JoPoy88 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 4 minutes ago, BigDingus said: How did these 10 year old emails come to light again? Did somebody just hang onto them for a decade until Gruden stopped paying their ransom demands or something? It's all so weird to me. The emails involving Gruden are not all 10 years old. Reports say the emails sent to the Raiders and subsequently leaked spanned 7 years. There may be emails even more current than that. If you check earlier in the thread, you’ll see how they came to the league’s attention. (They were discovered because the emails were between Gruden and his good buddy Bruce Allen, former GM of the WFT.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 3 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: No I think we need to continue to educate to eliminate behaviors going forward and not weaponize groups to attack those they don't like. There is a much bigger issue at play than Jon Gruden. I mean are we really going to go back in time and check out what everyone has ever said and done. Are the writers doing these stories all clean- no way. I know alot of people who have been educated and improved in recent years and that should be the goal. Sure. But that doesn’t mean every business partner should have to stand tall by you before you even start down that road. I suspect he would’ve stood a better chance if he came out and said “you know what I messed up and there’s a good chance there’s more out there because a long time ago I was an idiot but this is who I am today and how I’ve changed” —- but instead the latest batch include some pretty recent dumbassery. At what crossroads do you believe he started his reformation into a better man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, JoPoy88 said: The emails involving Gruden are not all 10 years old. Reports say the emails sent to the Raiders and subsequently leaked spanned 7 years. There may be emails even more current than that. If you check earlier in the thread, you’ll see how they came to the league’s attention. (They were discovered because the emails were between Gruden and his good buddy Bruce Allen, former GM of the WFT.) Even without any emails, if you are friends with Bruce Allen, you are probably a shady jerk at best. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoPoy88 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, Bruffalo said: You know what's a good way to "eliminate behaviors"? Punitive consequences based on your actions. Nobody is weaponizing anything, cut the victim angle. He said horrible, indefensible things about large swaths of people. On top of that he directed that hatred towards the commissioner of the organization he works for, and he spread/shared nude images of women without their consent. It's crazy to me that you would even try to say that he should be educated instead of being held responsible because he might have changed his views nebulously at some point. 💯 and on top of that - Gruden was a leader. A head coach 3 times over. Leadership gets held to a higher standard. Not a hard concept to grasp. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 Where is C Biscuit to defend Gruden because Tyreek Hill beat a woman and is still in the League? Feel like this topic is his bat signal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharky7337 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 Wait till the final part comes out when he tried to show the cheer leaders his spider 2 y banana! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 2 minutes ago, Bruffalo said: You know what's a good way to "eliminate behaviors"? Punitive consequences based on your actions. Nobody is weaponizing anything, cut the victim angle. He said horrible, indefensible things about large swaths of people. On top of that he directed that hatred towards the commissioner of the organization he works for, and he spread/shared nude images of women without their consent. It's crazy to me that you would even try to say that he should be educated instead of being held responsible because he might have changed his views nebulously at some point. With no evidence that his views ever changed on top of all that. I was all in that a random comment 10 years ago would leave him uncomfortable but otherwise unaffected as long as he wasn’t an idiot responding. Those comments continuing down the timeline 7 more years, with no known end other than the scope of the investigation and change in his own employment… big difference 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: With no evidence that his views ever changed on top of all that. I was all in that a random comment 10 years ago would leave him uncomfortable but otherwise unaffected as long as he wasn’t an idiot responding. Those comments continuing down the timeline 7 more years, with no known end other than the scope of the investigation and change in his own employment… big difference "I'm not racist, I just hate f@#$" -Jon Gruden, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Williams Available Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 hour ago, VaMilBill said: The thing I hate about this is it seems like people just want to tear someone down for the sake of tearing someone down. Big tree fall hard. Gruden has never had anything said about his views on race or sexual orientation affecting his professionalism. Look at someone’s actions on how you judge someone, not on their words. I am not a Gruden fan but this just seemed like a career assassination. Career suicide you mean. If you’re ever in a position of responsibility, especially around easily influenced young people where you are charged as their leader, you cannot act like this in any capacity, ever. At ESPN sure, be an A**Hole, but the second you’re head coach of a football team again your credibility is sh*t and you deserve to lose that career over this. It’s self-inflicted. To think a dummy who says/thinks such things in private can somehow separate himself from these biases in public is laughable, and the reason you can’t have him leading other people. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 13 minutes ago, NoSaint said: Sure. But that doesn’t mean every business partner should have to stand tall by you before you even start down that road. I suspect he would’ve stood a better chance if he came out and said “you know what I messed up and there’s a good chance there’s more out there because a long time ago I was an idiot but this is who I am today and how I’ve changed” —- but instead the latest batch include some pretty recent dumbassery. At what crossroads do you believe he started his reformation into a better man? At 58 years old, I’m not sure you do believe he’s reformed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDingus Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 19 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said: Read the post above yours. "Investigation into the Washington Football Team's Workplace Culture" Most businesses of any size archive emails, including received sent and deleted emails, for a loooooong time. Yeah, that was posted at the same time I was posting mine. Only thing I knew about this story was when it first broke that he made comments about someone's