Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Pretty much sums it up: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 59 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Nobody gets the benefit of the doubt anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Washington Post Op-Ed Suggests Americans May Need To Prepare For War On Election Night If Biden Doesn’t Win In A Landslide by ShelbyTalcott Original Article A Washington Post op-ed published Thursday suggested Americans should prepare for war if the election result is anything but a landslide for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.The op-ed, titled “What’s the worst that could happen?” is written by Rosa Brooks, a law professor at Georgetown University. In it, Brooks notes that the Transition Integrity Project, which she co-founded, “built a series of war games,” gathered participants “and asked them to imagine what they’d do in a range of election and transition scenarios.” “A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 WHAT media/Democrat coordination? Biden campaign has already held a press call about ‘appalling allegations’ in The Atlantic’s crumbling hit piece about Trump 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Trump would shoot us? WTF, people? Have you completely lost you minds? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 It is a real shame Trump cannot sue the media for these all out lies. Still, this "story" was refuted in about 10 seconds with a FOIA (and John Bolton's book, and yes, I will keep repeating this), and reeks of desperation by the Democrats. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 The unhinging is going to get even worse over the next couple months. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Lol...according to the left they need to protect anonymous sources making crazy allegations about a US president, but dox and endanger a salon owner who had nothing at all to do with Pelosi's blowgate. These people are completely insane. Can't say it enough. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 They're not journalists -- they're propagandists with by-lines. This is a disgrace to the "profession". 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Fox News backing up the allegations in The Atlantic. Oops. Now, what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 9 minutes ago, Kemp said: Fox News backing up the allegations in The Atlantic. Oops. Now, what? Wrong. Again. You can’t confirm anonymous sources with more anonymous sources. Lessons you should have learned from the mueller and Russia disasters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Wrong. Again. You can’t confirm anonymous sources with more anonymous sources. Lessons you should have learned from the mueller and Russia disasters. You can't be serious. Edited September 4, 2020 by 3rdnlng 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 I'll say it again ****COINTELPRO**** COINTELPRO (syllabic abbreviation derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) (1956–1979, and beyond) is a series of covert and illegal projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting American political organizations. Except these guys voters are super dumb so it's really kind of overt at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 7 hours ago, B-Man said: Washington Post Op-Ed Suggests Americans May Need To Prepare For War On Election Night If Biden Doesn’t Win In A Landslide by ShelbyTalcott Original Article A Washington Post op-ed published Thursday suggested Americans should prepare for war if the election result is anything but a landslide for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.The op-ed, titled “What’s the worst that could happen?” is written by Rosa Brooks, a law professor at Georgetown University. In it, Brooks notes that the Transition Integrity Project, which she co-founded, “built a series of war games,” gathered participants “and asked them to imagine what they’d do in a range of election and transition scenarios.” “A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 (edited) #JOURNALISM: Big Three Morning Shows IGNORE Huge Unemployment Rate Drop to 8.4%. Time for these again........... Edited September 5, 2020 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 49 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: What’s pathetic here is that we now KNOW the only people in danger of dying from Covid 19 are people who are already retired from the work force. So the reason we have 8.4% unemployment is because our government is telling their citizens that they CAN’T work; not because the citizens don’t want to or because the economy wouldn’t be able to support it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 Karma Multiple boats sink during 'Trump Boat Parade' on Lake Travis in Texas 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 19 minutes ago, B-Man said: Mr President just curious, what shampoo smell do you find the most fragrant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 Whenever the left is ready to accept reality, the rest of us sane folks are prepared to engage in honest discussion and debate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DFT Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 8 hours ago, BillStime said: I appreciate your supplying constant opinion-based rebuffs to all things Trump. But clicking on your link, (I thought you were drawing the group to new facts.) it’s clear that even the sources you’re quoting can’t show a shred of evidence beyond their opinion. For instance, reviewing the source you quoted, her feed reads hateful of Men, Republicans, Caucasians and other things that are really unfortunate. Also, if you review her affiliations, she’s a member of several groups that aligned against Trump before these things came to a head. In fact, her timeline of events shows she is moving from place to place to spread her hatred. All of that aside, she still doesn’t produce anything remotely evidentiary. Just “sources”. so Billstime, my question is (after reviewing your own history posting here), would you believe a Buffalo Bills draft/FA rumor without credibility or proof? Would this board tolerate it, or would it be labeled a “rumor” or be closed due to disinformation? I think we can all follow the conclusion that threads claiming factual information without any incline of proof, evidence or a source are severely unacceptable on a football-driven website. So why is football conversation held to a higher standard than a conversation held around a president, or even more plainly, a human being? Why would we expect standards be met when discussing rumors of little actual importance, but we remove those standards for what’s truly important? my hope is only to understand what I’m told can’t be understood. I want to see your perspective and try myself to better respect them. So this is your moment, to show the board you are better than how you present yourself. I’m trying to do the same. Let’s discuss if you wouldn’t mind. My thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 15 minutes ago, DFT said: I appreciate your supplying constant opinion-based rebuffs to all things Trump. But clicking on your link, (I thought you were drawing the group to new facts.) it’s clear that even the sources you’re quoting can’t show a shred of evidence beyond their opinion. For instance, reviewing the source you quoted, her feed reads hateful of Men, Republicans, Caucasians and other things that are really unfortunate. Also, if you review her affiliations, she’s a member of several groups that aligned against Trump before these things came to a head. In fact, her timeline of events shows she is moving from place to place to spread her hatred. All of that aside, she still doesn’t produce anything remotely evidentiary. Just “sources”. so Billstime, my question is (after reviewing your own history posting here), would you believe a Buffalo Bills draft/FA rumor without credibility or proof? Would this board tolerate it, or would it be labeled a “rumor” or be closed due to disinformation? I think we can all follow the conclusion that threads claiming factual information without any incline of proof, evidence or a source are severely unacceptable on a football-driven website. So why is football conversation held to a higher standard than a conversation held around a president, or even more plainly, a human being? Why would we expect standards be met when discussing rumors of little actual importance, but we remove those standards for what’s truly important? my hope is only to understand what I’m told can’t be understood. I want to see your perspective and try myself to better respect them. So this is your moment, to show the board you are better than how you present yourself. I’m trying to do the same. Let’s discuss if you wouldn’t mind. My thanks in advance. You know Trump won’t provide his DNA for the rape case against him by the woman mentioned above. If Trump is innocent - why not provide the court ordered DNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts