The War on Whiteness

[wppete]

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

3 hours ago, Rob's House said:

 

HA!

 

I FU¢KING CALLED IT!

 

 

More SNL this from Norm MacDonald's book "Based on a true story".  His top 25 jokes.

 

Number 15, Earlier this week, Marlon Bramdo, met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on The Larry King Show, among them that "Hollywood is run by Jews".   The Jewish leaders accepted the actor's apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again.

 

So newly revealed Jew hater and race baiter Nick came to his senses when he realized he'd never work again if he didn't apologize.  Pure and simple self-interest.   

Edited July 16, 2020 by All_Pro_Bills

[Rob's House]

The Nick Cannon Cover-up

 

The media has all but erased Nick Cannon's unambiguously racist statements about white people.

 

I asked my wife if she'd heard about his situation. She hadn't so I told her to look it up. 20 minutes later, after searching Bing and Yahoo, she only knows he said blacks are the real Hebrews and that Jews control the banks and media. She has not been able to find anything about what he said about white people. EVERY article omits that part entirely. 

 

Think about why that would be.

 

Walsh has been crushing it.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh-nick-cannon-just-demonstrated-that-racism-is-still-acceptable-in-america-as-long-as-its-anti-white

 

 

 

Edited July 18, 2020 by Rob's House

[Nanker]

 

[Tiberius]

Jeremy Roenick sues NBC sports, says he was fired for being a straight man. He wanted to speak at RNC convention for Trump, too. 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jeremy-roenick-sues-nbc-sports-224414977.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2FicmVzcGFjZS5jb20vY29tbXVuaXR5L3RvcGljLzI4MzgyLWplcmVteS1yb2VuaWNrLXN1ZXMtbmJjLXNwb3J0cy1mb3ItYW50aS1zdHJhaWdodC1kaXNjcmltaW5hdGlvbi1pbi1maXJpbmcv&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMZLXd32wEXIDUt3mhfhAo_Cc1CgmCpsvq13eGQvflh_G5rhq76Co-YtDZ86FNgXXrd0nHMnhCLNO9R2Ange2l9C97Ucbb4FbVa_aFkmd1HqVSAUZi6rPmw9TuUQzDevchmQ9CBh2EQBexPwJu9rnHbhm1RGs10mK4g3ehhviz8d

[Tiberius]

It’s safe to come out now, no one is really fighting a war against you 

[Rob's House]

 

Nick Cannon Shows Us Who is Really Privileged

By Gregory Hood

 

"Media sometimes call white advocates or race realists “white supremacists,” “Nazis,” or something close to terrorists. Still, I’ve never met a white advocate who believes his skin color gives him magic powers. I’ve never even heard of any anyone who believes white people are “gods” or who thinks blacks only do evil.

When it comes to who robs, rapes, kills, and fights, the evidence shows blacks do these things more often than whites. They are doing it especially enthusiastically right now because Black Lives Matter undermines police. Though whites are often victims, the melanin “soul” connection is certainly not strong enough to prevent black viciousness towards other blacks.

Mr. Cannon said that whites are “closer to animals” because of our race. If a white person said this about blacks, his podcast would be banned and he would be deplatformed.

...

Mr. Cannon hasn’t been “canceled.” He didn’t apologize to whites, nor was there pressure for him to do so. Fox is keeping him on the television program “Masked Singer.” His upcoming daytime program hasn’t been canceled, just delayed. Sean “Diddy” Combs offered him a job. “Charlamagne Tha God” defended him and spoke frankly about collective racial interests.

No one should be surprised by this. Fifty percent of black voters have a favorable opinion of Louis Farrakhan. Mr. Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are a black racial vanguard for their people. Blacks appreciate this. The mainstream media doesn’t, but mostly because Mr. Farrakhan keeps insulting Jews.

If he didn’t, he would probably get the same welcome Al Sharpton does today. 

...

It’s OK to hate whites. Anyone can insult us and get away with it. That is because most whites are not racially conscious and do not defend those who speak for them. At the same time, whites suffer far greater penalties if they speak in defense of their race, sometimes especially at the hands of conservatives.

White advocates face unprecedented deplatforming, legal persecution, and even physical attack. The mask is off."

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 20, 2020 by Rob's House

[Rob's House]

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-left-is-now-the-right

[Doc Brown]

On 7/16/2020 at 4:53 PM, All_Pro_Bills said:

More SNL this from Norm MacDonald's book "Based on a true story".  His top 25 jokes.

 

Number 15, Earlier this week, Marlon Bramdo, met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on The Larry King Show, among them that "Hollywood is run by Jews".   The Jewish leaders accepted the actor's apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again.

 

So newly revealed Jew hater and race baiter Nick came to his senses when he realized he'd never work again if he didn't apologize.  Pure and simple self-interest.   

