SoCal Deek Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 I’m not able to watch this circus but did this Hill lady really suggest that the country shouldn’t waste its time on politically driven false narratives? Holy crap lady! We just spent $40 million and 3 years investigating a FALSE NARRATIVE. Has she been living under a rock? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just now, SoCal Deek said: I’m not able to watch this circus but did this Hill lady really suggest that the country shouldn’t waste its time on politically driven false narratives? Holy crap lady! We just spent $40 million and 3 years investigating a FALSE NARRATIVE. Has she been living under a rock? So because one happened, it's okay to do it again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Yeah, seeing Big Stuff on the screen caused some flashbacks as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 just doing a little bit of reading on Watergate.... so the House did not bother to vote on Articles of Impeachment, which would have been a foregone conclusion, and the Senate began it's hearings anyway? So the Senate at any time can start a hearing in this process? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, jrober38 said: So because one happened, it's okay to do it again? No. You don’t get it. It is okay to find out who pushed the false narrative, how did they push it, and why. So it never happens again. That’s not a conspiracy or a false narrative, that’s an investigation. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, snafu said: No. You don’t get it. It is okay to find out who pushed the false narrative, how did they push it, and why. So it never happens again. That’s not a conspiracy or a false narrative, that’s an investigation. It's amazing this is so difficult to grasp for people who claim to be interested in truth above partisan politics. It's almost like they've been programmed to reject this (logical) premise by the media outlets they get their information from. Which, would make sense, since those same media outlets are DESPERATE to avoid asking this question because it would expose their role in KNOWINGLY pushing a lie and disinformation onto the public on the behalf of the coup plotters and their IC sources. Can't let the NPCs know how curated their reality is... nope. That would be "dangerous". Edited November 21, 2019 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, snafu said: No. You don’t get it. It is okay to find out who pushed the false narrative, how did they push it, and why. So it never happens again. That’s not a conspiracy or a false narrative, that’s an investigation. he's not capable of following an argument beyond "yes i want fries with that, jrober!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 back to Russia again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Does anyone know who holds the record for the most hail Marys intercepted in the end zone? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's amazing this is so difficult to grasp for people who claim to be interested in truth above partisan politics. It's almost like they've been programmed to reject this (logical) premise by the media outlets they get their information from. Which, would make sense, since those same media outlets are DESPERATE to avoid asking this question because it would expose their role in KNOWINGLY pushing a lie and disinformation onto the public on the behalf of the coup plotters and their IC sources. Can't let the NPCs know how curated their reality is... nope. That would be "dangerous". It is unfortunate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Rob's House said: Does anyone know who holds the record for the most hail Marys intercepted in the end zone? want it to be Leonard Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 21 minutes ago, jrober38 said: So because one happened, it's okay to do it again? no. it's all about context and she is being disingenuous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 45 minutes ago, jrober38 said: I own Black Rock mutual funds. Am I tied to Ukraine? Lieing comes naturally to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 That's all you need for a kangaroo court Trump impeachment based on unreliable presumptions, rumor and innuendo – Not facts by Gregg Jarrett Original Article The House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearing Wednesday posed a conundrum. Better yet, let’s call it a riddle. When is a “quid pro quo” not a “quid pro quo?” The answer is … when it’s “presumed.” U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testified that there was a “quid pro quo” between the U.S. and Ukraine, even though President Trump made it crystal clear to Sondland that there was no “quid pro quo.” So, how did the ambassador arrive at his opinion that a “quid pro quo” must somehow exist? It turns out that he assumed or “presumed” it. At one point, he called it a mere “guess.” ? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, Rob's House said: Does anyone know who holds the record for the most hail Marys intercepted in the end zone? i'll take... who is JRober for $5, Alex. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Mark Meadows: Impeachment hearing produced this 'real bombshell' by Vandana Rambaran Original Article GOP Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, hammered America's ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, during Wednesday's testimony, seizing on Sondland's admission that he never heard the president or anyone else in the White House explicitly link Ukrainian aid with the opening of an investigation into 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., applauded his colleague on producing "the real bombshell" of Sondland's long-anticipated testimony and marked the moment as "game over," for the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'll take... who is JRober for $5, Alex. Sorry, we were looking for Adam Schiff. However, over the break our judges determined we will accept your answer. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rob's House said: Sorry, we were looking for Adam Schiff. However, over the break our judges determined we will accept your answer. thanks for the consideration. it really was a toss up and i went for the lessor of the two evils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 . 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 Fredo doing Fredo things. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 there's a mole or two at CNN putting up these hilarious graphics, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, jrober38 said: I own Black Rock mutual funds. Am I tied to Ukraine? You're at least as "dirty" as Jeff Sessions. You can follow his example and recuse yourself from the discussion. 29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Now they're doing internal polling to see if they can't just pass a Censure of POTUS because Russia Collussion/Obstruction/#HE'S GOING TO FIRE MUELLER/BRIBERY/TIT-FOR-TAT/#DENIEDUKIEPRESAWHITEHOUSEVISIT/Held up Ukie aid/Gave money for missiles - not blakets and MREs/and... SHUTUP! 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Six years ago today, the Revilution of Dignity began 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Cool, your usual stupidity,be but glad you are not spreading the Russian narrative like DR and Moscow Gal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, pop gun said: He doesn't, he doesn't even live in the USA! He spells check, cheque, nobody that lives in the USA spells check that way not even by mistake do "we" spell check that way. He's an argumentative uninformed, ignorant troll! I sent you a pm. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 56 minutes ago, jrober38 said: So because one happened, it's okay to do it again? In politics and governance, which rests on precedent? Absolutely. Even our laws work this way. Once precedent is established, turnabout is fair-play. This is why what the left is doing is so short sighted. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 This will come up (a lot I assume) during the GOP round: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: No, but you should switch to Vanguard funds Promote that Russian narrative Giving financial advice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Giving financial advice? I guess 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Doing Putins work huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) getting ready to resume. *********************************** thread... https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1197544376299212800 Edited November 21, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, jrober38 said: I was never certain EJ would be good. My argument throughout the summer between his 1st and 2nd year was that the average QB improved quite substantially, and since EJ didn't have a terribly bad rookie season statistically, if he just did what the average QB did from year 1 to year 2, he'd be pretty good. The average QB improved their QB rating by something like 15 points. That didn't happen, and accordingly my opinion changed. Weeks 1-4 of his second season were the worst QB play we've seen from a starting Bills QB since JP Losman's first year. He was flat out horrible. Otherwise your memory is relatively accurate. Hmmmn, he also said this: Jrober started off as the ultimate EJ fanboy. He maintained his devout allegiance for the longest time. This man loved him some EJ like Mitch McConnell loves him a big pile of blow. If you'd gone to kick EJ in the nuts you'd have hit jrober in the head. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, Foxx said: getting ready to resume. *********************************** thread... https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1197544376299212800 Oh, that is the part I am waiting for!! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Oh, that is the part I am waiting for!! They waxed her stache during the break?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts