Jump to content

Mr. Trump's War


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

enhancement at the very least

 

i guess some dudes can have a full inch beard filled in with less than two weeks growth, he's not the right demographic though

 

his father lost his hair by his early 30s, i wouldn't be surprised if there's a ton of patch work going on with the son

 

 

 

image.png.9e37a6fe7e90413c68bf8d1f916bc1b6.png

The amount of hair is usually passed on through the mother's side and we all know Justin's mother had a carpet worthy of a Musk Oxen's coat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

The amount of hair is usually passed on through the mother's side and we all know Justin's mother had a carpet worthy of a Musk Oxen's coat. 

 

 

there's rules of thumb and then the randomness of reality comes into play, so the exceptions can be excused away, but it's not an exception when observation shows your hair potential is a flip of the coin.

 

actually this works on almost anything observable...  :D

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

 

there's rules of thumb and then the randomness of reality comes into play, so the exceptions can be excused away, but it's not an exception when observation shows your hair potential is a flip of the coin.

 

actually this works on almost anything observable...  :D

 

 

 

 

Well, good old Margaret certainly made it observable. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Well, good old Margaret certainly made it observable. 

 

it was the 70s doooooooooooooooooo.....

 

she had many moons to cultivate that display

 

i am in no position to posit theories for anyone else's situation.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it was the 70s doooooooooooooooooo.....

 

she had many moons to cultivate that display

 

i am in no position to posit theories for anyone else's situation.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I understand that Pierre was not her favorite bush pilot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i'll put this in @Tiberius's thread. so he can cry here.

 

thread.

https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1215600795602837505

 

Were we closer to war now or then? 

Was Iran building a bomb now or then? 

Is the whole  situation more dangerous now or then? 

 

Now is the answer to all three question. 

 

Why am I suppose to be crying? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Were we closer to war now or then? 

Was Iran building a bomb now or then? 

Is the whole  situation more dangerous now or then? 

 

Now is the answer to all three question. 

 

Why am I suppose to be crying? 

because there is one less terrorist in the world and it has become exponentially safer as a result?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Were we closer to war now or then? 

Was Iran building a bomb now or then? 

Is the whole  situation more dangerous now or then? 

 

Now is the answer to all three question. 

 

Why am I suppose to be crying? 

About the same 

probably both

about the same 

 

difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bakin said:

About the same 

probably both

about the same 

 

difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. 

Difference is that Iran has been separated from its proxies and is now being held responsible for not only the proxies but their own actions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, anita_03 said:

here I've found some info regarding war

 

:wacko:

This is what you do with your first post?

You quote someone who made a post (must have been from another thread) which predates this entire thread  You don't even quote it -- you delete the content of it so that nobody knows what you're responding to.  And your response is to link a news site that's in Spanish.

:blink:

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bakin said:

About the same 

probably both

about the same 

 

difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. 

Being closer to war, hostility and no diplomacy is the same as before? No, no it is not. You guys will say anything 

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

because there is one less terrorist in the world and it has become exponentially safer as a result?

There is also one less airliner, too. 

 

Iran making a bomb makes us safer? 

 

You guys--YOUR GUYS (politicians)--need to be thrown out of office. I hope this demographic shift taking places seriously causes the GOP to shrink and become impotent. You guys screamed Hillary is a warmonger while electing a clueless clown who is getting us back into the hot war game. The GOP must go! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

Who paid for it? 

 

Image result for obama pallets of cash

What do you care? You just want a war, right? And that won't pay for a nuke, anyway 

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb.  

I remember 2017 when international inspectors where in Iran certifying they were in compliance with the Obama deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb.  

 

reset the prediction it all the time, just like the glaciers melting away

 

and they never learn....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I remember 2017 when international inspectors where in Iran certifying they were in compliance with the Obama deal. 

HMMMM

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/09/13/549217764/should-nuclear-inspectors-be-demanding-access-to-irans-military-sites

 

FTA:  "Nobody is allowed to visit Iran's military sites," Ali Akbar Velayati told reporters in Iran recently, calling the push for such inspections a threat to its national security. Velayati is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gary M said:

HMMMM

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/09/13/549217764/should-nuclear-inspectors-be-demanding-access-to-irans-military-sites

 

FTA:  "Nobody is allowed to visit Iran's military sites," Ali Akbar Velayati told reporters in Iran recently, calling the push for such inspections a threat to its national security. Velayati is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

We know where the WMD are! We promise Iraq has WMD! 

 

Same crap, different decade 

 

They were in compliance, the Trump came along and said they were not. Trump, like the Bush administration want war. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Being closer to war, hostility and no diplomacy is the same as before? No, no it is not. You guys will say anything 

There is also one less airliner, too. 

 

Iran making a bomb makes us safer? 

 

You guys--YOUR GUYS (politicians)--need to be thrown out of office. I hope this demographic shift taking places seriously causes the GOP to shrink and become impotent. You guys screamed Hillary is a warmonger while electing a clueless clown who is getting us back into the hot war game. The GOP must go! 

 

 

Why let the facts get in the way of your narrative. 
Trump is the most peace loving, diplomatic president in a generation or more. 
He doesn’t want war. It would be bad for his business. And bad for the country. 

Neocons, Neolibs and the Military Industrial Complex / that is another story. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb.  

 

That was about the same time we were warned the ice caps were melting and America would be underwater soon.

 

Global warming cooling climate change crisis: Is there nothing it can do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

That was about the same time we were warned the ice caps were melting and America would be underwater soon.

 

Global warming cooling climate change crisis: Is there nothing it can do?

 

I'm still waiting to hear how the Iranians wouldn't have shot down that 737 if Trump hadn't pulled us out of the (non--binding, unratified) Paris Accords.

1 hour ago, Bakin said:

Neocons, Neolibs and the Military Industrial Complex / that is another story. 

 

And the reptoids.  Don't forget the reptoids.  

 

And the pedophiles.  And child sex traffickers.  Goddamn child sex trafficking pedophile reptoids.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

No wonder Trump can’t explain and real reason they conducted the strike 

 

 

  • President Donald Trump told associates that he assassinated Iran's top military leader last week in part to appease Republican senators who will play a crucial role in his Senate impeachment trial, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

I’m with you, but don’t subscribe to the Wall Street Journal. 
 

Since the allegation is serious enough to impact the election, can you tell me who the source(s)  are by name,  the proof provided that Trump made the comments attributed to him, and the names of the senators that were appeased.  I will research independently thereafter. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...