Jump to content

The Democrat cartel


Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Did you have a problem with Trump hiring Mitch McConnell's wife as transportation secretary and did you vocalize it?

 

Asking for a friend...

 

Anything Trump did is OK for Biden to do. Is that the new standard?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Anything Trump did is OK for Biden to do. Is that the new standard?

 

Not saying that.

 

What I am asking is if he was as critical of that appointment and as vocal about it as he is of this one...?

 

And I suppose now I will throw the same question to you...

 

So...?

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Not saying that.

 

What I am asking is if he was as critical of that appointment and as vocal about it as he is of this one...?

 

And I suppose now I will throw the same question to you...

 

So...?

 

I did not criticize President Biden hiring her. However it does seem like some political inside baseball, but it is politics after all.

 

I thought the level of nepotism and cronyism in President Trump's term was appalling.

 

To think we have nepotism laws put in place after JFK that did not apply is ludicrous.

 

Perhaps drafting a new nepotism law to prevent future cases like this would be a good thing for Congress to work on.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Not saying that.

 

What I am asking is if he was as critical of that appointment and as vocal about it as he is of this one...?

 

And I suppose now I will throw the same question to you...

 

So...?

A lot of what Trump did was gross, he is a shady person who has done some shady $#it. This ALSO sucks because of what it represents. Do you agree?

Edited by Tenhigh
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

A lot of what Trump did was gross, he is a shady person who has done some shady $#it. This ALSO sucks because of what it represents. Do you agree?

 

I don't think this is even in the same ballpark as Trump putting family and personal friends with ZERO experience as public servants into important cabinet and government positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I don't think this is even in the same ballpark as Trump putting family and personal friends with ZERO experience as public servants into important cabinet and government positions.

Public servants my arse. 😂😂😂

You crack me up. Yes, it’s far better to have the same public sector swamp creatures draining the American people of jobs and taxes while they run up a deficit larger than the planet. We need to leave that important work to the real ‘professionals’. Hilarious! 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I don't think this is even in the same ballpark as Trump putting family and personal friends with ZERO experience as public servants into important cabinet and government positions.

Is cronyism worse than buying off Manchin? Come on man, they are BOTH scumbag moves bro.  It's ok to admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2021 at 3:54 AM, reddogblitz said:

 

I did not criticize President Biden hiring her. However it does seem like some political inside baseball, but it is politics after all.

 

that’s exactly what it is.  Manchin is a very moderate Democrat, so anything Joe can do to tio the scales a little...

Edited by RiotAct
tip, not tio 😵
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Joe Biden’s really working overtime to sell America on his massive “infrastructure” plan:

 

 

For what it’s worth, Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand seems to think that Biden’s onto something, because she’s really running with this “infrastructure” business:

 

 

 

 

 

You know, we never thought of it that way.

 

Maybe because it’s so mind-numbingly stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

cb040721dAPR20210407034507.jpg

 

 

 

Deja-*****-vu

 

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/

 

What happened???  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

Joe Biden’s really working overtime to sell America on his massive “infrastructure” plan:

 

 

For what it’s worth, Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand seems to think that Biden’s onto something, because she’s really running with this “infrastructure” business:

 

 

 

 

 

You know, we never thought of it that way.

 

Maybe because it’s so mind-numbingly stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

cb040721dAPR20210407034507.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Ted expands on the democrat idea of what infra structure is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

9 Crazy Examples of Unrelated Waste and Partisan Spending in Biden’s $2 Trillion ‘Infrastructure’ Proposal.

 

 

https://fee.org/articles/9-crazy-examples-of-unrelated-waste-and-partisan-spending-in-biden-s-2t-infrastructure-proposal/

 

 

 

 

Ok Chef Jim's cynicism rears it's ugly head again. 

 

Obama signed the last big infrastructure Bill in 2015.  It authorized $306b from fiscal 2016-2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs (taken from the "official" FAST site).  Well is it me or does this reek of those that got paid out of this are now coming back with their hands out seeing the FAST Act gravy train is ending?  What didn't get fixed from FAST that needs more $$ to fix now and why?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Eff it.  Pretty soon I’m going to stop going to work. The handouts are getting super lucrative and why have a job and earn money only for them to steal it and give it to someone else.
 

