Jump to content

Bills hosted RB Latavious Murray


NewEra

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, purple haze said:

They bring 90 to camp.   Signing him would be signing a productive, physical, veteran player.   They could still draft a guy in the mid-later rounds.   Beane and McDermott are all about competition.

 

That's true. And Murray could always fill that Duke Johnson Practice Squad vet RB role and I think he'd be a good fit there.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

You shop at the flea market when you have a flea market budget

You draft poorly you have to find roll players in the bargain basement because of the tight budget. That’s what this team is all about. 

Edited by BananaB
  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I mean if they sign him, that’s probably what they are agreeing too. Murray doesn’t really make sense on this team besides as an insurance policy.

 

exactly, which is why I asked why they would ever agree to this.  Makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Allen2Diggs said:

I feel like this is just part of some Beane smokescreen to make it seem like we're still interested in adding a rb and might draft Bijan Robinson.

 

He keeps saying that Edmunds' replacement is on the roster and we haven't signed anyone new at LB, so that screams that we'll take a linebacker in the 1st or 2nd.

Please share a link confirming Beane actually said " Edmunds replacement is on the roster ". I DID read that Dodson,Bernard and Spector, maybe even Matakevich,  would COMPETE for the job. But that doesnt mean Beane won't sign or draft a LB. Ridiculous to think he would limit his draft options by believing that. Perhaps a smoke screen to fool the gullible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Herb Nightly said:

Please share a link confirming Beane actually said " Edmunds replacement is on the roster ". I DID read that Dodson,Bernard and Spector, maybe even Matakevich,  would COMPETE for the job. But that doesnt mean Beane won't sign or draft a LB. Ridiculous to think he would limit his draft options by believing that. Perhaps a smoke screen to fool the gullible?


On replacing Tremaine Edmunds: "Sometimes your answer is on your roster."

 

https://buffalonews.com/sports/bills/bills-gm-brandon-beane-on-free-agency-replacing-edmunds-obj-and-more/article_d9be1eac-c43e-11ed-906a-f74f0e2c9955.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

And this ain't one of them? 🤔

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Hopefully he means on our roster after the addition we make on April 27th or 28th because there's not a name on our roster that inspires confidence at MLB right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Fan in Chicago said:

What is it with this new RB obsession?

Why can't McBeane get so unhealthilly interested in OLinemen?

 

Perhaps so they don't need to waste a draft pick on one?  Vet minimum contract for him would likely qualify at a lower cap hit under the NFL's salary cap agreement as a vested vet. 

 

Didn't Beane sign like 5 or 6 OL UFA's last year? Did you simply forget about that or were you missing last offseason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize how well he played last year, as a 32 year old running back--in 12 games rushing for 703 yards!, with 6 touchdowns, 4.4 yards per carry, and 26 receptions too.  Those are very good stats for any back, let alone one in his early 30s.

 

And throw in the fact that he was behind center with one of the worst starting quarterbacks in the NFL, Russel Wilson, and it is more impressive.

 

This is the kind of inexpensive veteran I want on this team.

 

 

Edited by Mister Defense
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

Is his wife? Asking for a friend.

 

Bev_Bighead.gif

I cannot speak for Mrs. Draconator's appearance.  Draconator's look, however, has been plastered on these hallowed pages many times.  Guitar twanging and swimming with the dolphins, for two such examples.

😁

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

I cannot speak for Mrs. Draconator's appearance.  Draconator's look, however, has been plastered on these hallowed pages many times.  Guitar twanging and swimming with the dolphins, for two such examples.

😁

Ah but you see I posted a picture of Mrs Bighead, hence my question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine 4 NFL quality rb's on this team, only to not run the ball this year. Sign me up!

If Murray wants to come here for veteran minimum than come join the party i guess. But he's not going to give us much of anything we dont already have. For a team that doesnt even run much, getting Murray wont move that needle at all. Would it hurt? No not really. Could it help? Sure. Remains to be seen if we can run the ball at all... or if we'll even try.

PS: i dont mean this to sound negative, just one of those days lol

Edited by brianthomas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, brianthomas said:

Imagine 4 NFL quality rb's on this team, only to not run the ball this year. Sign me up!

If Murray wants to come here for veteran minimum than come join the party i guess. But he's not going to give us much of anything we dont already have. For a team that doesnt even run much, getting Murray wont move that needle at all. Would it hurt? No not really. Could it help? Sure. Remains to be seen if we can run the ball at all... or if we'll even try.

PS: i dont mean this to sound negative, just one of those days lol


If Dorsey can actually be creative:

2 Back Sets:   Cook & Hines -  Speed. Screens. Motion. Slot. 
                        Harris & Murray - Power. Short Yardage. Pass Block. Goal line. 


Then mix & match so the defense is kept off balance 
 

Edited by Warriorspikes51
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...