joemac1114 Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 23 minutes ago, Ray Finkel said: Maybe we should trade up in the draft next year to get a receiver and then Peterman will be great again! It's going to be hard trading up from the number one spot. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Skins Malone said: Well it's not the Bill's fault EJ doesnt have a job. EJ isnt a good QB and neither is NP. Enough said. Not to pick on you, but this is the same type of ignorant comment that fills all such threads on this board: the inability to see the distinction between "not good" and "horrid" or "among the worst in NFL history." Remember EJ's abysmal start in London against the then-sorry Jags? The one that may have ruined any hope for breaking the playoff drought in 2016? Who could forget the awfulness? But wait ... here's what used to count as "awful" around here -- EJ's stats in that game: 24-42, 298, 2 TD, 2 INT (including one pick 6), 75.3 QB rating. Nathan Peterman's best performance was today's -- 31-49, 189, 0 TD, 3 INT (including, of course, a pick 6), 45.4 QB rating. The first performance is your every-week bad QB performance in the NFL. The second performance would be one of the worst in the NFL in any given year, but for the fact that such a performance is now a weekly occurrence in Billsland. EDIT: EJ is right. It is ridiculous that guys like Derek Anderson and Matt Barkley are being signed ahead of him, and even more ridiculous that Nathan Peterman still has a spot on an NFL roster while he sits at home. Edited November 5, 2018 by The Frankish Reich 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 It would be pretty awkward to resign a failed 1st round QB that you put your franchise hopes on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 29 minutes ago, Heitz said: Maybe EJ didn’t throw picks, but he didn’t really throw to our WR’s either... There's that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins Malone Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Not to pick on you, but this is the same type of ignorant comment that fills all such threads on this board: the inability to see the distinction between "not good" and "horrid" or "among the worst in NFL history." Remember EJ's abysmal start in London against the then-sorry Jags? The one that may have ruined any hope for breaking the playoff drought in 2016? Who could forget the awfulness? But wait ... here's what used to count as "awful" around here -- EJ's stats in that game: 24-42, 298, 2 TD, 2 INT (including one pick 6), 75.3 QB rating. Nathan Peterman's best performance was today's -- 31-49, 189, 0 TD, 3 INT (including, of course, a pick 6), 45.4 QB rating. The first performance is your every-week bad QB performance in the NFL. The second performance would be one of the worst in the NFL in any given year, but for the fact that such a performance is now a weekly occurrence in Billsland. Who are you calling ignorant dude. Do you know me? Sorry if I dont care what EJ thinks. Is this where were at wanting EJ Manuel back. Yes EJ is not horrid like NP but they are both not starting QBs in the NFL. So who cares. EJ is no longer a Bill end of story. The Bill's now are JA who is hurt. I dont control who plays QB for the Bill's. Does EJ have a point yes...he would be a better back up for this team no doubt about it. And of course I see the difference..the point is it doesnt matter. EJ is not a Bill and NP is. That's the situation. I dont control it. But dont be throwing around the word ignorant when u dont know me. We need a starting QB not NP or EJ. Edited November 5, 2018 by Skins Malone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 40 minutes ago, billsfan714 said: There is zero doubt he is better than Nate or Barkley. He might be better than Allen.... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 38 minutes ago, buffalobillswin said: Troy - "Robert Woods is a great WR unfortunately I didn't get a chance to watch him a lot in Buffalo" Joe - "No one did" Then he murmured something and Troy let out a little chuckle Well, he's not wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 1 minute ago, Skins Malone said: Who are you calling ignorant dude. Do you know me? Sorry if I dont care what EJ thinks. Is this where were at wanting EJ Manuel back. Yes EJ is not horrid like NP but they are both not starting QBs in the NFL. So who cares. EJ is no longer a Bill end of story. The Bill's now are JA who is hurt. I dont control who plays QB for the Bill's. Does EJ have a point yes...he would be a better back up for this team no doubt about it. But of course I see the difference..the point is it doesnt matter. EJ is not a Bill and NP is. That's the situation. I dont control it. But dont be throwing around the word ignorant when u dont know me. Perhaps you're ignorant of the meanings of the word "ignorant" - as used here, I meant: lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 16 minutes ago, noacls said: Lol. I prefer to think of him as Jed Clampett Call me when you make your first Billion... