Jump to content

Colin Cowherd at it again


I'm Spartacus

Recommended Posts

On 6/12/2023 at 2:26 PM, CSBill said:

 

Because the Jets have an offensive-minded HC, right?

 

lol, good point.

 

these guys spin a narrative, but are too lazy to spend 10 minutes covering the loose ends.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2023 at 7:05 AM, SirAndrew said:

Yeah, and a lot of people confuse being a good talker with knowledge and intelligence. That’s how the show has been so successful, but you can actually hear the same stuff on any sports talk show. 

 

One reason I watch him some is….at least they are not all SCREAMING at each other like most ESPN shows. That’s a pretty low bar, and I’m listening to more music lately.   🤷‍♂️

 

Funny little side note regarding Cowher side kick JMac the Jets fan: In light of the Diggs Drama yesterday he said it’s about time the Bills have to face some adversity after 3 years of ascending reputation with no obstacles. WAIT! WHAT? We didn’t face any adversity last year? I won’t bother listing the adversities we faced last year, but it’s hard to think of a team that faced more adversity in a single season. 

 

These guys talk all day and are bound to say something stupid at some point, but that was just showing bias and ignorance wrapped in one statement. It’s why I can’t take them too serious. Like the games themselves, I have to remind myself it’s just a form of entertainment. 

 

.

Edited by Augie
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gary Marangi said:

He is doing his early division picks today said there is one early surprise. Wanna bet it's Buffalo not winning division and predicts us to finish 3rd in AFC East

 

He had Miami winning the AFCE with the Bills still making the playoffs as a wild card. 

 

That’s fine, it could happen and what do I care what he says at this point. Win a few in a row and look good doing the bandwagon will come back around. Whatever. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2023 at 12:41 PM, The Wiz said:

I think it would be interested to know what everyone's opinion of McDermott would be if he was an offensive minded coach or if you just pretended he was.

 

Would people still be happy with the results that he's had or would they expect more?

My opinion of his past results would be the exact same, but I might be more hopeful than I am about future results.

I'm pretty well resigned that he's peaked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen owned fangio’s defense in Denver. He made that game his personal highlight reel.

 

plus he gets to embarrass Ramsay.

 

JA17 he already owns Miami, so im not worried about the fish. Especially with mr concussion waiting to happen at any moment. 
 

Miami is a paper tiger

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said:

My opinion of his past results would be the exact same, but I might be more hopeful than I am about future results.

I'm pretty well resigned that he's peaked.

This is kind of my point though.  A defensive minded coach was able to perform as well as and offensive minded head coach (in theory) but because he's not an offensive minded head coach he has no room to improve offensively?

 

If anything you would think it would be the opposite since he's not familiar with the offensive workings like an offensive head coach would be.

 

With that's being said, I still don't know how much, if at all, McD is involved regarding the offense and just gives that to his OC like he apparently did with daboll.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

This is kind of my point though.  A defensive minded coach was able to perform as well as and offensive minded head coach (in theory) but because he's not an offensive minded head coach he has no room to improve offensively?

 

If anything you would think it would be the opposite since he's not familiar with the offensive workings like an offensive head coach would be.

 

With that's being said, I still don't know how much, if at all, McD is involved regarding the offense and just gives that to his OC like he apparently did with daboll.

 

I loved English and hated math. I got the same score on the SAT. Sister Jeanne made sure of that. You can’t have weak spots, like a lousy second serve in tennis. It will kill you. 

 

You can be a “defensive coach”, and still have a good offense. See the Buffalo Bills rankings the last several years in nearly every offensive category. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, The Wiz said:

This is kind of my point though.  A defensive minded coach was able to perform as well as and offensive minded head coach (in theory) but because he's not an offensive minded head coach he has no room to improve offensively?

That's a very bizarre set of logic. I'm extremely unsatisfied with McDermott and the results he's brought. To invent a scenario where an offensive coach had the same results, and say, "just as good" doesn't make any sense. I'd want that offensive guy gone too. The plan isn't to hire an underachieving offensive mind - it's to hire a great one.

I was against the McDermott hire from the beginning because of his defensive leanings, outdated scheme, and a lack of being an elite coordinator. Now, maybe he turned out to be a great hire for what we needed at the time, but I've seen enough of him on Sundays to know that he isn't at the level of Championship-tier coaches. He doesn't resemble Belichick, Reid, Pederson, McVay or guys on the cusp like Siriani and Shananhan.

Never, NEVER, have I gone into a game and thought, McDermott is going to out maneuver the other team today - the Coach is going to win this one.

If you want to win it all, I think you need a coach that can do that, even if he doesn't have to. That, or you need a lot of luck to swing your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

That's a very bizarre set of logic. I'm extremely unsatisfied with McDermott and the results he's brought. To invent a scenario where an offensive coach had the same results, and say, "just as good" doesn't make any sense. I'd want that offensive guy gone too. The plan isn't to hire an underachieving offensive mind - it's to hire a great one.

I was against the McDermott hire from the beginning because of his defensive leanings, outdated scheme, and a lack of being an elite coordinator. Now, maybe he turned out to be a great hire for what we needed at the time, but I've seen enough of him on Sundays to know that he isn't at the level of Championship-tier coaches. He doesn't resemble Belichick, Reid, Pederson, McVay or guys on the cusp like Siriani and Shananhan.

Never, NEVER, have I gone into a game and thought, McDermott is going to out maneuver the other team today - the Coach is going to win this one.

If you want to win it all, I think you need a coach that can do that, even if he doesn't have to. That, or you need a lot of luck to swing your way.

