Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

When is shifty shiff firing off  today's ied

The explosive bombshells yesterday were so damaging !!

uh oh.. n s a may be kicking in my door before the day is done now :(

cnn said it not me just repeating what a i heard!

Edited by Albwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Because he, along with Tibs , Gary and the rest  ar part of the Soros cubicle farm.  I really don't remember Tibs posting anything inTSW or Off The Wall

I actually did see Tibs in a game day thread once. He obviously forgot to log out and back in under his football discussion nom de plume. 

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

This is gonna be a "good one" today when David Holmes sneered the name "Kardashian" (in reference to asking Trump to help with an American citizen) in his opening statement. Another gatekeeper of US foreign policy is my guess.  Who knows though, I could be wrong.

(And for the record, I had to look up how to spell Kardashian and do not follow their brand, but I am not a person representing US citizens, which this dweeb is supposedly doing.)

Another career diplomat who is incensed that they weren't running foreign policy. 

4 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

If anyone can tell me what law President Trump broke, and support it with even a plausible argument, I will create a sign line praising your wisdom, and leave it up for 6 months.

They hate him. He's a literal hate crime. #Impeach!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

alright. i had hoped that you would have an honest discussion but i see that that is not going to happen. that or you are simply too dense and obtuse to have an honest discussion with.

 

have a great day.

 

It's not that he's dense. He just refuses to accept what is really happening.

 

It's like going to the Bills board after the Miami game and finding people complaining that Josh didn't have a 300-yard game yet.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

EJ5bCBPWwAA3ZYH.jpg

 

Didn't Trump ask to get the DNC server (Crowdstrike) that he believes is in Ukraine?  I don’t think he was looking for evidence of Ukrainian interference. Just where the server is and how it might have gotten there. 

 

How is that morphing into Ukraine election meddling?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wacka said:

I thought changing your testimony is perjury?

 

new information provided during testimony can allow one to change their opinion

 

or found out after one has issued their Report, filled with many clever CYA lines.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Who gave him that idea?

 

Rhino, duh !!

 

Who cares who gave him that idea?  If the server isn’t there then it is a very short investigation, right?

 

 

 

Edited by snafu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rob's House said:

If anyone can tell me what law President Trump broke, and support it with even a plausible argument, I will create a sign line praising your wisdom, and leave it up for 6 months.

Look, isn't it obvious? He broke the moral law by defeating Madam President and then he broke the law of the Deep State Constant which is practically the same as gravity and then he broke the law of ingratiating himself to the people that count (i.e., not the flyover deplorables clinging to religion and guns) and finally he broke the law of surrender which has been the GOP appeasement policy since Reagan left office.

Edited by Dr. Who
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, westside2 said:

You're an idiot. You keep spouting the same rhetoric knowing full well that you're lieing your ass off. You don't give a Schiff about the country. Why are you defending those crooks is beyond me.

He doesn't, he doesn't even live in the USA!

 

He spells check, cheque, nobody that lives in the USA spells check that way not even by mistake do "we" spell check that way. He's an argumentative uninformed, ignorant troll!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pop gun said:

He doesn't, he doesn't even live in the USA!

 

He spells check, cheque, nobody that lives in the USA spells check that way not even by mistake do "we" spell check that way. He's an argumentative uninformed, ignorant troll!

 

Pretty sure he is Canadian

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right?

 

Holmes just explained.

 

It lifts attention off Russia's interference in the US election, drives a wedge between US and Ukraine diplomatic relations, and makes it easier for Russia to try and regain Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. 

 

In other words, it goes against US Foreign Policy. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

If anyone can tell me what law President Trump broke, and support it with even a plausible argument, I will create a sign line praising your wisdom, and leave it up for 6 months.

I'm not sure about any actual law being broken. I do however think American lives might be put at risk when you press for an announcement of an investigation on a fellow American in a country already known for its corruption. The course of an election may have also been altered.  

 

With all due respect to one of my favorite PPP posters@ Rob's House

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Holmes just explained.

 

It lifts attention off Russia's interference in the US election, drives a wedge between US and Ukraine diplomatic relations, and makes it easier for Russia to try and regain Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. 

 

In other words, it goes against US Foreign Policy. 

lol. your not serious.

 

the US President set US Foreign Policy. does he not? or are you asserting that unelected officials do?

 

you probably should quit while you're behind at this point. you can't possibly believe the nonsense you spout.

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

lol. your not serious. the US President set US Foreign Policy. does he not? or are you asserting that unelected officials do?

 

you probably should quit while you're behind at this point.

 

Literally every single diplomat that has testified over the past 4 days has said that it was US policy to help protect Ukraine from Russia, so that Russia couldn't expand its power and sphere of influence globally.

 

That's what their directives were, and they're all testifying that Guiliani, Trump's personal lawyer, was actively working to undermine the work they were doing. 

Edited by jrober38
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

 

Literally every single diplomat that has testified over the past 4 days has said that it was US policy to help protect Ukraine from Russia, so that Russia couldn't expand it's power and sphere of influence.

 

That's what their directives were, and they're all testifying that Guiliani, Trump's personal lawyer, was actively working to undermine the work they were doing. 

 

Who sets US policy?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Who sets US policy?

 

Trump does.

 

It probably would have been helpful if all US diplomats knew what Trump's policy actually was in Ukraine.

 

All of them seem to think it was something different than what Guiliani was working on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Didn't Trump ask to get the DNC server (Crowdstrike) that he believes is in Ukraine?  I don’t think he was looking for evidence of Ukrainian interference. Just where the server is and how it might have gotten there. 

 

How is that morphing into Ukraine election meddling?

 

GarBoTibs is desperate to rush a talking point -- even when it's laughably wrong -- when his masters tell him "BOOM!"

 

He's a fool. As he keeps proving over and over again. Not worth your time or engagement. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right?

 

It hasn't been disproven. The only argument being lobbed by the GarBoTibs and their ilk is that ONLY Russia interfered in the 2016 election. We know this is false, and we know the Ukraine absolutely played a part (as did many other countries, including our own IC). 

 

That's their argument. 

 

And it's laughably ignorant -- which is why low information NPCs are drawn to it like moths to a flame. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It hasn't been disproven. The only argument being lobbed by the GarBoTibs and their ilk is that ONLY Russia interfered in the 2016 election. We know this is false, and we know the Ukraine absolutely played a part (as did many other countries, including our own IC). 

 

That's their argument. 

 

And it's laughably ignorant -- which is why low information NPCs are drawn to it like moths to a flame. 

thanks. though my question was mainly rhetorical, your response helps (?) the NPC crowd.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...