By far the best Weekend Update guy.  His OJ jokes alone got him fired.

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest

 

ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion.

 

Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month.

“It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said.

 

Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? 

 

Or the Anarchist thread? 

 

[The Guy In Pants]

On 7/18/2020 at 7:01 AM, Nanker said:

 

 

***** Loony

[LB3]

29 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest

 

ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion.

 

Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month.

“It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said.

 

Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? 

 

Or the Anarchist thread? 

 

Honest question. Do you think the McCloskey's were in the wrong? 

[billsfan1959]

1 hour ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

St. Louis couple charged for pulling, waving guns at protest

 

ST. LOUIS (AP) — St. Louis’ top prosecutor on Monday charged white a husband and wife, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, with felony unlawful use of a weapon for displaying guns during a racial injustice protest outside their mansion.

 

Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner told The Associated Press that their actions risked creating a violent situation during an otherwise nonviolent protest last month.

“It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner — that is unlawful in the city of St. Louis,” Gardner said.

 

Or should this be in the Guns or No Guns thread? 

 

Or the Anarchist thread? 

 

 

You seem to be quite upset over a couple arming themselves on their own property, in a private community. Were you as upset when people armed themselves and actually took over private and public property?

 

 

Of course you weren't. Because you are an ideologue who who is incapable of entertaining any thought that is inconsistent with your mental rigidity. The slightest bit of cognitive dissonance might make your head explode.

 

You are like one of those dolls where you pull the string on her back and she cries, except you pull your own string, over and over and over and over...continually subjecting everyone to your incessant crying and whining.

 

Edited July 21, 2020 by billsfan1959

[Tiberius]

58 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

You seem to be quite upset over a couple arming themselves on their own property, in a private community. Were you as upset when people armed themselves and actually took over private and public property?

 

 

Of course you weren't. Because you are an ideologue who who is incapable of entertaining any thought that is inconsistent with your mental rigidity. The slightest bit of cognitive dissonance might make your head explode.

 

You are like one of those dolls where you pull the string on her back and she cries, except you pull your own string, over and over and over and over...continually subjecting everyone to your incessant crying and whining.

 

The McCloskeys were pointing the guns at people. That's crazy. 

[billsfan1959]

Just now, Tiberius said:

The McCloskeys were pointing the guns at people. That's crazy. 

 

And the armed people that took over the Wendy's and surrounding area in Atlanta shot numerous people, including shooting and killing an eight year old girl.

 

But, Yeah, what the McCloskeys did was far worse....

[Tiberius]

Just now, billsfan1959 said:

 

And the armed people that took over the Wendy's and surrounding area in Atlanta shot numerous people, including shooting and killing an eight year old girl.

 

But, Yeah, what the McCloskeys did was far worse....

That doesn't excuse what they did 

[billsfan1959]

Just now, Tiberius said:

That doesn't excuse what they did 

 

In one instance, people are armed on their property after a mob of people break through a gate into a private community. In the other instance, people are armed, take over private and public property, shoot a number of people, and ultimately shoot and kill a little girl. And that is your answer? To turn it back to what the McCloskeys did?

 

You have posted a number of times about the McCloskeys. Why don't you provide a link to your posts condemning the armed people that took over the Wendy's area and killed that little girl?

 

We'll wait.

[Tiberius]

Just now, billsfan1959 said:

 

In one instance, people are armed on their property after a mob of people break through a gate into a private community. In the other instance, people are armed, take over private and public property, shoot a number of people, and ultimately shoot and kill a little girl. And that is your answer? To turn it back to what the McCloskeys did?

 

You have posted a number of times about the McCloskeys. Why don't you provide a link to your posts condemning the armed people that took over the Wendy's area and killed that little girl?

 

We'll wait.

I'll post what I want. You can play whataboutism all you want. 

[LeviF]

The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd.  Don't @ me.

[Tiberius]

2 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd.  Don't @ me.

It's ok to point guns at people? 

And its a little war on whiteness if white people can't point guns at whoever they want. I bet those two eat it. They eat each others stuff. You know it 

[billsfan1959]

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I'll post what I want. You can play whataboutism all you want. 

 

Be my guest. You have the right to believe that armed individuals, forcibly stopping vehicles that drive through a public area and killing an eight year old girl is insignificant compared to two people arming themselves on their own property against a mob.

 

Pretty much sums up who you are.

 

9 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd.  Don't @ me.

 

In Tibs' world, two white people arming themselves on their property is something intolerable, while killing children is ok, as long as it is the right people doing the killing

 

Edited July 21, 2020 by billsfan1959

[LeviF]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It's ok to point guns at people? 

 

 

MO Title 38, Chapter 563:

 

A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person

 

A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless:

.

.

3. Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section.

[Tiberius]

7 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

MO Title 38, Chapter 563:

 

 

 

 

 

Defending themselves? Why, because they are white and there is a war on them? 

12 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

Be my guest. You have the right to believe that armed individuals, forcibly stopping vehicles that drive through a public area and killing an eight year old girl is insignificant compared to two people arming themselves on their own property against a mob.

 

Pretty much sums up who you are.

 

 

In Tibs' world, two white people arming themselves on their property is something intolerable, while killing children is ok, as long as it is the right people doing the killing

 

They are aiming guns at people. 

[billsfan1959]

Just now, Tiberius said:

They are aiming guns at people. 

 

I know Tibs. And we all understand how much more traumatic that is for you than the shooting and killing of an eight year old girl.

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

2 hours ago, LB3 said:

Honest question. Do you think the McCloskey's were in the wrong? 

 

***** (rhymes with duck) YES 

[LeviF]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Defending themselves? Why, because they are white and there is a war on them? 

 

 

Because a mob of the same people who've been burning their city for six years showed up on their private property.

 

Everyone keeps telling white folks to reflect on their whiteness and figure out what to do moving forward.  Well it's happening and I'm not sure your ilk is going to get the results they were looking for.

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

what they did was ILLEGAL.  

 

They also doctored film to make it look as if the peaceful protesters broke the gate when in fact they did not.  

This couple has a LONG history of being A holes !!! 

 

They destroyed property belonging to a church / place of worship and teaching in an adjoining property 

 

Edited July 21, 2020 by SlimShady'sSpaceForce

[LB3]

3 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

***** (rhymes with duck) YES 

Not the rioters who broke into their neighborhood?

 

I'm guessing you'd let them destroy your home and have a go at your wife, in the name of communi...errr... justice.

Edited July 21, 2020 by LB3

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Because a mob of the same people who've been burning their city for six years showed up on their private property.

 

Everyone keeps telling white folks to reflect on their whiteness and figure out what to do moving forward.  Well it's happening and I'm not sure your ilk is going to get the results they were looking for.

It was a protest. 

 

Should all protests be confronted with gun thugs? How Russian of you 

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

3 minutes ago, LB3 said:

Not the rioters who broke into their neighborhood?

 

I'm guessing you'd let them destroy your home and have a go at your wife, in the name of communi...errr... justice.

 

READ THE TRUTH  and not the truth the Borg Collective spreads 

 

They were  not rioters AND they did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood.  

 

Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com 

 

Edited July 21, 2020 by SlimShady'sSpaceForce

[LB3]

11 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

REAR THE TRUTH

 

They did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood.  

 

Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com 

 

They were let into the neighborhood? By who? 

 

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jun/30/what-we-know-about-st-louis-couple-who-pointed-gun/

 

Edit. I also never mentioned the gate in the post you quoted.

Edited July 21, 2020 by LB3

[Gary M]

6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

They were  not rioters AND they did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood.  

 

Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com 

 

 

So they never threatened the McCloskeys, or to burn the house or kill the dog?

[bilzfancy]

1 minute ago, Gary M said:

 

So they never threatened the McCloskeys, or to burn the house or kill the dog?

If they went to his house and did the same, he probably wouldn't do a thing because most liberals are wussys with a capital P

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

14 minutes ago, LB3 said:

They were let into the neighborhood? By who? 

 

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jun/30/what-we-know-about-st-louis-couple-who-pointed-gun/

 

Edit. I also never mentioned the gate in the post you quoted.

 

The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. 

[B-Man]

Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’

by Hank Berrien

 

Original Article

 

On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges.

 

The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians

[bilzfancy]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’

by Hank Berrien

 

Original Article

 

On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges.

 

The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians

Is it any surprise that Gardner is a Soros backed attorney?

[LB3]

6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. 

Video showed the gate intact. They said they saw them break the gate. They also said the rioters threatened to burn their house down and kill their dog.

 

You can believe the rioters. I'll believe the good citizens minding their business at home having dinner.

[billsfan1959]

5 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

 

The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. 

 

Yeah, I'm sure a large crowd of protesters in a private residential area, that didn't exactly move past the McCloskey's house, and against the backdrop of many protests turning violent had nothing to do with them feeling threatened.

 

BTW, you never answered my previous response to you: Where are your posts of outrage at the people in Atlanta that armed themselves, forcefully occupied private and public property, illegally stopped vehicles at gunpoint, shot several people, and, ultimately shot and killed an eight year old girl?

 

Or are you like Tibs and feel all of that is ok as long as the "right people" are arming themselves and committing violence?

[LeviF]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’

by Hank Berrien

 

Original Article

 

On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges.

 

The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians

 

Oh wow Levi was right again.  All the way from Alaska @3rdnlng

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Oh wow Levi was right again.  All the way from Alaska @3rdnlng

That has to have gone back a dozen years.