Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Be kind! I heard they were on suicide watch. Watch? Hell, I'd buy a ticket... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: On what basis? Be specific. On the basis that they got away with it once...Criminals only get emboldened 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Watch? Hell, I'd buy a ticket... You probably would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: On the basis that they got away with it once...Criminals only get emboldened No worries, Obama and his minions will get their's for starting this witch hunt with no evidence 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, bilzfancy said: No worries, Obama and his minions will get their's for starting this witch hunt with no evidence No evidence?? WOW! I understand you are blindly partisan but gees, our country's election was attacked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: No evidence?? WOW! I understand you are blindly partisan but gees, our country's election was attacked Zero evidence one vote was changed by Russia, not one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You probably would I just said I would. Great deductive skills. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: On the basis that they got away with it once...Criminals only get emboldened You probably would Russia/Putin tried to affect our 2016 elections on OBAMA'S watch. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, bilzfancy said: Zero evidence one vote was changed by Russia, not one You don't need proof like that to start and investigation. All you need to know is that they were trying, trying really hard. Doing illegal things in fact. How many indictments did Mueller hand down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: You don't need proof like that to start and investigation. All you need to know is that they were trying, trying really hard. Doing illegal things in fact. How many indictments did Mueller hand down? Zero had to do with the 2016 election. Zero. (American indictments) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Russia/Putin tried to affect our 2016 elections on OBAMA'S watch. Yes, with the willingness of the Republican candidate to accept the help. That is so totally wrong. It is un-American Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, bilzfancy said: Zero evidence one vote was changed by Russia, not one Hey now, that $10,000 in Facebook ads could have changed one vote. Probably not two votes, but one was possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Zero had to do with the 2016 election. Zero. (American indictments) Please just try and tell the truth here. Trump lies enough already, you telling whoppers on here is really just sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Please just try and tell the truth here. Trump lies enough already, you telling whoppers on here is really just sad. That is the truth, Tibs. Not a single American was indicted for anything having to do with collusion/conspiracy or the 2016 election. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That is the truth, Tibs. Not a single American was indicted for anything having to do with collusion/conspiracy or the 2016 election. @Tiberius If you disagree with the above, you're welcome to post the indictments for collusion/conspiracy in 2016. The indictments are public record. But you won't, because you're 1) an idiot, and 2) a chickenshit. But you're welcome to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That is the truth, Tibs. Not a single American was indicted for anything having to do with collusion/conspiracy or the 2016 election. American, ok. There were indictments to do with the hacking of the election and we do know that Mueller connected Trump's comments directly to attempts to hack Democratic computers. That's a fact. 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: @Tiberius If you disagree with the above, you're welcome to post the indictments for collusion/conspiracy in 2016. The indictments are public record. But you won't, because you're 1) an idiot, and 2) a chickenshit. But you're welcome to. Lol, yes, make your stand on that hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: American, ok. There were indictments to do with the hacking of the election and we do know that Mueller connected Trump's comments directly to attempts to hack Democratic computers. That's a fact. Please define "hacking of the election". Edited April 18, 2019 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yes, with the willingness of the Republican candidate to accept the help. That is so totally wrong. It is un-American No... what is un-american us using unverified dirty report funded by political opposition to get a FISA warrant to spy on a political campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Now that this charade is over, let Barr find who did the spying on Trump, and if it went all the way up to Obama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, bdutton said: No... what is un-american us using unverified dirty report funded by political opposition to get a FISA warrant to spy on a political campaign. That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I thought the setup was brilliant on Barr's part. Explain what happened factually, leave a bit of wriggle room for a partisan journo to imply Barr was working on behalf of the president, and journo implying Barr was dirty....then telling her the narrative actually came from Mueller report. Masterfully done. Edited April 18, 2019 by leh-nerd skin-erd 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? Thanks but no thanks. I wouldn't want to depend on you for anything but your lies. That's the one thing you are really good at, delivering lies. You're like a five-star lie delivery company. You are one of a kind. Liar of liars. Chief of falsehoods and deceiver of others. You've found your niche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 And the left has turned on RR Jesus, they can't keep their narrative straight. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And the left has turned on RR Jesus, they can't keep their narrative straight. They really are flinging poo just to see what sticks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And the left has turned on RR Jesus, they can't keep their narrative straight. How dare he not recuse himself! He should have been fired for that... (How dare Trump fire him! Obstruction!) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 As expected: (It's not true) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote In an executive summary, Mueller’s team clearly stated that it did not believe “collusion”—which Trump has incessantly insisted he did not commit—to be a legal term. For that reason, prosecutors did not assess whether Trump’s campaign “colluded” with Russia. “In evaluation whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion,’” prosecutors wrote. They noted that the Department of Justice had at times used the word “collusion” prior to Mueller’s appointment. “But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law.” They said they instead examined whether anyone associated with the Trump campaign “coordinated” with Russians, as defined by conspiracy law. “We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.” They noted that an agreement requires two parties taking actions “informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests.” Using that definition, they wrote, the investigation “did not establish” that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference. (From page 2 of the report) — Rosalind S. Helderman https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-report-russia-investigation-findings/2019/04/18/b07f4310-56f9-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.92689d6f5159 Are you f'n kidding me! In a heavily redacted section of the special counsel’s report, Mueller writes that, “The Trump Campaign showed interest in Wikileaks’ releases of hacked materials throughout the summer and fall of 2016.” The subsequent pages mention several key Trump associates, including Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen and Rick Gates. But most the details are redacted under the heading of “Harm to Ongoing Matter. According to former Trump campaign adviser Gates, then campaign manager Manafort “expressed excitement about the release” of stolen DNC emails by WikiLeaks in the summer of 2016. Manafort told the special counsel that, shortly after the July 22 release, Manafort also spoke with Trump. Manafort wanted to be kept apprised of developments,and separately told Gates to keep in touch about future WikiLeaks releases. The pages also mention the activities of WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, but again this section features heavy redactions. Another line in this section says, “Candidate Trump told Gates that more releases of damaging information would be coming.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mueller-report-russia-investigation-findings/2019/04/18/b07f4310-56f9-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.92689d6f5159 right. not only was there no collusion, there was no conspiracy to collude. thanks for posting that, tibs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Another line in this section says, “Candidate Trump told Gates that more releases of damaging information would be coming.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Another line in this section says, “Candidate Trump told Gates that more releases of damaging information would be coming.” Any damaging info on a political candidate is fair game, it's been going on forever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: And the left has turned on RR Jesus, they can't keep their narrative straight. The media and the left’s reaction to the Mueller report. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 So... walk that logic out. The same special counsel who found the Page information contained in the dossier was false, the pee tape was false, the cohen in prague story was false, the Trump/Cohen coordinated the hacking of the DNC was false... that same special counsel who found all those things that prove the dossier to be bunk ALSO said Trump pointing that out was obstruction. Weissman is a classy guy. More nonsense: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 So Trump campaign was trying really hard to get the emails. Classy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Emails which were public record and already published by WikiLeaks... but details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts