The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency

[Q-baby!]

4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

I should point out that I was raped by one of those women 40 years ago.

 

I will disclose which one right after Trump announces the nomination.

Yeah but you were asking for it! 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Alaska Darin]

8 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Smart people don't trust the mass media. 

[Tiberius]

Just now, Alaska Darin said:

Smart people don't trust the mass media. 

Not true 

[Nanker]

Democrat Party is the official party of hate, insurrection, intimidation, coercion, and UnConstitutional subversion. 
 

Their only “principles” are do whatever it takes to seize power, destroy your domestic political enemies, and loot the public coffers for their own gain and that of their donators. 

[WEATHER DOT COM]

4 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Democrat Party is the official party of hate, insurrection, intimidation, coercion, and UnConstitutional subversion. 
 

Their only “principles” are do whatever it takes to seize power, destroy your domestic political enemies, and loot the public coffers for their own gain and that of their donators. 

 

No doubt - arrest them all?

[Deranged Rhino]

25 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Democrat Party is the official party of hate, insurrection, intimidation, coercion, and UnConstitutional subversion. 
 

Their only “principles” are do whatever it takes to seize power, destroy your domestic political enemies, and loot the public coffers for their own gain and that of their donators. 

 

Correct. 

[Deranged Rhino]

Oof. That's 14% under last year's ratings which were already 20+% down from their previous record low. 

 

 

Was literally hanging out last night with two nominees who had forgotten the event was that night  

[Deranged Rhino]

Oh nooooooooooooo... they got him now!

 

 

 

[GG]

19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Oof. That's 14% under last year's ratings which were already 20+% down from their previous record low. 

 

 

Was literally hanging out last night with two nominees who had forgotten the event was that night  

 

If my wife didn't know they were on .....

[Koko78]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Was literally hanging out last night with two nominees who had forgotten the event was that night  

 

Well, schiff...

 

Hope someone was around to pick up any awards for them.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Alaska Darin]

Oh you didn't know?  RBG > Constitution

 

 

[Buffalo_Gal]

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This is a really goofy line the Democrats, "msm" and far left are trying. Why would a request "dictated to her granddaughter" (you know, the granddaughter with Brookings Institute and Lawfare connections)  have any bearing on her SC replacement? 

Note: no, I do not believe RBG "dictated" that. She may have been political, but she was not stupid. And even for someone like me "installed" really comes across as dumb.  BUT, that would be on par with the feelz and crappy attorney work we have come to expect from Lawfare, and the soft-coup crap from Brookings.



 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[B-Man]

 

JOE BIDEN: “I LOST THAT LINE.”

 

 

As Stephen Miller asks, “Why am I going to a youtube channel to see this and not a major news network or paid reporters at news outlets?

 

(Hint: this is why you lost your audience to YouTube and Facebook guys. Journalists killed journalism, not Facebook).”

 

Earlier: Oops: Did Joe Biden Accidentally Show Us His Super-Secret Teleprompter For ‘Spontaneous’ Interviews Months Ago?

 

[B-Man]

 

[B-Man]

 

#JOURNALISM: Headline: How Charismatic Catholic Groups Like Amy Coney Barrett’s People of Praise Inspired ‘The Handmaid’s Tale.’

 

 

 

Pretty obvious that they’ve got their narrative lined up, facts be damned.

 

[Alaska Darin]

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

#JOURNALISM: Headline: How Charismatic Catholic Groups Like Amy Coney Barrett’s People of Praise Inspired ‘The Handmaid’s Tale.’

 

 

 

Pretty obvious that they’ve got their narrative lined up, facts be damned.

 

Going to be fun to watch the media elect Trump...again.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Anyone surprised ?

 

"Multiple voters characterized by ABC News as undecided—and selected to pepper President Donald Trump with questions during a network town hall—are longtime Trump critics."

 

"While the network claimed its Tuesday town hall 'provided uncommitted voters the opportunity to ask the president questions about issues affecting Americans,' a Washington Free Beacon review of social media posts found that two of the questioners have long denounced Trump.

