Jump to content

Hear me out, sign Le'veon bell


Batman1876

Recommended Posts

So obviously this is an unlikely, outside the box idea but here it is.

If We had Bell and Shady we would have two of the best backs in the league.  Bell averaged 21 carries per game and Shady had 17. The bills last year averaged 63 plays per game. So if we aimed for 40 carries and 25 passes both backs could get their touches.  Assuming we get a Rookie QB we could sign Bell rather than signing  an expensive veteran QB for our rook to learn behind.  Instead of taking the pressure off of our rookie by having him on the bench take the pressure off with 2 all pro backs. Get the rookie live fire experience but in a situation where he is not asked to do too much.  On top of that I imagine our new OC with his  NE and Alabama pedigree could figure out ways to put pressure on the defense by creatively using both of them. At the end of the year cut ties with Shady keep Bell and transition to a more balanced offense with a QB who has had a year to develop.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Batman1876 said:

Because he does not want to be there and has threatened not to play if they tag him. 

 

Why should he?  All it does is give him a massive amount of risk, and minimizes his reward.  The issue always comes back to guaranteed money, and he wants more than what he's getting on 2 running back tags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

So obviously this is an unlikely, outside the box idea but here it is.

If We had Bell and Shady we would have two of the best backs in the league.  Bell averaged 21 carries per game and Shady had 17. The bills last year averaged 63 plays per game. So if we aimed for 40 carries and 25 passes both backs could get their touches.  Assuming we get a Rookie QB we could sign Bell rather than signing  an expensive veteran QB for our rook to learn behind.  Instead of taking the pressure off of our rookie by having him on the bench take the pressure off with 2 all pro backs. Get the rookie live fire experience but in a situation where he is not asked to do too much.  On top of that I imagine our new OC with his  NE and Alabama pedigree could figure out ways to put pressure on the defense by creatively using both of them. At the end of the year cut ties with Shady keep Bell and transition to a more balanced offense with a QB who has had a year to develop.  

 

 

Get out of a 1970s football mindset 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, he's a guy that commands franchise tag money already and isn't happy with it, so imagine how much we'd have to spend to lock him up long term. 

Second, neither back wants to not start. Even if they were to get even carries, only one would be considered the starter.

 

Third, unless we are planning to draft and or sign in free agency some amazing O-line talent, it wouldn't be worth the investment. And locking up multiple backs with big money could be awful (see Philadelphia a few years ago...and they had a GREAT line).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be franchised and then out of the league by 2020.  I say no.  400 plus touches a year is insane and no player has ever been able to maintain the usage as an NFL back.  i would argue that Shady has just as much tread on his tires that Bell has.  i would stick with Shady and get a young back in the draft on the cheap.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

I think we go for Brady and Rodgers. Have them battle it out in camp w tyrod. 

 

Hear me out...

Brady is old, Rodgers is now injury prone, and Tyrod is in his prime. Do you really think it's fair to have them compete with him at this point in their careers? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...