 

 

Universal Basic Income.  Coming to a recliner and beer cooler near you! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter's laptop is a pandora's box of shocking revelations, explicit photos and intimate http://communications. In the following days, http://DailyMail.com will publish more shocking stories from Hunter's laptop, including:

 

How Hunter blew hundreds of thousands on prostitutes, drugs and luxury cars, leaving him scrambling to avoid jail for $320k in unpaid taxes

 

How five members of the Biden family have been to rehab for drug or alcohol abuse – and a stunning admission by Joe to his son

 

The OTHER Biden family member planning to buy and cook crack, after falling into the disastrous addiction with Hunter

 

Hunter's unconventional and unlikely relationship with his well-known psychiatrist

 

The whispered bedroom conversation with a prostitute caught on Hunter's webcam, in which he confesses he had a previous laptop stolen – by Russians for blackmail

 

The president's son left his 2017 MacBook Pro laptop at a Wilmington, Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019 and never returned for it.

 

Emails leaked from the computer sparked a scandal before the 2020 presidential election in October, but were dismissed as Russian disinformation by the Bidens and other senior Democrats, social media giants Twitter and Facebook, and several major media organizations.

 

After obtaining a copy of the hard drive, http://DailyMail.com commissioned top cyber forensics experts Maryman & Associates to analyze its data and determine whether the laptop's contents were real.

 

The firm's founder, Brad Maryman, is a 29-year FBI veteran Supervisory Special Agent who served as an Information Security Officer and founded its first computer forensics lab.

 

Maryman and his business partner Dr. Joseph Greenfield used the same forensic tools to pick apart the drive as federal and state law enforcement use in criminal investigations, and prepared a report for DailyMail.com.

 

The report said the data on the drive 'appear to be authentic', and that after an extensive search of its contents for any tell-tale signs of tampering, Maryman and Greenfield found 'no evidence' of fabrication – by Russians or anyone else.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9445105/amp/What-Hunter-Biden-left-tell-memoir-revealed.html

 

 

5f510c4e63ac5b12e361a6a2f41b7e4c4195dbe5

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

By the way, don't forget what Joe said back in October when asked about court packing.

 

Biden says voters ‘don’t deserve’ his stance on packing Supreme Court

joe-biden-7.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=6

 

Voters don’t “deserve” to know Joe Biden’s stance on packing the Supreme Court, the Democratic nominee said this week.

 

In a prickly interview with a Las Vegas news station Friday, the Biden doubled down on his refusal to say whether he supports  expanding the highest court in the land to more than nine justices.

 

“This is the number one thing that I’ve been asked about from viewers in the last couple of days,” began KTNV’s Ross DiMattei.

 

“Well, you’ve been asked by the viewers who are probably Republicans,” Biden sarcastically responded.

 

“Don’t the voters deserve to know where you stand on …” DiMattei continued.

 

“No, they don’t deserve,” Biden snapped. “I’m not going to play his game.”

 

https://nypost.com/2020/10/10/voters-dont-deserve-stance-on-packing-supreme-court-biden/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

By the way, don't forget what Joe said back in October when asked about court packing.

 

Biden says voters ‘don’t deserve’ his stance on packing Supreme Court

joe-biden-7.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=6

 

Voters don’t “deserve” to know Joe Biden’s stance on packing the Supreme Court, the Democratic nominee said this week.

 

In a prickly interview with a Las Vegas news station Friday, the Biden doubled down on his refusal to say whether he supports  expanding the highest court in the land to more than nine justices.

 

“This is the number one thing that I’ve been asked about from viewers in the last couple of days,” began KTNV’s Ross DiMattei.

 

“Well, you’ve been asked by the viewers who are probably Republicans,” Biden sarcastically responded.

 

“Don’t the voters deserve to know where you stand on …” DiMattei continued.

 

“No, they don’t deserve,” Biden snapped. “I’m not going to play his game.”

 

https://nypost.com/2020/10/10/voters-dont-deserve-stance-on-packing-supreme-court-biden/


Oh I can’t wait until we pack the court and take away your guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Liberal fear is palpable.

 

 

 

 

 

Giving somebody a job based on their RACE and GENDER? I'm appalled... Isnt that what progressives and liberals have been fighting AGAINST all these years? 

