Jump to content

The Mueller Report. BREAKING NEWS: AG’s Summary Report Released. NO COLLUSION!


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

The democrats truly have dazzling arguments

 

"Just wait til they get going"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CNN desperately trying to explain why the foreign-sourced dossier is "different" than what Stephanopoulos asked Trump about.

They didn't do a very good job.

 

It is different in one huge way: Hillary didn’t merely accept information from foreigners. She paid them for it.

 

:lol:

https://twitter.com/RadGeekpartduex/status/1139223640925360128

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Hey Nancy, why not take up a bill to fund border security and funding for more facilities to house the people who are crossing the border because of the other ***** laws you won't pass. Do something for the good of the country not for you and your ilk's power, you CU Next Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I have this image of Barr and Trump laughing over drinks at this.  

Actually, they are backtracking 

 

Trump rushes into damage control after saying he’d accept foreign help in 2020

The president, who said he talks to foreign leaders every day, turned to his familiar tactic of blaming the media.

 

By ANDREW RESTUCCIA

 

06/13/2019 10:36 AM EDT

 

Updated 06/13/2019 12:53 PM EDT

President Donald Trump and his senior advisers moved quickly on Thursday to downplay and muddle his explosive assertion that he might not report to the FBI offers of election help from a foreign entity.

As Trump's Democratic opponents eviscerated him and one of his leading Republican supporters called his comments a "mistake," the president tried to recast his remarks, drawing a misleading comparison between accepting dirt from a foreign agent and his recent conversations with Queen Elizabeth and other world leaders.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/13/trump-tweet-interference-1363403

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Actually, they are backtracking 

 

Trump rushes into damage control after saying he’d accept foreign help in 2020

The president, who said he talks to foreign leaders every day, turned to his familiar tactic of blaming the media.

 

By ANDREW RESTUCCIA

 

06/13/2019 10:36 AM EDT

 

Updated 06/13/2019 12:53 PM EDT

President Donald Trump and his senior advisers moved quickly on Thursday to downplay and muddle his explosive assertion that he might not report to the FBI offers of election help from a foreign entity.

As Trump's Democratic opponents eviscerated him and one of his leading Republican supporters called his comments a "mistake," the president tried to recast his remarks, drawing a misleading comparison between accepting dirt from a foreign agent and his recent conversations with Queen Elizabeth and other world leaders.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/13/trump-tweet-interference-1363403

No, you disingenuous ****head, you're conflating both having "dirt" given to a campaign and a foreign government trying to interfere with an election. There was no reason to report the Trump Tower meeting to the FBI because the Russian contingent didn't attempt to do anything illegal. They had nothing on Clinton and only wanted to talk about the Magnitsky Act and the moratorium on adoptions. When Don Jr. realized this he left the meeting. This has been known for a year or two and has been explained to you many times. Are you just too ***** dumb to understand that or just don't care?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

No, you disingenuous ****head, you're conflating both having "dirt" given to a campaign and a foreign government trying to interfere with an election. There was no reason to report the Trump Tower meeting to the FBI because the Russian contingent didn't attempt to do anything illegal. They had nothing on Clinton and only wanted to talk about the Magnitsky Act and the moratorium on adoptions. When Don Jr. realized this he left the meeting. This has been known for a year or two and has been explained to you many times. Are you just too ***** dumb to understand that or just don't care?

So you just want me to believe what Trump said about the meeting. But, I'm not as gullible as you are, so I don't. They are liars and you know that

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

No, you disingenuous ****head, you're conflating both having "dirt" given to a campaign and a foreign government trying to interfere with an election. There was no reason to report the Trump Tower meeting to the FBI because the Russian contingent didn't attempt to do anything illegal. They had nothing on Clinton and only wanted to talk about the Magnitsky Act and the moratorium on adoptions. When Don Jr. realized this he left the meeting. This has been known for a year or two and has been explained to you many times. Are you just too ***** dumb to understand that or just don't care?

I think it's maybe - both...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you just want me to believe what Trump said about the meeting. But, I'm not as gullible as you are, so I don't. They are liars and you know that

 

 

yes, if they are in elected office, chances are they're liars.

every single one of them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you just want me to believe what Trump said about the meeting. But, I'm not as gullible as you are, so I don't. They are liars and you know that

 

 

 

We actually want you to just shut up.

 

There was a time we'd have settled for you being less of an arrogant jackass, and refusing to believe anything blindly.  But we've given up hope of you ever growing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Hey, I'm having a bad day, and I'm taking it out on his sorry ass.  ***** sue me.