Based on your standards it sounds like you need a perfect season and championship every year if you are extremely unsatisfied.

 

As far as his defensive leaning, outdated scheme and lack of being an elite coordinator, maybe we will see something different from the defense this year now that Frasier isn't calling the defense.  I'm sure this is where you will say that it's still McD's defense that Frasier was running but that's not the same thing as who is making the play calls.

 

The offense, as far as I remember from Allen's statements in the past, are in the OC's hands on game day so other than their game plan meetings, I don't think he's really doing much in challenging/changing anything that is being called by Dorsey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

Based on your standards it sounds like you need a perfect season and championship every year if you are extremely unsatisfied.

 

As far as his defensive leaning, outdated scheme and lack of being an elite coordinator, maybe we will see something different from the defense this year now that Frasier isn't calling the defense.  I'm sure this is where you will say that it's still McD's defense that Frasier was running but that's not the same thing as who is making the play calls.

 

The offense, as far as I remember from Allen's statements in the past, are in the OC's hands on game day so other than their game plan meetings, I don't think he's really doing much in challenging/changing anything that is being called by Dorsey.


And that's part of the problem. The rest of the coaches I mentioned are chess grandmasters of the NFL. Other coaches put pressure on our team, and we settle for the scraps instead of outsmarting them. The Cincinnati game was a prime example of us having absolutely no answer to gameplan adversity. We defer to dictate the pace of play far too often in big games. The heatstroke game in Miami is another example.

I don't need a perfect season by any means. What i need is situational awareness and execution that shows a coach knows exactly what he's doing. Coincidentally, if we had that, I believe we'd already have a championship or two. McD's teams run the most vanilla "beat the man across from you" systems I've seen in years. He's a coach born 40 years too late.

having an offense/defense that's top 5 is meaningless when the goal is to win a championship. Those ranking are determined in aggregate. Championships are determined based on situational football. When your team has to make 1 play, can they do it? What will the coach dial up?

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:


And that's part of the problem. The rest of the coaches I mentioned are chess grandmasters of the NFL. Other coaches put pressure on our team, and we settle for the scraps instead of outsmarting them. The Cincinnati game was a prime example of us having absolutely no answer to gameplan adversity.

I don't need a perfect season by any means. What i need is situational awareness and execution that shows a coach knows exactly what he's doing. Coincidentally, if we had that, I believe we'd already have a championship or two. McD's teams run the most vanilla "beat the man across from you" systems I've seen in years. He's a coach born 40 years too late.

having an offense/defense that's top 5 is meaningless when the goal is to win a championship. Those ranking are determined in aggregate. Championships are determined based on situational football. When your team has to make 1 play, can they do it? What will the coach dial up?

I'll agree with you about the Cincy game.  Both the offense and defense had no answer for what they should do.

 

I do believe that Mcdermott has the situational awareness like the other coaches but like you said in your previous post, I really do think it does sometimes come down to just plan dumb luck.  A good example of that was against the titans when Allen slipped on 4th down.  I'd want them to go for that every time and I think he would instead of kicking for the tie and OT.

 

The thing that I will say that McD doesn't have that many of these other coaches have is a killer instinct.  He doesn't have that Belichick "if they can't stop it, we're just gonna keep running it" mentality.  He takes the foot off the gas when they get a 2 score lead and goes to a basic game plan.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

I'll agree with you about the Cincy game.  Both the offense and defense had no answer for what they should do.

 

I do believe that Mcdermott has the situational awareness like the other coaches but like you said in your previous post, I really do think it does sometimes come down to just plan dumb luck.  A good example of that was against the titans when Allen slipped on 4th down.  I'd want them to go for that every time and I think he would instead of kicking for the tie and OT.

 

The thing that I will say that McD doesn't have that many of these other coaches have is a killer instinct.  He doesn't have that Belichick "if they can't stop it, we're just gonna keep running it" mentality.  He takes the foot off the gas when they get a 2 score lead and goes to a basic game plan.

The bolded is such a killer. I don't remember exactly which game it was, but it was a good way through the season and we we clamoring for the bills to run the ball and they finally started to. Going into halftime we were just wrecking them on the ground picking up 5-6 yards a clip. Then the bills come out int he 2nd half with a lead and just start throwing hail mary's again and we let the opponent back in the game.

We played multiple teams with battered offensive lines, including the Bengals who were down 3 starting linemen in our playoff game. Instead of changing up our looks and bringing pressure that backup olinemen cant deal with, they ran the same vanilla soft zone, rush 4 coverage they schemed in august.

And that type of stuff - taking advantage of glaring personnel weakness or broad scheme is the 101 stuff. That's the bare minimum and we don't do it. Guys like Reid and Belichick do things like, "I know they've seen us do a thing on tape, so we're going to set it up like we're doing that and then do a totally different thing to move the better player out of position to take advantage of the weaker player". Without being int he room, I'm fairly convinced that's how Travis Kelce is routinely open with no one 10 yards around him despite being the primary threat in nearly every game he's in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2023 at 1:23 PM, benderbender said:

I really hate that he knows the formula and we’re too naïve to keep his mentions low. 

Yup. It’s wild to me that there are people who actually listen to him and Cowherd (Stephen A used to be in the same boat but he is entertaining to me). They know nothing about sports and say the dumbest things, why would anyone take them serious? But people listen, get mad, and they are doing their job. 
 

this extends into politics (that dork Clay Travis has admitted to creating the conservative sports outlet since he wasn’t good enough at his first effort) as well. Nothing like finding red meat to feed to people, get them all riled up, and then walk away smiling to the bank. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...