Jump to content

Michael Lombardi: Start Josh Allen; 'Ridiculous' to play Nate Peterman because offensive line stinks


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, brianthomas said:

I get your logic & i might even agree with it. But thats like saying you bought a ferrari & leave it in the garage because youre afraid it might get damaged... well why did you buy a ferrari then? You made the investment to go out & get it, it serves you no use to just let it sit in the garage. Youre never gonna learn how to drive unless you get behind the wheel imo.

Generalized statements on how to handle a rookie qb aside. I think what direction you go in with regards to Josh depends on what you see out of him with the reps he gets. If he looks like he can handle the pressure & remain poised & in control of himself, then throw him out there.

I think if Josh feels like the coaches are afraid to put him out there because he might start doubting himself, that in turn could help make him doubt himself too. It goes both ways imo.

 

You don't leave it in the garage forever... You just wait for the summer.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean if the Bills feel that Allen will develop during the season go ahead and start him. Allen has showed signs of life during preseason. Let the Bengals game be his learning experience.

 

To be clear I'm leaning twords Peterman but I also don't deny that the quick passing style might just be a gimmick. He needs to be perfect to make it work. The margin for error is slim. 

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Probably more like it hasn't been announced, but they likely already have made a decision.

 

1 hour ago, Figster said:

Myself personally transplant,  and pure speculation mind you on my part.

 

I think McD had already made his mind up about how he wanted Allens development to go and it doesn't include opening up the season against the Ravens. 

 

Preseason game 3 was a good example why...

 

I guess I should rephrase...

 

fascinating it hasn't been announced, yet.

 

Not necessarily surprising, though.

 

I agree that McDermott's already made the decision.

 

But Figster, while I understand the perspective that his decision has been made and it's Peterman, I'm not so sure.  And I don't think anyone who starts or plays or doesn't start or play in tomorrow's game will give us an answer, either.

 

You say McDermott hasn't made the announcement because he wants to take the Ravens by surprise and it will be Peterman taking them by surprise.

 

I think it could be that he didn't make the announcement because the best way to get a rookie QB off to a good start is by giving the opponent a guessing game and that's exactly what he's got going right now.

 

People say Peterman performed the best in the preseason and has the production to show for it, so he's pretty obviously going to be the guy.

 

I think it could be that Allen's performance in that last game, while ugly, demonstrated a certain level of poise and composure in the pocket in the face of extreme pressure that shows he can handle it.

 

 

The real question McDermott, Dabol, and probably to a slightly lesser extent Beane will be answering is whether Allen's beyod the "too raw to start" stage.  Beane has made comments all offseason that the "too raw" narrative by the media was misguided, if not completely false. 

 

People who think the approach will be "our OL is awful, we don't want our investment destroyed so let's start another expendable QB" might have the right idea on what the approach should be, but I believe it's pretty naïve to think NFL coaches approach who starts at QB based on that.

 

As for who starts tomorrow and the inevitable bickering that comes about what it means, nothing about this offseason has been traditional.  I can see McDermott bucking the trend and playing whoever he starts week 1 a lot just in order to get as many reps in for that guy since there's been such a true 3 way rotation of the QBs since OTAs.

 

Anyway, we won't find out until kickoff in Baltimore.  I'm happy with that.  McDermott should keep the Ravens and Harbaugh on their toes anyway.  Maintain any advantage he can.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

Shut up Michael , remember Derrick Carr and many others shell shocked into oblivion because teams started them with bad lines ??? We are not doing that with Allen !!!

 

 

 

*David

But yes, let's avoid that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ramza86 said:

Josh would hit the ground 20 times a game. 

 

More times you get sacked/knocked down. More chances you get hurt. 

 

Thats why Mr. Lombardi.

 

He is absolutely correct. You don’t start him because he’s not ready, not because the line blows. 

 

I keep saying this, but Peterman hasn’t been tested in the face of pressure this preseason. 

 

We have no idea if he is any different than last years guy. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

He is absolutely correct. You don’t start him because he’s not ready, not because the line blows. 

 

I keep saying this, but Peterman hasn’t been tested in the face of pressure this preseason. 

 

We have no idea if he is any different than last years guy. 

But you can't look at QB in a vacuum. You cant just ask "is he ready to start" you have to consider the team around him I think Allen would be ready to start if he were surrounded by a superbowl quality team (Like Big Ben in 2004.) But I don't think hes ready to start for a rebuilding team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Batman1876 said:

But you can't look at QB in a vacuum. You cant just ask "is he ready to start" you have to consider the team around him I think Allen would be ready to start if he were surrounded by a superbowl quality team (Like Big Ben in 2004.) But I don't think hes ready to start for a rebuilding team. 

Exactly. Ready to start isn’t close to a finished product. If the line were better, it would be a different decision as Peterman isn’t a seasoned vet and McCarron hasn’t impressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cd1 said:

 

Allen does just fine (for the most part). He just got rattled last week.  He will learn.

 

One of Nate's biggest assets is his ability to quickly read a defense and make adjustments. Nate's weak arm is his downfall. I think Nate will make for an excellent backup QB and a very good mentor in teaching Josh to "speed read" the defense. 

 

Personally, I think it would be great to let Josh play the whole game tomorrow night. The kid has got everything it will take to be our franchise guy. He just needs enough experience playing at the NFL level. To be able to play in a game where they are not sending out the wolves, he will get experience in more things than picking grass out of his teeth.

 

Make no mistake, Josh is our guy. He just needs some time to get up to speed.

 

IMHO

 

 

Peterman doesn't speed read the defense. He reads pre-snap then pre-determines his throws. Great when everyone is in vanilla cover 2 pre season base defense. A recipe for disaster when teams are disguising coverages in the regular season. I think it looks more like Nate will start week 1. I still say week 4 is the latest Josh takes over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Peterman doesn't speed read the defense. He reads pre-snap then pre-determines his throws. Great when everyone is in vanilla cover 2 pre season base defense. A recipe for disaster when teams are disguising coverages in the regular season. I think it looks more like Nate will start week 1. I still say week 4 is the latest Josh takes over. 

 

That's preferrable to needing 3+ seconds to analyze and read the field, especially when you're going to get 2 at best on most snaps.

Edited by BigDingus
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's exactly right, I can't believe that this franchise is going to screw this up yet another year, they're going to end up ripping fans and maybe even the team apart for absolutely no reason at all, other than Sean McDermott being stubborn on Nathan Peterman, I truly hope that if that's the direction he decides to go he ends up looking like a fool over the same decision two years in a row.

3 hours ago, bmur66 said:

Sacrifice the least valuable first

This is assinine and I doubt any professional coach thinks like this, they aren't gonna use Peterman as a sacrificial lamb.

2 hours ago, Sweats said:

We’ve got a long rich history of ruining QB’s.......in fact, you could stack their failures like cord wood, however, if the FO is serious about our rookie being our franchise QB of the future, then fix the friggin o-line.

Yes we do, however our only single problem is that we (fans and coaches) turn on our young QBs at the first sign of trouble, just as our fans are doing now. Meanwhile most other teams simply ride out the highs and low for a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...