Aren't there kittens or baby seals you can take your aggression out on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Nearly two years ago, FBI Director Chris Wray set up an office tasked solely with stopping the type of Russian interference efforts that infected the 2016 campaign.

On Wednesday night, President Donald Trump undercut the whole operation in a matter of seconds.

In an ABC News interview, the president first proclaimed he would have no problem accepting dirt on his opponents from a foreign power, then said Wray was “wrong” to suggest the FBI needs to know about such offers.

The comments, according to interviews with nearly a dozen law enforcement veterans, have undone months of work, essentially inviting foreign spies to meddle with 2020 presidential campaigns and demoralizing the agents trying to stop them. And it has backed Wray into a corner, they added, putting him in a position where he might have to either publicly chastise the president and risk getting fired, or resign in protest.

America’s enemies will see Trump’s comments and likely “come out of the woodwork like never before to try to influence the president,” said longtime FBI veteran Frank Figliuzzi, who served as the bureau’s assistant director for counterintelligence until 2012. “And it’s going to be more difficult to defend against because they’ll try harder than ever to mask their attempts.”

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/13/fbi-election-interference-fight-donald-trump-1364597

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

We actually want you to just shut up.

 

There was a time we'd have settled for you being less of an arrogant jackass, and refusing to believe anything blindly.  But we've given up hope of you ever growing up.

Federal Election Commission Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub released a statement Thursday making clear that candidates for public office may not receive help from a foreign government, in what appeared to be a warning to President Trump, who said he would consider taking information about an opponent from another country.

Tweeting her statement, Weintraub wrote, “I would not have thought that I needed to say this.”

The head of the agency responsible for campaign finance laws clarified that any campaign that accepts help from a foreign government “risks being on the wrong end of a federal investigation.”

“Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office,” Weintraub wrote. “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election. This is not a novel concept.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fec-chairwoman-warns-candidates-not-to-accept-help-from-foreign-governments/2019/06/13/fb8a7bfc-8e32-11e9-8f69-a2795fca3343_story.html?utm_term=.0bb9ca93eafb

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Nice try HAHA Gator. Trump responded in exactly the proper way. He said he'd listen to what someone had to say and determine if it was worthy of reporting it to the FBI. You asswipes on the Left are consumed with building new mountain ranges out of mole hills and nothing burgers. The frenzied hysterics that consumes the swamp people and their servant MSM with such all-consuming TDS would be totally laughable if you idiots didn't actually believe theshit that comes from your mouth.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Nice try HAHA Gator. Trump responded in exactly the proper way. He said he'd listen to what someone had to say and determine if it was worthy of reporting it to the FBI. You asswipes on the Left are consumed with building new mountain ranges out of mole hills and nothing burgers. The frenzied hysterics that consumes the swamp people and their servant MSM with such all-consuming TDS would be totally laughable if you idiots didn't actually believe theshit that comes from your mouth.

He is a criminal who thinks like a criminal. I suppose Trump University was an honest attempt by Trump to educate people, lol. You think that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Federal Election Commission Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub released a statement Thursday making clear that candidates for public office may not receive help from a foreign government, in what appeared to be a warning to President Trump, who said he would consider taking information about an opponent from another country.

Tweeting her statement, Weintraub wrote, “I would not have thought that I needed to say this.”

The head of the agency responsible for campaign finance laws clarified that any campaign that accepts help from a foreign government “risks being on the wrong end of a federal investigation.”

“Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office,” Weintraub wrote. “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election. This is not a novel concept.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fec-chairwoman-warns-candidates-not-to-accept-help-from-foreign-governments/2019/06/13/fb8a7bfc-8e32-11e9-8f69-a2795fca3343_story.html?utm_term=.0bb9ca93eafb

 

Define "of value". 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Define "of value". 

Fair question. All of it would depend on circumstances and what was traded. Stolen emails, or hacked info, would count. The way they did it with Russia was through a third party, "I love wikkileaks" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Fair question. All of it would depend on circumstances and what was traded. Stolen emails, or hacked info, would count. The way they did it with Russia was through a third party, "I love wikkileaks" 

 

"of value" in the legal sense in this law might mean something of monetary value or a promise of a political favor.  It might not mean "dirt" or information or evidence.  I don't know, we'd need a legal interpretation. 

 

And for the record Mueller and his crew looked very hard at the Wikileaks thing, no charges to Trump or his campaign people regarding the email dump.  That happened independent of Trump according to the investigation. 

 

According to Andy McCabe though, it's OK for campaigns for Americans running for office to hire American companies to hire foreign individuals and pay them to find "dirt" on political opponents. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

"of value" in the legal sense in this law might mean something of monetary value or a promise of a political favor.  It might not mean "dirt" or information or evidence.  I don't know, we'd need a legal interpretation. 

