Jump to content

Democrat Debates


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

IN OTHER NEWS:.............................NO SHE CANNOT.

 

 

 

 

 

.

To speak with a forked tongue means to tell lies, to not be truthful, to be deceptive. To speak with a forked tongue may be interpreted as saying one thing but meaning another. It is an insult to tell someone that he is speaking with a forked tongue, as it is the same as calling someone a liar. Almost all authorities believe that the metaphor of a forked tongue refers to the forked tongue of a snake. A snake’s forked tongue is also called a bifurcated tongue. The snake uses his tongue to activate his vomeronasal system or his sense of smell. The bifurcation allows the snake to have a three-dimensional experience of smell. The origins of the idea of the forked tongue meaning to tell lies is at least five hundred years old, and is probably derived from the image of Satan as a snake, as depicted in the Adam and Eve story in the Old Testament. In the story, Satan appears to Eve as a snake and talks her into sinning or going against the will of God. He does this by telling her lies and appealing to her curiosity and hubris. The expression forked tongue meaning speaking deceptively or lying is first seen in the early 1500s, predating the first English settlement in America by about one hundred years. The term speak with a forked tongue became more popular in the 1700s, at which time it was ascribed to a translation of a Native American idiom. It is possible that such an idiom existed in some Native American languages, though it is just as likely that it was the English speakers who gave the term to the Native Americans. For a culture that does not revile the snake, the term speak with a forked tongue may be interpreted as to speak with two tongues, which could indicate to say one thing and mean another.

 

https://grammarist.com/idiom/speak-with-a-forked-tongue/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

She wouldn't shake his hand, all the Bernie Bros are pissed (online at least): 

:lol: 

 

***********

Thanks for the campaign ad, Mr. Walnut Sauce. 

 

Image

Image

What is that...remedial tic-tac-toe?

Edited by Kevbeau
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevbeau said:

What is that...remedial tic-tac-toe?

It's his reminder to himself to always tell the truth, he says. 

 

Guess snapping a rubber band on his wrist wasn't working.

 

Wonder where else he draws on his body. Umm, maybe not.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

They're not even pretending to be objective anymore.

Could be just a bad/robotic debate monitor having prepared questions unable to adjust on the fly.  This whole Bernie is a sexist narrative Warren's campaign is trying to create to energize democratic female voters is going to backfire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, /dev/null said:

 

They're not even pretending to be objective anymore.

 

It was just gear shifting from one person's story to another's. This is a nothing story, but Warren is trying to do a Kamela Harris move and get some traction from attacking the frontrunner. It's her last hope to grasp the edge of the cliff before she falls off.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

They're not even pretending to be objective anymore.

 

It was one of the more dishonest displays outside of a JA post.

4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Could be just a bad/robotic debate monitor having prepared questions unable to adjust on the fly.  This whole Bernie is a sexist narrative Warren's campaign is trying to create to energize democratic female voters is going to backfire.

 

How can you give them any benefit of the doubt after how they've treated Bernie this whole time? CNN is anti-Bernie. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V CTRL-V 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharing information scares JA -- because he's not a serious person. He wants to be drip fed information from "approved sources", the same ones that have a shite track record. He thinks this makes him smart -- but all his posts prove it does the opposite. 

 

Be better than JA. Don't get tweaked by information. Read it instead.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Sharing information scares JA -- because he's not a serious person. He wants to be drip fed information from "approved sources", the same ones that have a shite track record. He thinks this makes him smart -- but all his posts prove it does the opposite. 

 

Be better than JA. Don't get tweaked by information. Read it instead.

 

DR-CopyPaste: go post a Q-drop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proving how scared he is of information. 

 

And thinking for himself. 

 

One would think that if you were shown to be wrong, over and over again, as JA has been these past several years, a person would change how he gets his information. But not JA. He doubled down with the same den of vipers because he lacks the intellectual courage to think for himself. 

 

He thinks that makes him smart. 

 

But it proves he's a coward with a broken brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

How can you give them any benefit of the doubt after how they've treated Bernie this whole time? CNN is anti-Bernie. 

Because it was too obvious.

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Ahhhhh, that takes the Democrat party back...............

 

 

stg011520dAPR20200115014601.jpg

 

 

.

Even with an all white crew it was still the first potential gay, Jewish, and Native American nominee for a major party.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They've never really hidden their contempt for him. Ever since '16. I just am surprised that you're willing to cut them slack when they've earned none. Especially when it comes to their coverage of Bernie's campaign itself. 

I agree but Bill Belichick isn't going to show up to a Bills practice with binoculars.

 

They hate him and I actually thought this whole Warren/Bernie controversy was ginned up by a Hillary corporate Dem type.  Who knows.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Because it was too obvious.

Even with an all white crew it was still the first potential gay, Jewish, and Native American nominee for a major party.

 

Unless you count James Buchannen, who was likely a gay President.

And if you include VP nominations, Joseph Lieberman is Jewish.  And then there's Charles Curtis, 31st Vice President of the United States and 1/8 Native American, which is exponentially more Native American than Elizabeth Warren.

 

Hell, the Wiki page for Native American politicians doesn't even include Warren :lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Native_American_politicians

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...