Jump to content

The Mueller Report. BREAKING NEWS: AG’s Summary Report Released. NO COLLUSION!


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Can't wait to see Trump in cuffs at 9:35!  

 

been going apeshit every day praying and doing a rain dance for Trump to have to take a perp walk of shame since January 2016....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last chance to spin before anyone reads whatever they release? Will the press get to read any of whatever is released before the presser? 

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

Matt Furie drew the alt-right’s favorite cartoon frog. Now he is leading one of the most successful legal campaigns against the racist right.

More than a decade has passed since Furie first drew a stoned-looking frog named “Pepe” and uploaded it to Myspace. The frog rose from MySpace in-joke to popular meme, before being taken up as an unofficial mascot of internet neo-Nazis during the 2016 presidential primaries. Since then, Furie has been leading a campaign to reclaim his creation, filing copyright infringement complaints against white nationalist Richard Spencer, conspiracy news site InfoWars,

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-creator-of-pepe-is-winning-his-war-on-the-alt-right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


And President Trump reportedly is readying an order to declassify five key buckets of documents on alleged FBI abuses.

After Horowitz (and Huber) or before? 

 

5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's a coin flip for me - I don't know the sequence... if it were me, I'd let Horowitz lead then follow with the declass. But that's me.

Beanz took a lot of heat for this post.

 

 

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1118493169728086019

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

This is called a canary trap. 

 

 

 

 

They're going to dare the dems to leak it. And then charge them when they do (and they will)

 

...and maybe some of the redacted sections they are permitted to view aren't complimentary to the dem side. 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

...and maybe some of the redacted sections they are permitted to view aren't complimentary to the dem side. 


I'd laugh my head off if that were true. 

The post says they are in relation to Roger Stone. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

...and maybe some of the redacted sections they are permitted to view aren't complimentary to the dem side. 

 

Would be hilarious.  But probably not wise to tell their enemies any more details about what they have on them prior to releasing the wave of indictments against the perpetrators/backers of the spying operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

I don’t care that there’s a press conference. Don’t care that POTUS has seen it. Don’t care that it’s redacted. It will be a relief a week from now after we’ve all had time to digest it and start moving on. 


Ummmm That ain't happenin'. 

There are more reports coming out - the Horowitz report is scheduled for May or June. I believe there are three more reports coming out in total (someone please correct me if I am wrong). 

There will (most likely) be indictments and prosecutions and the trials that accompany them. 

People will not be moving on from this anytime soon. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies. “Moving on” from the Trump collusion and obstruction narratives. Even though the obstruction case is stronger and likely ugly, it’s history. Barr isn’t bringing it. 

 

There will I’ll be no moving on from Russia’s interference. And maybe there will be interesting investigations into the investigators. Both of those are ongoing issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To give you a clue at how clueless the general public is....  I would have worded it "prove collusion" but 39% of people are either in denial or so brainwashed they can't objectively look at the evidence provided to them.

 

muellerpoll3.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

To give you a clue at how clueless the general public is....  I would have worded it "prove collusion" but 39% of people are either in denial or so brainwashed they can't objectively look at the evidence provided to them.

 

muellerpoll3.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

 

Was there a followup question of are you

Republican

Democrat

Independent

 

Which I suspect would have been somewhere in the 35-39-25% ranges

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

Was there a followup question of are you

Republican

Democrat

Independent

 

Which I suspect would have been somewhere in the 35-39-25% ranges

No follow up question but they did give the demographics to the question and the answer was largely shaped by party....Independents breaking towards Mueller report did not prove no collusion.

 

Dems - 14% yes, 61% no, 26% don't know

Independents - 21% yes, 36% no, 43% don't know

Republicans - 63% yes 19% no, 19% don't know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

No follow up question but they did give the demographics to the question and the answer was largely shaped by party....Independents breaking towards Mueller report did not prove no collusion.

 

Dems - 14% yes, 61% no, 26% don't know

Independents - 21% yes, 36% no, 43% don't know

Republicans - 63% yes 19% no, 19% don't know. 

 

and another poll you cherry pick to back up an opinion that really isn't controversial and nobody will hold you heavily to account for???

 

:(

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The report will be fun to read. Trump has been saying for weeks that it’s a complete exoneration and was a witch hunt (implying all connections and potential crimes by him/his campaign are fake).

 

I am curious to see if his inoculation efforts were well founded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about the IRA now... remember, this was known BEFORE Mueller. IRA was outted by the NYT in 2012/2013.

"No evidence that Trump or anyone connected to the campaign coordinated with the IRA"

 

The Special Counsel "found NO COLLUSION on any activities relating to IRA"

GRU hacking now... this is the trickiest wicket 

"No one associated with the campaign coordinated or worked with the Russian government to hack."

That's the entire Steele dossier being burned to the ground with that last point.

"Publication of the documents is not criminal... no one associated with Trump participated in disseminating the stolen info."

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line: 

 

"After nearly two years of investigations, thousands of subpoenas, the SCO confirmed Russia sponsored efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, but did not find evidence that ANY American colluded in those efforts"

 

That's lights out, folks.

Now onto Obstruction... 

 

RR and Barr concluded TOGETHER that there was not enough evidence to support an obstruction case.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...