 

Kutztown University professor Ellesia Blaque—whom ABC repeatedly identified as 'uncommitted' in its coverage of the town hall—praised vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris during the Democratic primary, saying she would 'be there, volunteering' for the California senator in Pennsylvania. The English professor was not shy about her partisanship, calling Trump a 'f—ing moron,' 'pathetic,' 'pig," "swine,' 'punk ass,' and "'LOOSER' (sic) in a slew of 2019 tweets. She is a self-described 'liberal Democrat,' according to her Facebook profile, on the grounds that liberals 'are not motivated by money or power, but by humanity and the needs of the people.'...

 

An ABC spokesperson told the Free Beacon that the voters 'all identified to [the network] as uncommitted.' The spokesperson would not say whether the network took any time to verify those claims, nor did he answer questions about the selection process."

LINK :

 

 

 

[Alaska Darin]

Democrats controlled the Senate from 2009-2015.  If RBG wasn't such a narcissist, she could have stepped aside at any point AFTER TURNING EIGHTY.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Anyone surprised ?

 

"Multiple voters characterized by ABC News as undecided—and selected to pepper President Donald Trump with questions during a network town hall—are longtime Trump critics."

 

"While the network claimed its Tuesday town hall 'provided uncommitted voters the opportunity to ask the president questions about issues affecting Americans,' a Washington Free Beacon review of social media posts found that two of the questioners have long denounced Trump.

 

Kutztown University professor Ellesia Blaque—whom ABC repeatedly identified as 'uncommitted' in its coverage of the town hall—praised vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris during the Democratic primary, saying she would 'be there, volunteering' for the California senator in Pennsylvania. The English professor was not shy about her partisanship, calling Trump a 'f—ing moron,' 'pathetic,' 'pig," "swine,' 'punk ass,' and "'LOOSER' (sic) in a slew of 2019 tweets. She is a self-described 'liberal Democrat,' according to her Facebook profile, on the grounds that liberals 'are not motivated by money or power, but by humanity and the needs of the people.'...

 

An ABC spokesperson told the Free Beacon that the voters 'all identified to [the network] as uncommitted.' The spokesperson would not say whether the network took any time to verify those claims, nor did he answer questions about the selection process."

LINK :

 

 

 

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

Democrats controlled the Senate from 2009-2106.  If RBG wasn't such a narcissist, she could have stepped aside at any point AFTER TURNING EIGHTY.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States

 

 

"Granted that most of the mythologizing came later, but for RBG to decide she was indispensable in 2013-14, when there was a Democratic President and Democratic Senate majority..."

 

"... that could have replaced her with another liberal, was a cosmic misjudgment. (As de Gaulle is supposed to have remarked, the cemeteries are full of indispensable people.) Self-confidence is fine and good, and in her case it was fully justified. But to imagine that through sheer will power you can endlessly defy age and illness is hubris, and we know from the Greeks, hubris invites nemesis — now in the form of a court that will pick apart and discard half her legacy. This is the tragedy we are now facing."

That's one of the most highly rated comments at "Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Refused to Step Down/She could have had President Obama nominate her successor. But she didn’t get to the Supreme Court by letting other people tell her what she could do" by Emily Bazelon (NYT).

By the way: "Mitt Romney Supports Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg Before the Election/Republicans are now almost guaranteed enough votes to replace the late justice before Nov. 3" (Buzzfeed). Romney offered what has become the stock GOP explanation: "The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own."

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Koko78]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

"Granted that most of the mythologizing came later, but for RBG to decide she was indispensable in 2013-14, when there was a Democratic President and Democratic Senate majority..."

 

"... that could have replaced her with another liberal, was a cosmic misjudgment. (As de Gaulle is supposed to have remarked, the cemeteries are full of indispensable people.) Self-confidence is fine and good, and in her case it was fully justified. But to imagine that through sheer will power you can endlessly defy age and illness is hubris, and we know from the Greeks, hubris invites nemesis — now in the form of a court that will pick apart and discard half her legacy. This is the tragedy we are now facing."

That's one of the most highly rated comments at "Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Refused to Step Down/She could have had President Obama nominate her successor. But she didn’t get to the Supreme Court by letting other people tell her what she could do" by Emily Bazelon (NYT).

By the way: "Mitt Romney Supports Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg Before the Election/Republicans are now almost guaranteed enough votes to replace the late justice before Nov. 3" (Buzzfeed). Romney offered what has become the stock GOP explanation: "The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hmm, Mittens must either be getting some good pork in the next spending bill, or McConnell told him he wasn't getting anything for the rest of his term.

[B-Man]

Our “Non-Partisan” Media At Work

by Steven Hayward

 

Original Article

 

Trump hasn’t even named his pick to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, and already the media is stepping up to fulfill its role as the propaganda adjunct for the Democratic Party and its leftward-most pressure groups.

• Like this NBC “News” story:

Trump front-runners ‘antithetical” to Ginsburg’s legacy, critics say

“Critics” say! Which critics? I’m surprised they don’t say “experts” just to give it that special CDC glow. I wonder what Anthony Fauci thinks? How long until the CDC declares that Ginsburg-Grief is a serious health threat that can only be cured if Trump appoints Nina Totenberg to the Supreme Court?

Anyway, to continue:

The women on President Donald Trump’s shortlist to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court do not reflect Ginsburg’s legacy and could undo key civil rights victories she backed during her 27 years on the court, LGBTQ and civil rights advocates warn.

“Just having a woman, any woman, does not cut it,” Sunu P. Chandy, legal director of the progressive National Women’s Law Center, told NBC News. “We need someone with deep civil rights experience and background if we are looking to fill the legacy of her seat on the court.”

It’s really easy to be a reporter in the mainstream media when all you do is rewrite the press releases from leftist interest groups.

• Then there’s Yahoo News, which really lives up up to the organization’s name with this headline and story about a mother of five:

This Is Amy Coney Barrett, The Potential RBG Replacement Who Hates Your Uterus

. . . Barrett is a practicing Roman Catholic and mother of seven. She is well-known throughout conservative circles for putting her religious convictions at the forefront of her work and identity. “Her religious convictions are pro-life, and she lives those convictions,” said U.S. district Judge Patrick J. Schiltz, one of her mentors. . .

Barrett’s positions on abortion stem from her personal background and strong religious beliefs. In 2002, she joined her Catholic university’s faculty. At the time, fellow educators actively opposed ideas of secularization, and especially the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

• Did you know that a Catholic group that Notorious ACB (the correct nickname for prospective Justice Amy Coney Barrett) belonged to was the inspiration for Margaret Atwood’s famous horror novel The Handmaid’s Tale? Well that’s what Newsweek—a former magazine—would have us think:

How Charismatic Catholic Groups Like Amy Coney Barrett’s People of Praise Inspired ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’

Amy Coney Barrett, a favorite to be President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is affiliated with a type of Christian religious group that served as inspiration for Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale.

Barrett, a devout Catholic, and her husband both belong to the People of Praise group, current and former members have said, according to The New York Times. Their fathers have served as leaders in the group.

There’s only one problem, which Newsweek grudgingly admits in a correction appended at the end:

Correction: This article’s headline originally stated that People of Praise inspired ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. The book’s author, Margaret Atwood, has never specifically mentioned the group as being the inspiration for her work. A New Yorker profile of the author from 2017 mentions a newspaper clipping as part of her research for the book of a different charismatic Catholic group, People of Hope. Newsweek regrets the error.

Apparently Newsweek doesn’t “regret the error” enough to retract the story—or even change the incorrect headline. Which means they don’t regret it at all. I’m sure they think it is “fake, but accurate,” somehow.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

Desperation thy name is Ben Jacobs.

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Buffalo_Gal]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Not one tiny bit of evidence...
 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

[B-Man]

Liberal media’s pass on sloppy Joe and scandalous Hunter Biden

by Miranda Devine

 

Original Article

 

The witness protection of Joe Biden by the media is starting to look like election interference. Exhibit A: The Senate interim report released Wednesday detailing millions of dollars Joe Biden’s son Hunter received from corrupt foreign oligarchs and companies while his father was vice president. Despite its obvious news value, the report immediately was pilloried by influential media outlets such as The New York Times and The Washington Post as “inconclusive” partisan echoing of Russian propaganda. “Republican Inquiry Finds No ­Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden,” was the Times’ headline. “GOP’s Hunter Biden report doesn’t back up Trump’s actual conspiracy theory — or anything close to it,” said The Washington Post.

 

 

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[BillsFanNC]