 

Just hire the most qualified person please. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TSOL said:

 

 

Giving somebody a job based on their RACE and GENDER? I'm appalled... Isnt that what progressives and liberals have been fighting AGAINST all these years? 

 

Just hire the most qualified person please. 

But there are lots of quailed people. Why not pick someone that helps the court look more like the diverse country we are. 

 

I mean the Republicans don’t pick the most qualified, they pick who the corporate funded Federalist Society tells them to pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

But there are lots of quailed people. Why not pick someone that helps the court look more like the diverse country we are. 

 

I mean the Republicans don’t pick the most qualified, they pick who the corporate funded Federalist Society tells them to pick 

 

 

That is such horribly flawed logic. There are people from practically every nation in the world here in america. Should we have a supreme court justice to represent people of every nationality? Where do we draw the line? As long as we are giving out supreme court seats based on diversity? 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2021 at 8:16 PM, TSOL said:

 

 

That is such horribly flawed logic. There are people from practically every nation in the world here in america. Should we have a supreme court justice to represent people of every nationality? Where do we draw the line? As long as we are giving out supreme court seats based on diversity? 

 

 

To a lib, only the most superficial things about us matter. Namely, how we look. So what the Court looks like matters more than what they are there to do. Plus, they don’t like the Conservative majority so they want to change the rules and just add judges. They want judges to tear up the Constitution, not adhere to it. See the pattern? Don’t like the outcome of elections ? Change the rules to allow easy cheating. Don’t like the definition of a word? Change it. Don’t like the gender you were born as ? Change it ! Don’t like White people ? Teach them to hate themselves by forcing critical race theory curricula into schools. It never ends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2021 at 12:16 PM, Tiberius said:

But there are lots of quailed people. Why not pick someone that helps the court look more like the diverse country we are. 

 

I mean the Republicans don’t pick the most qualified, they pick who the corporate funded Federalist Society tells them to pick 

 

So let's fill the court with:

 

Black Conservative

Asian Conservative

Native American Conservative

White Conservative

Female Conservative

Male Conservative

Jewish Conservative

Christian Conservative 

Muslim Conservative

 

Hey Tibs....you're on to something here. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Pelosi's shrewd investments raise suspicions

by Kelly Sadler

 

Paul Pelosi, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, is one heck of a trader! He purchased about $10 million in Microsoft shares through call options on March 19th when the stock was trading at $230.35. Days later, Microsoft was awarded a contract by the U.S. Army valued at $22 billion and inked a deal to buy an artificial intelligence firm. It’s stock has soared about 12% since Mr. Pelosi’s initial investment.

(Snip)

But Mr. Pelosi’s good fortunes don’t stop there. Weeks before President Biden signed an executive order to replace the entire federal automobile fleet with electric cars, Mr. Pelosi bought up to $1 million in Tesla stock.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/14/paul-pelosis-shrewd-investments-raise-suspicions/

  • Shocked 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Mr. Pelosi's shrewd investments raise suspicions

by Kelly Sadler

 

Paul Pelosi, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, is one heck of a trader! He purchased about $10 million in Microsoft shares through call options on March 19th when the stock was trading at $230.35. Days later, Microsoft was awarded a contract by the U.S. Army valued at $22 billion and inked a deal to buy an artificial intelligence firm. It’s stock has soared about 12% since Mr. Pelosi’s initial investment.

(Snip)

But Mr. Pelosi’s good fortunes don’t stop there. Weeks before President Biden signed an executive order to replace the entire federal automobile fleet with electric cars, Mr. Pelosi bought up to $1 million in Tesla stock.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/14/paul-pelosis-shrewd-investments-raise-suspicions/

 

Should we review all the politicians on both sides of aisles or just Nancy?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Should we review all the politicians on both sides of aisles or just Nancy?

 

 

Every single one of them. 

 

Also add on a detailed accounting of where all our tax dollars have been spent every fiscal year.  Let's start with the past four.  I think if that were to ever happen we'd all ***** out pants.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/16/biden-harris-administration-to-ramp-up-experiments-using-aborted-baby-body-parts/

 

The Biden-Harris administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced it is reversing the Trump administration’s decision to end taxpayer funding for experimental research that uses fetal tissue derived from aborted babies.

 

Now it makes sense why they encourage abortions.

Sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...