 

And for the record Mueller and his crew looked very hard at the Wikileaks thing, no charges to Trump or his campaign people regarding the email dump.  That happened independent of Trump according to the investigation. 

 

According to Andy McCabe though, it's OK for campaigns for Americans running for office to hire American companies to hire foreign individuals and pay them to find "dirt" on political opponents. 

 

They looked hard for a reason. That they could not establish a conspiracy--i.e. get enough proof to have an iron tight case--doesn't mean there wasn't a connection between Russia stealing info, handing it over to Assange and having Trump activly promoting it. All a coincidence I tell you 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Nanker said:

No collusion.

 

 

40 minutes ago, B-Man said:

No Obstruction

 

 

35 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

No End                                           to the Left's hysteria.

 

 

♥️

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Nanker said:

No collusion.

 

53 minutes ago, B-Man said:

No Obstruction

 

 

 

.

 

48 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

No End                                                                 to the Left's hysteria.

 

:lol:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Nice try HAHA Gator. Trump responded in exactly the proper way. He said he'd listen to what someone had to say and determine if it was worthy of reporting it to the FBI. You asswipes on the Left are consumed with building new mountain ranges out of mole hills and nothing burgers. The frenzied hysterics that consumes the swamp people and their servant MSM with such all-consuming TDS would be totally laughable if you idiots didn't actually believe theshit that comes from your mouth.

In addition, it is also 100% crystal clear and irrefutable that when a candidate does not receive anything of value from a foreign government, if the candidate is running on the Republican ticket he/she can absolutely expect that he/she will be investigated, that the freedom of his/her business associates and family members  are in peril, and that no stone will be left unturned in an attempt to ruin him/her and his/her associates and family members through doj/congressional/media mob overreach.

 

Why didn't the arrogant and condescending civil servant include that in her propaganda release? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

In addition, it is also 100% crystal clear and irrefutable that when a candidate does not receive anything of value from a foreign government, if the candidate is running on the Republican ticket he/she can absolutely expect that he/she will be investigated, that the freedom of his/her business associates and family members  are in peril, and that no stone will be left unturned in an attempt to ruin him/her and his/her associates and family members through doj/congressional/media mob overreach.

 

Why didn't the arrogant and condescending civil servant include that in her propaganda release? 

 

 

 

they can't get over Hillary losing

 

but at the same time NOW tell us she was a horrible candidate

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

In addition, it is also 100% crystal clear and irrefutable that when a candidate does not receive anything of value from a foreign government, if the candidate is running on the Democrat ticket he/she can absolutely expect that he/she will be applauded for their integrity. investigated, that the freedom of his/her business associates and family members  are in peril, and that no stone will be left unturned in an attempt to ruin him/her and his/her associates and family members through doj/congressional/media mob overreach.

 

Why didn't the arrogant and condescending civil servant include that in her propaganda release? 

 

 

FIFY

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Federal Election Commission Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub released a statement Thursday making clear that candidates for public office may not receive help from a foreign government, in what appeared to be a warning to President Trump, who said he would consider taking information about an opponent from another country.

Tweeting her statement, Weintraub wrote, “I would not have thought that I needed to say this.”

The head of the agency responsible for campaign finance laws clarified that any campaign that accepts help from a foreign government “risks being on the wrong end of a federal investigation.”

“Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office,” Weintraub wrote. “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election. This is not a novel concept.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fec-chairwoman-warns-candidates-not-to-accept-help-from-foreign-governments/2019/06/13/fb8a7bfc-8e32-11e9-8f69-a2795fca3343_story.html?utm_term=.0bb9ca93eafb

 

for you and the assmuncher, @McGee Return TD

 

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1139600387990704128

 

as well as the complaint against the Clinton Campaign that has been sitting on her desk for 20 months now.

yeah, no bias to be found anywhere here...

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nanker said:

No collusion.

 

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

No Obstruction

 

3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

No End                                                               

Tibs-No brain

Edited by Wacka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

 

for you and the assmuncher, @McGee Return TD

 

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1139600387990704128

 

as well as the complaint against the Clinton Campaign that has been sitting on her desk for 20 months now.

yeah, no bias to be found anywhere here...

 

Weintraub is also formerly a partner at Perkins Coie -- the cut out between the DNC, Clinton Campaign and fusion GPS who paid millions for ... Wait for it... Foreign intelligence to interfere with the election. 

 

How much longer will she be head of the FEC? Tick tock. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...