Jump to content

Mr. Trump's War


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

So, the advantage of tearing up the Obama Iran nuclear deal was what? You made a nice pro Trump statement but didn't answer the question.  Please, try again.

 

Except for the satisfaction of undoing Obama's presidency, what was the advantage of tearing up the agreement?

The former agreement was useless. Trump wants a new one that will actually prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. In addition, Trump wants to stop Iran from fomenting terrorism around the world. How could anyone not agree with those goals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, westside2 said:

Perfect example of why you should never post when you're stoned off your gourd.

What's your excuse? Straight up drunk? 

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

The former agreement was useless. Trump wants a new one that will actually prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. In addition, Trump wants to stop Iran from fomenting terrorism around the world. How could anyone not agree with those goals?

Useless? They were not building a bomb. Now they are. Heck of a job, Trumpy 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

What's your excuse? Straight up drunk? 

Useless? They were not building a bomb. Now they are. Heck of a job, Trumpy 

"There are none so blind than those who refuse to see". They've been seeking out nuclear weapons for decades and have gone to great lengths to hide it. They saw a weakness with Obama as president and exploited it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The former agreement was useless. Trump wants a new one that will actually prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. In addition, Trump wants to stop Iran from fomenting terrorism around the world. How could anyone not agree with those goals?

 

No patriotic American could disagree with those goals.  But, again, what was gained by tearing up the agreement?  A solution for one of those goals was in place for the next 10 years or so before Trump tore up the nuclear deal, recreating the original problem.  

 

Why didn't Trump get back the pallets of cash if we gave back the limitations?.  Right, he couldn't.  So, why not keep what we had gained then too?  The answer you want I think is : EGO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

No patriotic American could disagree with those goals.  But, again, what was gained by tearing up the agreement?  A solution for one of those goals was in place for the next 10 years or so before Trump tore up the nuclear deal, recreating the original problem.  

 

Why didn't Trump get back the pallets of cash if we gave back the limitations?.  Right, he couldn't.  So, why not keep what we had gained then too?  The answer you want I think is : EGO.

There was no solution in place, only empty promises. We had gained nothing that we wanted to keep. New sanctions on Iran are the only hope to get them to give up terrorism and gaining nuclear weapons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

"There are none so blind than those who refuse to see". They've been seeking out nuclear weapons for decades and have gone to great lengths to hide it. They saw a weakness with Obama as president and exploited it. 

There were international inspectors on the ground there certifying they were in compliance. So you just want to pretend that was not true? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There were international inspectors on the ground there certifying they were in compliance. So you just want to pretend that was not true? 

they were only allowed to inspect certain areas. sheesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Foxx said:

they were only allowed to inspect certain areas. sheesh.

Yes, the areas they could make nuclear material.

 

So you say they were still building a bomb, just because you know and everyone else--Aside from Trump!--was lying. 

 

You guys 

Image result for head up your butt

 

2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

this belongs in tibsey's thread as well...

 

?

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1214239229594734595

 

 

as opposed to secret Star Chamber hearings?? huh huh???

 

Will Trump officials come to testify, or is the military now their private army? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I want this to happen.  It would be hilarious.

 

witnesses just sit there and every time Schiff asks a question, burst into laughter, or let off an airhorn for 5 seconds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

witnesses just sit there and every time Schiff asks a question, burst into laughter, or let off an airhorn for 5 seconds

 

And eat big sandwiches in front of them. Slurping down Big Gulps and loudly chewing bubble gum - once in awhile popping bubbles with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

witnesses just sit there and every time Schiff asks a question, burst into laughter, or let off an airhorn for 5 seconds

 

Like how the Nazis shut down the Reichstag in 1930's, making Constitutional government impossible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nanker said:

And eat big sandwiches in front of them. Slurping down Big Gulps and loudly chewing bubble gum - once in awhile popping bubbles with it. 

 

take a page from the genius Saul Alinksy and all the witnesses should eat a can of beans before testifying and let it rip the whole afternoon

 

what a genius Saul was...  :(

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

Useless? They were not building a bomb. Now they are. Heck of a job, Trumpy 

 

Frankly the strategy of letting them develop nuke capability then us blowing it to smithereens is more sensible than a 10 year agreement which set the calendar for future development of a nuke and gave us almost nothing else in return.    

 

 

 

47 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I want this to happen.  It would be hilarious.

 

Bank on it happening.  Schiff finds himself with nothing else to do at the moment.

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, keepthefaith said:

 

Frankly the strategy of letting them develop nuke capability then us blowing it to smithereens is more sensible than a 10 year agreement which set the calendar for future development of a nuke and gave us almost nothing else in return.    

I wish we could just press a button and turn them into a democratic/republic. Most Iranians would like this too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...