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maine-iac Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Not to pick on you, but this is the same type of ignorant comment that fills all such threads on this board: the inability to see the distinction between "not good" and "horrid" or "among the worst in NFL history." Remember EJ's abysmal start in London against the then-sorry Jags? The one that may have ruined any hope for breaking the playoff drought in 2016? Who could forget the awfulness? But wait ... here's what used to count as "awful" around here -- EJ's stats in that game: 24-42, 298, 2 TD, 2 INT (including one pick 6), 75.3 QB rating. Nathan Peterman's best performance was today's -- 31-49, 189, 0 TD, 3 INT (including, of course, a pick 6), 45.4 QB rating. The first performance is your every-week bad QB performance in the NFL. The second performance would be one of the worst in the NFL in any given year, but for the fact that such a performance is now a weekly occurrence in Billsland. EDIT: EJ is right. It is ridiculous that guys like Derek Anderson and Matt Barkley are being signed ahead of him, and even more ridiculous that Nathan Peterman still has a spot on an NFL roster while he sits at home. Exactly. I was thinking the same thing ........ boy that Jags game was awful. Then I went back and looked at it and despite that awful 2nd qtr he actually fought back. My biggest problem with EJ was that he couldn't hit anything down field to save his life. That is what made Tyrod such a refreshing change (no one here seems to remember how bad it was). Taylor came in and hit the deep ball almost every game when we had Watkins and Goodwin. Then Dennison comes along, Taylor is gone, now Daboll comes in and now we might not see 5 passing TD's all season. Someone said he might be better than Allen. I like Allen don't get me wrong, and I think he has it, but if he can't hit receivers deep better than EJ did then maybe he isn't any better than EJ. Hopefully time will prove that he is better. Edited November 5, 2018 by Maine-iac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins Malone Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Perhaps you're ignorant of the meanings of the word "ignorant" - as used here, I meant: lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified. And clearly you didnt read my post. What's lacking...that EJ isnt as bad as NP? No kidding. The point is EJ isnt on this team and hes not a starting QB. Either is NP. So what am I ignorant about? Am I suppose to yearn for the days of EJ Manuel lol. Edited November 5, 2018 by Skins Malone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noacls Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, Heitz said: Call me when you make your first Billion... So is this Kim or Terry? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niagara Dude Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 56 minutes ago, aristocrat said: He’s right Not that i am some EJ lover but he is right, Bills needs to cut this guy. He is just no freaking good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsfaninChicago Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 I always like EJ and I still do. I just don’t think he ever became anywhere near a starting quarterback in the league (I was at the game in London). Having said that I don’t think Peterman even passes as a back up quarterback in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 You can't do anything but laugh. If we were a bigger market this would be all over ESPN. I wonder if the big dog advised him to take it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 hey i can throw better than peterman--but im not bitching about being unemployed by the nfl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 Like others have said, he’s right. I don’t blame him, I would be pissed too if I was a better QB than Peterman and watching him play while I didn’t have a job. Hell im kind of peaved Peterman is playing for Bills and I haven’t been signed yet cuz I’m a better QB than him too. Call me Beane 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 23 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Not to pick on you, but this is the same type of ignorant comment that fills all such threads on this board: the inability to see the distinction between "not good" and "horrid" or "among the worst in NFL history." Remember EJ's abysmal start in London against the then-sorry Jags? The one that may have ruined any hope for breaking the playoff drought in 2016? Who could forget the awfulness? But wait ... here's what used to count as "awful" around here -- EJ's stats in that game: 24-42, 298, 2 TD, 2 INT (including one pick 6), 75.3 QB rating. Nathan Peterman's best performance was today's -- 31-49, 189, 0 TD, 3 INT (including, of course, a pick 6), 45.4 QB rating. The first performance is your every-week bad QB performance in the NFL. The second performance would be one of the worst in the NFL in any given year, but for the fact that such a performance is now a weekly occurrence in Billsland. EDIT: EJ is right. It is ridiculous that guys like Derek Anderson and Matt Barkley are being signed ahead of him, and even more ridiculous that Nathan Peterman still has a spot on an NFL roster while he sits at home. i love EJ----but only a team like the bills or browns or raiders would be stupid enough to sign him. of course he is better than peterman....but so what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulbills Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 EJ is a bum, who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo44 Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 Pathetic! If this is the basis of comparison you have to use to claim your’re worthy of a job in the NFL then you have no insight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts