Jump to content

No Women's World Cup thread?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jukester said:

Should be a classic game today - prime time under the lights in Paris in front of a very partisan crowd. USA will need to be much better than they were against Spain.  

 

Spain had one good scoring chance to go along with the bonehead play that lead to the goal. US will have to play well but it’s the right game for them to come out with the A game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm...where should one pregame and watch this match? 3.00PM on a sweltering hot Friday afternoon, all kinds of young , adult ladies with no layers on rooting like crazy and jumping up and down....definitely a game to watch in a bar somewheres!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

Hmm...where should one pregame and watch this match? 3.00PM on a sweltering hot Friday afternoon, all kinds of young , adult ladies with no layers on rooting like crazy and jumping up and down....definitely a game to watch in a bar somewheres!

I got the green light from my boss to check out at 2:50 today. Hammer down to the watering hole by 3:05. Should have some beer and grub by 3:15 and cruise into a 9 day weekend......also saw on the news this morning that it could reach 105° in France today. Not sure if or how that gives anyone an advantage. 

Edited by RaoulDuke79
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

I got the green light from my boss to check out at 2:50 today. Hammer down to the watering hole by 3:05. Should have some beer and grub by 3:15 and cruise into a 9 day weekend......also saw on the news this morning that it could reach 105° in France today. Not sure if or how that gives anyone an advantage. 

 

85 at kickoff. Not ideal but should not be decisive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, stony said:

Yup. Kinda just sucks for everyone.

 

I’m curious to see if France plays the same high line as Spain did. I don’t think that was what kept it close but it did help. If they do, maybe Ellis brings in Press (not my favorite) for speed. Press lacks finishing quality but she is fast as heck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

I’m curious to see if France plays the same high line as Spain did. I don’t think that was what kept it close but it did help. If they do, maybe Ellis brings in Press (not my favorite) for speed. Press lacks finishing quality but she is fast as heck. 

Yeah, the front three haven't really been at their best since Thailand.  I like Press because she's always willing to make the run.  If you're a defender that sucks knowing it only takes a split second to 'flip off' and you're f***ed.  If France does push the D up, I'd like midfield to have Horan and Mewis.  Both have the range to flip the field effectivelyand help create width.  Maybe put Ertz into the defense? Really curious what Ellis decides to do.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

 

I say start Carly Lloyd.......instead of off the bench.

Morgan seems off, I'm good w that.  

 

Reports saying Horan on bench.  Ellis gets in her own way too much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Hats off to the French squad, they pressed it all game. That said, the US side deserved it entirely. Should have been a finals matchup. 

Except for that #6 in the French squad.  Screw her!!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USA better most of the game. France’s goal capped off a bad stretch and after that there were few threats. Stoppage time was a f-en clinic. 

 

Ertz dropping into defense again shut downbeat France for most of the game and was a smart move. Morgan put consistent pressure on them. 

 

Lalas is is an idiot for his love of Dunn. She got owned in the first half and nearly gave up a critical goal in the second. Two games in a row where she wAs a consistent weak spot. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I finally ran into an article that actually digs into the discrepancy between the mens and womens pay.  The article tried to be anti-mens team, but it revealed what I had figured the situation was.  The MWC has prize money of $38M and the WWC is $4M ($2M when they signed their deal)....................So, the US federation or whatever it's called gets WAYYY the ***** less from FIFA to pay them.  

 

The women get salaries.  The men is all based on bonuses (which the women also get - but they actually DID get because they won the WC and the men didn't even make it!)  So, it's the bonuses that are unequal - due to the amount brought into FIFA being way different.  

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2019/jun/28/revealed-the-731003-gender-pay-gap-in-us-world-cup-bonuses  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bbb said:

So, I finally ran into an article that actually digs into the discrepancy between the mens and womens pay.  The article tried to be anti-mens team, but it revealed what I had figured the situation was.  The MWC has prize money of $38M and the WWC is $4M ($2M when they signed their deal)....................So, the US federation or whatever it's called gets WAYYY the ***** less from FIFA to pay them.  

 

The women get salaries.  The men is all based on bonuses (which the women also get - but they actually DID get because they won the WC and the men didn't even make it!)  So, it's the bonuses that are unequal - due to the amount brought into FIFA being way different.  

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2019/jun/28/revealed-the-731003-gender-pay-gap-in-us-world-cup-bonuses  

The FIFA allocated prize money has nothing to do with what US Soccer choses to pay the respective teams.  It is simply what the tournament awards teams who win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stony said:

The FIFA allocated prize money has nothing to do with what US Soccer choses to pay the respective teams.  It is simply what the tournament awards teams who win.  

 

Did you read the article?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stony said:

Yup

 

So, do you disagree with what I typed?:

 

The MWC has prize money of $38M and the WWC is $4M ($2M when they signed their deal)....................So, the US federation or whatever it's called gets WAYYY the ***** less from FIFA to pay them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What in the ***** was going on with the way the game ended................They already went past the 5 minute injury time allotment..............Clock keeps going and ref doesn't call the game.  Both teams just keep lining up for the inbounds.  It's taking 10, 15, 20 seconds................And, then they call the game.  Why not just call it when the ball was out of bounds with 5 minutes left............No buzzer beaters in this sport, because there is no buzzer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water ..hydration.. breaks are mandated in FIFA matches when the Wet Bulb Globe temperature exceeds 32*C. (89.6*F)

The breaks occur at the 30th and 75th minutes of the match.  This was approved by the FIFA executive committee and came into play

at the 2014 WC in Brazil.  Just wait until 2020 and Qatar.   Water breaks on turf pitches are even more important (MLS)  as the temp on the

field will be approx. 20*F  hotter than at chest level.

At the High school level we'll take a break at roughly the 20 minute mark of the 40 minute half. 80*F is our

break temperature.  This is discussed with the coaches and I have never heard one say NO

to a water break.  The safety of the players is the number one concern for all officials at all levels of play.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...