Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Maybe I missed this discussed via McD post game, or the discussion on here…

 

The Bills leave themselves short handed on the outside with just Diggs, Davis, Kumerow when Shakir is inactive. 
 

An injury to our #1 or #2 would have us forced to use certain personnel, with Knox as the split end, or possibly force Kumerow into action. 
 

I think TD Jesus is a capable WR, but I’d rather have the rook be available to step in, instead of have all three RBs (Single, Moss, Cook) active each week. It is not necessary. 
 

Thoughts?

Edited by EmotionallyUnstable
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 10
  • Disagree 4
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 9:58 PM, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Maybe I missed this discussed via McD post game, or the discussion on here…

 

The Bills leave themselves short handed on the outside with just Diggs, Davis, Kumerow when Shakir is inactive. 
 

An injury to our #1 or #2 would have us forced to use certain personnel, with Knox as the split end, or possibly force Kumerow into action. 
 

I think TD Jesus is a capable WR, but I’d rather have the rook be available to step in, instead of have all three RBs (Single, Moss, Cook) active each week. It is not necessary. 
 

Thoughts?

Expand  

I missed the inactives last night.  Who was on the list? 

Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 9:58 PM, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Maybe I missed this discussed via McD post game, or the discussion on here…

 

The Bills leave themselves short handed on the outside with just Diggs, Davis, Kumerow when Shakir is inactive. 
 

An injury to our #1 or #2 would have us forced to use certain personnel, with Knox as the split end, or possibly force Kumerow into action. 
 

I think TD Jesus is a capable WR, but I’d rather have the rook be available to step in, instead of have all three RBs (Single, Moss, Cook) active each week. It is not necessary. 
 

Thoughts?

Expand  


I think they would have slid Crowder to the outside. I actually don’t see Shakir being active ever if they activate both crowder and McKenzie. 
 

Especially after that fumble last night, they aren’t going to be activating only Cook as the second RB. 

Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:10 PM, EmotionallyUnstable said:


Those players are almost solely slot guys 

Expand  

 

They can play all over in a pinch.  If an injury occurs then the Bills will adjust to it in game then after that they can make Shakir active if they wish.  Shakir is also mostly a slot guy but can also play all over.  Just because he was inactive week 1 doesnt mean he will stay inactive either.  Shakir will get a chance.

Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:05 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He’ll get an opportunity soon enough.

Expand  

 

  On 9/9/2022 at 10:12 PM, 3rdand12 said:

yep  his time will come !

Expand  

They are letting him earn his stripes.  The rookies at CB was because we had no one else.  

 

McD is big on this, letting rookies watch now and then play, unless they are truly someone you shouldn't keep off the field.  Shakir is good for sure, but the vets are the better players to play on opening night.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:17 PM, The Wiz said:

 

They are letting him earn his stripes.  The rookies at CB was because we had no one else.  

 

McD is big on this, letting rookies watch now and then play, unless they are truly someone you shouldn't keep off the field.  Shakir is good for sure, but the vets are the better players to play on opening night.

Expand  

 

This 100%. McD is smart to go with Crowder on PR and Slot in such a game over a rookie. Shakir will get his opportunities this season, but last night it wasnt in the cards. I think we kept all 3 RBs active because they didnt fully trust Cook yet either and he proved that right. Hence the healthy dose of Moss. Agreed the DBs are playing because they have no other choice, and our Safeties can help them out.

Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:17 PM, The Wiz said:

 

They are letting him earn his stripes.  The rookies at CB was because we had no one else.  

 

McD is big on this, letting rookies watch now and then play, unless they are truly someone you shouldn't keep off the field.  Shakir is good for sure, but the vets are the better players to play on opening night.

Expand  


They traditionally don’t activate 3 RBs on game day so he must think that of Cook. 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

He wasn't needed. McD and co. spent a lot of time researching this game and I'm not going to second guess them one bit.

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 9:58 PM, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Maybe I missed this discussed via McD post game, or the discussion on here…

 

The Bills leave themselves short handed on the outside with just Diggs, Davis, Kumerow when Shakir is inactive. 
 

An injury to our #1 or #2 would have us forced to use certain personnel, with Knox as the split end, or possibly force Kumerow into action. 
 

I think TD Jesus is a capable WR, but I’d rather have the rook be available to step in, instead of have all three RBs (Single, Moss, Cook) active each week. It is not necessary. 
 

Thoughts?

Expand  


clearly they should Sam Martin should be inactive to make room for Shakir to be activated. That’s assuming Shakir can hold. It’s not rocket science.

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:26 PM, EmotionallyUnstable said:


They traditionally don’t activate 3 RBs on game day so he must think that of Cook. 

 

Expand  

He had 140 carries at Georgia and didn't fumble once.  

 

They activated Cook because I'm guessing they wanted him in the passing game and not the running game.  After the fumble on his first touch, I'm sure they put him on the bench because he was probably gonna be in his own head.

I would guess that a lot of those swing passes to Moss were really suppose to be to see what Cook could do.

Posted
  On 9/9/2022 at 10:30 PM, Shaw66 said:

And Diggs is a wideout, right?   He's in the slot a lot. 

 

McDermott is big on position flexibility.  All the wideouts can play all three positions.  

Expand  


Sure, and yet it still limits their versatility to have one fewer guy in the mix. A team that has a base 11 personnel with 3 WRs more than any other team in football only has 5 active WRs on game day? It’s like they’re short changing themselves for the handful of snaps the 3rd RB will get. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...