Jump to content

Which Bills Decision Infuriated You?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 1st&ten said:

I'm old so there's tons of them---

 

Trading Daryl Lamonica to the Raiders

Not building the stadium in Lancaster

Cutting Fred Jackson

Hiring Rex Ryan

 

I could list about 50 more.

 

 

 

Why Lancaster?

 

 

Edited by Buffalo Barbarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, THE SLAMMER said:

Right now its the entire Richie Incognito situation

 

This can be worked out. placing all the blame on Richie is a big mistake.

 

Like I always say, if the situation makes no sense there is always more to the story.

 

The Bills are not completely blameless

 

I couldn't disagree more. You agree to a contract by signing, reading, and understanding it. The Bills are running a business not a charity. He didn't go over the details and he got burned. 

 

He could have easily pursued other opportunities if he didn't like the number. He lied about injuries, had a Twitter meltdown, then admitted it was about the money. I'm not sure if you noticed, but he's been completely silent all social media since his fiasco. Someone seems to have gotten through to him to stop talking for once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Epstein's Mother said:

 

Not sure I understand this one.  Maybe you meant starting Johnson over Flutie in general but in this instance when Rob Johnson walked off the field for the last time that day he was ahead.

 

if RJ hadn't fumbled the football out of the back of the EZ for a safety, that forward lateral "TD," would still not given them enough points to win. After the resulting free kick giving them excellent field position and motivation, they scored their only TD  of the game. Flutie starts that game we win going away.

 

The other one I didn't like was dumping Fred when we did.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Utah John said:

Here's another:  Letting Jim Kelly take a call from the USFL in the Bills office, when he was ready to sign as a rookie.  He ended up spending a couple of years in the USFL instead of with the Bills.

 

I mean, hard to blame the Bills for that. The man left on his own accord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elite Poster said:

 

I couldn't disagree more. You agree to a contract by signing, reading, and understanding it. The Bills are running a business not a charity. He didn't go over the details and he got burned. 

 

He could have easily pursued other opportunities if he didn't like the number. He lied about injuries, had a Twitter meltdown, then admitted it was about the money. I'm not sure if you noticed, but he's been completely silent all social media since his fiasco. Someone seems to have gotten through to him to stop talking for once. 

 

A good business doesn't take a 3 year in a row pro bowler and ask for a pay cut now do they?.  How do you know he lied about his injuries?

You do realize that agents have the power to ok a deal without having the player present, right? The players don't hop a jet for buffalo, this is why you hire an agent...most likely the reason for firing

Completed deals are electronically sent for approval sometimes without the player completely understanding the terms....it happens

Geeez, glad I don't work for you....90 % of this is hear say your honor....lol

Edited by THE SLAMMER
change wording
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Those are my Top 2.

I started following football about 1971 or so. Lamonica's Raiders were always good and exciting to watch. I remember being astounded when my dad told me that he used to be on the Bills. I couldn't figure out how that could have possibly happened. You know what? I still can't.

According to rumors at the time there were ' Mitigating " circumstances in the trade of Lamonica

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elite Poster said:

 

I mean, hard to blame the Bills for that. The man left on his own accord.

Spending those two years in the USFL was the best thing that could have happened for Kelly’s development. He came to us knowing how to read defenses and I doubt he would have learned as much under Kay Stephenson and Co. vs. what he learned with Mouse Davis.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, THE SLAMMER said:

 

A good business doesn't take a 3 year in a row pro bowler and ask for a pay cut now do they?.  How do you know he lied about his injuries?

You do realize that agents have the power to ok a deal without having the player present, right? The players don't hop a jet for buffalo, this is why you hire an agent...most likely the reason for firing

Completed deals are electronically sent for approval sometimes without the player completely understanding the terms....it happens

Geeez, glad I don't work for you....90 % of this is hear say your honor....lol

 

I hear all the time players say football is a Man's game, for "Grown-Ass Men"

 

 If a "Grown-Ass Man" reads and signs something he doesn't understand, what difference does it make if transmitted electronically, by Fed-Ex Next Day, or by carrier pigeon?   It's still on an adult not to sign something he doesn't understand.  Call your agent.  Call your lawyer.  Call your massage therapist who's moonlighting while working her way through law school.  

 

I made that last up, but the rest is "Grown-up 101": don't read and sign something you don't understand.  If you need help to understand a contract, get help.  For some folks that's problematic as they don't have the money, but Richie doesn't have that limitation.  Maybe drop a word out of the "Grown-ass man" phrase. 

 

And yes, an agent can agree to a deal, but they can't sign it for the player (unless player gave them a Power of Attorney I guess- see above about Grown-up 101)

 

I don't know whether or not Richie lied about his medical exam: needing to retire because kidneys and liver shutting down.  If I'm in the business of staffing a football team, neither option raises his value to the GM.  Either he lied about it, in which case he's not honest, or he didn't lie about it, in which case I'm uninspired to pay more bucks for a sick puppy.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

60's Making OJ a decoy his first two years.  Thanks, John Rauch.

70's - early 80's Not retaining Chuck Knox

Early 80's version of Rex Ryan was Hank Bullough 

1987-1995 - Letting Polian Go...Ralph, Littman and Linda couldn't take the honesty

Letting John Butler and then Wade Phillips go 

2000's becoming an NFL farm team with the talent we did obtain - Winfield, Williams, Clements, Poz and then drafting horribly and signing crap like Langston Walker, Chris Williams (who was damaged when we signed him).

Focusing on marketing with moves like TO instead of the on the field product

 

I agree with the posts about not shoring up the Bills weakest area ever.    The Bills really needed to try not to make the playoffs for 17 years...

 

 

Edited by JoeF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The obvious answer for me is choosing RJ over Flutie.

 

I firmly believe we beat the Titans with Flutie under center. RJ was terrible, going 10-22 with 131 yards passing and 1 crucial turnover. 

Edited by Hsker4life
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the first thought that popped into my head and it was an in game decision.  It was a 2002 home game against the Pats when we started 5-3.  We were down 10 points in the 3rd and had a 4th and 2 on the New England 32.  We punt in a game that was supposed to be a shootout.  New England ends up blowing us out.  It's probably not close to the most infuriating decision, but I find it the perfect microcosm of the Bills during the drought.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, THE SLAMMER said:

Right now its the entire Richie Incognito situation

 

This can be worked out. placing all the blame on Richie is a big mistake.

 

Like I always say, if the situation makes no sense there is always more to the story.

 

The Bills are not completely blameless

Is this Ritchie's stealth account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Marv letting Kelly keep throwing the ball in the best chance to win a SB in franchise history

2. Not paying Jason Peters

3. Hiring Marv as GM

4. Hiring Dave Wannstedt as DC

5. Allowing Rex to dismantle the Jim Schwartz defense.  I had no issue with Rex as a HC hire.  I thought wrongly that he would retain Schwartz and just add a few blitz/coverage wrinkles to what Schwartz was doing.  If Rex had simply played the role of HC, both he and Whaley would be here now with multiple playoff seasons.  

 

9 hours ago, BurpleBull said:

 

I honestly was still in shock that they would trade Alonso after he showed so much promise as a rookie even with McCoy being the player they swapped for.

Then you only watched the first 8 games he played and not the second 8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...