers are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 hour ago, Warcodered said: Sounds like he caved. Agreed. Pretty weak holdout! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limeaid Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 42 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: Normally a protracted hold out means pulled hammy or soft tissue injury is coming up soon. Or plantars fakeitis until they reach playoffs when with game bonuses it will be all better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 He was getting fined like crazy for holding out. Was gonna make 18 mil so I’d imagine he got like 7-9 mil more this year. Kelce is the one that is criminally underpaid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDingus Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 This is going to be the worst decision he ever made. He was entering the final year of his contract, right after tying a career high 15.5 sacks. The Chiefs offered him an extension for $27 million a year, making him the 2nd highest paid DT right under Donald. Now he's only making slightly more money THIS year, and will be out a ton of money if he doesn't repeat what he did last season. He's only ever had double digit sacks twice in his career, so if he has just an OK season, forget any team offering him more money than Donald (like he wants), he'll be lucky to get that $27 million the Chiefs were offering him! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetermansRedemption Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 46 minutes ago, BigDingus said: This is going to be the worst decision he ever made. He was entering the final year of his contract, right after tying a career high 15.5 sacks. The Chiefs offered him an extension for $27 million a year, making him the 2nd highest paid DT right under Donald. Now he's only making slightly more money THIS year, and will be out a ton of money if he doesn't repeat what he did last season. He's only ever had double digit sacks twice in his career, so if he has just an OK season, forget any team offering him more money than Donald (like he wants), he'll be lucky to get that $27 million the Chiefs were offering him! Never understood the hold out and then accept a deal barely better than what they were holding out for. Jones, Sauqon, Jacobs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.