Jump to content

Shocker: Trump received millions from foreign governments as POTUS


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Love how the cult transitioned to college records from birth certificates.  Such cute sheep.

 

Obama graduated magna ***** laude with a JD in Law from Harvard Law School - they don't just give those away.

 

Meanwhile, Trump's lawyers threatened his colleges over any leaks of is grades.

 

Pick your fn battles.

 

 

It really is hilarious how much they have moved the goal posts in the last five years.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A Florida Judge sanctioned former President Donald Trump and one of his attorneys Thursday, ordering them to pay nearly $1 million for filing what he said was a bogus lawsuit against Trump's 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and others.

In a blistering filing, U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks accused Trump of a “pattern of abuse of the courts" for filing frivolous lawsuits for political purposes, which he said "undermines the rule of law" and “amounts to obstruction of justice.”

“Here, we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose," he wrote.

 

 

Edited by nedboy7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chris farley said:

Civil court and due process.

 

ITs not like Hillary created process that was used by her to slander him.

 

And no way was she openly using the Russian asset narrative on tape that could be used as proof.

 

When is she getting sanctioned for hundreds of millions?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BillStime said:

🎯

 

image.thumb.jpeg.6f3ece1e9c1d20e5198f48b6509f836b.jpeg

Just saw this.  It's so very precious.  why are there no crying , laughing emojis?  WINNING!!!!!

6 hours ago, Chris farley said:

Civil court and due process.

 

ITs not like Hillary created process that was used by her to slander him.

 

And no way was she openly using the Russian asset narrative on tape that could be used as proof.

 

 

 

 

why do you believe this human waste is beneficial too you?

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Just saw this.  It's so very precious.  why are there no crying , laughing emojis?  WINNING!!!!!

why do you believe this human waste is beneficial too you?

 

TDS has taken full hold on this patient doc. I fear he is beyond help.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Just saw this.  It's so very precious.  why are there no crying , laughing emojis?  WINNING!!!!!

why do you believe this human waste is beneficial too you?

Kinda proves why we are a republic and have these due process rights.  If not the mob just goes for a pound of flesh, eh.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Funny. . . . . . . . . . we always see the (baseless) accusations quickly trumpeted (heh)  by the usual suspects here,

 

but they never seem to follow up.

 

 

Trump’s interior chief goes 4-0 in political show trials

by Paul Bedard

 

For a fourth time, former Trump-era Interior Secretary David Bernhardt has been cleared by the department's inspector general of ethics charges made by his political foes.

 

Bernhardt, the Interior chief from 2019-2021, was exonerated of breaking his ethics pledge in handling a project known as the California Central Valley Project.

 

In a report from the department’s ethics office just released, investigators said, “We did not substantiate any of the allegations regarding improper conduct by Mr. Bernhardt. We also concluded that the evidence did not support the complainants’ allegations regarding the [department’s ethics office] review of Mr. Bernhardt’s potential conflicts of interest.”

 

The report is titled "Allegations of Ethics Violations by Former U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Were Not Substantiated."

 

In February 2019, an ethics watchdog group and liberal Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Elizabeth Warren filed complaints claiming Bernhardt violated federal ethics rules by trying to weaken protections for fish to give California farmers access to water. They said he had earlier lobbied for the water district that stood to profit from the project.

 

As with three other earlier ethics complaints filed by his liberal critics and hyped by the media, Bernhardt was cleared. In the most notable case, he was cleared of playing a role in the U.S. Park Police emptying of Lafayette Park across the street from the White House of protesters so that former President Donald Trump could hold a photo-op at St. John's Church in 2020.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/trumps-interior-chief-goes-4-0-in-political-show-trials

 

https://www.doioig.gov/reports/investigation/allegations-ethics-violations-former-us-department-interior-secretary-were

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Strategy is clear.  He's a victim.  And the MAGA's will lap it up.  Just wondering why he was attracted to "horseface".  That's a tough one.

So you’re saying he just should’ve said it this way: “I never had sexual relations with that woman; Miss Daniels.” 
 

Yes, that’d have made it all better. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Strategy is clear.  He's a victim.  And the MAGA's will lap it up.  Just wondering why he was attracted to "horseface".  That's a tough one.

The cool thing is this.  The obsession with Trump where prosecutors identify the person and find the crime is costing a lot of taxpayer money while boosting the image of the DA with the liberal base and making a few lawyers some decent fees.  Nothing much else though.  NYS residents are just chumps bankrolling this crusade and electing these folks.  Will they ever wise up?  Doubtful. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

So you’re saying he just should’ve said it this way: “I never had sexual relations with that woman; Miss Daniels.” 
 

Yes, that’d have made it all better. 

Clinton didn't break any laws that I'm aware of.  The truth came out.  Trump likely broke the law by the manner Daniels was paid off.  And trump still insists it never happened.  Both actions were wrong.  One was not a crime.  no one should be above the law.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Clinton didn't break any laws that I'm aware of.  The truth came out.  Trump likely broke the law by the manner Daniels was paid off.  And trump still insists it never happened.  Both actions were wrong.  One was not a crime.  no one should be above the law.

It depends on what the meaning of is, is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Clinton didn't break any laws that I'm aware of.  The truth came out.  Trump likely broke the law by the manner Daniels was paid off.  And trump still insists it never happened.  Both actions were wrong.  One was not a crime.  no one should be above the law.

So it’s your opinion that having sex in the office with an INTERN doesn’t break any laws as long as he doesn’t give her any money to be quiet. The proper thing to do is trash the intern on national television and give her nothing. Unbelievable! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Clinton didn't break any laws that I'm aware of.  The truth came out.  Trump likely broke the law by the manner Daniels was paid off.  And trump still insists it never happened.  Both actions were wrong.  One was not a crime.  no one should be above the law.

Didn't Clinton commit perjury by saying under oath that he didn't engage in sexual relations with Lewinsky?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...