lips. That was the last time I checked back on this until I saw he resigned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 1 minute ago, BigDingus said: Yeah, that was posted at the same time I was posting mine. Only thing I knew about this story was when it first broke that he made comments about someone's lips. That was the last time I checked back on this until I saw he resigned. Maybe take some time to read up before defending these guys next time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 It's amazing how many times my opinion slowly shifted to being against Gruden as the 2nd set of emails came to light. Sending Emails to a friend of Topless cheerleaders -- tasteless but not exactly evil. Potentially sending them from a company email -- completely idiotic but still not doomsday level Complaining about the protest -- unless there was overly racist phrases used then it would not be wrong to voice a disagreement (If Goodell actually pressured a team to take Michael Sam, then that's worthy of complaint) That being said using slurs is unacceptable. Being against women refs in itself isn't evil; but based on the information we have it certainly seems as if more derogatory language was used thus not good Calling the league's commissioner slurs while working in a career that revolves around said league is both wrong but worse, it's idiotic At the end of the day he screwed himself and I have little sympathy for him 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablitzkrieg Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 58 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: Doubt it lol. No top tier HC is going to touch the raiders with a ten foot poll. That combo i strongly see going to Miami. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 14 minutes ago, NoSaint said: With no evidence that his views ever changed on top of all that. I was all in that a random comment 10 years ago would leave him uncomfortable but otherwise unaffected as long as he wasn’t an idiot responding. Those comments continuing down the timeline 7 more years, with no known end other than the scope of the investigation and change in his own employment… big difference I mean, so we know that Goodell isn’t just a bundle of sticks? Have you ever seen Goodell and a bundle of sticks in the same place? Gruden doesn’t want a happy practice environment. He wasn’t a place where people come to work, where they are locked in. Don’t you show up all gay and merry to his facility. We know the above is true, because Gruden does not have rubbery lips. Jon “Not rubber lipped” Gruden. That’s what they called him growing up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 How long before organizations, prior to entering into these types of multimillion dollar contracts with individuals, demand access to their private email and social media history? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoPoy88 Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 (edited) 13 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: It's amazing how many times my opinion slowly shifted to being against Gruden as the 2nd set of emails came to light. Sending Emails to a friend of Topless cheerleaders -- tasteless but not exactly evil. Potentially sending them from a company email -- completely idiotic but still not doomsday level Complaining about the protest -- unless there was overly racist phrases used then it would not be wrong to voice a disagreement (If Goodell actually pressured a team to take Michael Sam, then that's worthy of complaint) That being said using slurs is unacceptable. Being against women refs in itself isn't evil; but based on the information we have it certainly seems as if more derogatory language was used thus not good Calling the league's commissioner slurs while working in a career that revolves around said league is both wrong but worse, it's idiotic At the end of the day he screwed himself and I have little sympathy for him bud those cheerleaders were WFT cheerleaders. Not just random porn images. Big difference. being against female officials isn’t “evil?” You seem very fond of that characterization. Eeeeevill. No, Gruden’s comments are not evil in the biblical sense. Crass, idiotic, distasteful, and, most of all, grounds for termination? Most definitely. (Also, why wouldn’t we want to give females a shot to referee? Not like the men are doing any kind of adequate job. We witnessed that yet again just last night.) 6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: How long before organizations, prior to entering into these types of multimillion dollar contracts with individuals, demand access to their private email and social media history? Uh, employers routinely look into prospective employees’ social media history. Been doing it for years. Edited October 12, 2021 by JoPoy88 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 Having read the last few pages, I have a sampling of my favorite talking points. "Gruden was wrong but he said it in the ancient calendar year of 2014. He probably became a better person after Obama's 2nd term ended." "Who cares, everyone has said awful hateful things. Especially me. I've said so many awful hateful things. It just rolls off my tongue like nothing." "The direct boss of several black and gay people should be treated the same way as a rapper from the 90s." 1 4 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Williams Available Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 59 minutes ago, Sharky7337 said: Society and people will never be perfect. I don't condone insulting people based on any discriminatory factor. Or that any race religion or creed is better then any other. Whether I agree with them or not people should be entitled to have their own opinions and beliefs without the fear of losing their jobs or lives over it. I hope one day we can come to accept and forgive and learn from these sorts of mistakes without trying to "make an example" or "cancel" people. This dude is in an extreme leadership role where he is the role model for 50 or so young men and a staff of men and women. His “opinions” and “beliefs” suggest he thinks he’s superior and/or it’s ok to discriminate against some of the people he leads. This disqualifies him from leading these or any people. I used to roof houses with guys that had a greater sense of responsibility than Gruden. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted October 12, 2021 Share Posted October 12, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: How long before organizations, prior to entering into these types of multimillion dollar contracts with individuals, demand access to their private email and social media history? Fun fact, most good HR dept’s already scope out your social media without you knowing. Add on: If you use your personal phone for your employer be careful what you send and do on it. Once you set up the exchange server your phone is basically your companies, and you have basically agreed to give them access to it. Also, if you think your work phone is private, it might be. But it might not be. I’ve worked with people who have had their texts read by senior leadership. Edited October 12, 2021 by Mango 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.