B-Man Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Hillary Clinton The Movie — Starring Glenn Close!Radar Online ^ | March 23, 2017 A movie is in the works about Hillary Clinton and her amazing life, and legendary actress Glenn Close has been chosen to play the former first lady and presidential candidate! The film is rumored to focus on Clinton’s career and marriage to Bill. (Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 She's Webb Hubbel's kid, not Slick's. I thought she was Markie Post's kid, not Slick's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I thought she was Markie Post's kid, not Slick's. Well, Hillary fathered her, but the mother is still unknown. Could be Markie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I thought she was Markie Post's kid, not Slick's. That's not how it works. Markie and Hillary can't have a kid together themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Hillary Clinton The Movie — Starring Glenn Close! Radar Online ^ | March 23, 2017 The working title was going to be True Lies, but that was taken, They decided to go with "101 Donations" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 That's not how it works. Markie and Hillary can't have a kid together themselves. They could use the David Crosby method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 one more.................. Here's a sneak preview scene from Hillary's Election Night 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinRome Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 They could use the David Crosby method. Slick willy work web for the Crosby role? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Poor Chelsea. NYT: Just Like Her Mom, Chelsea Clinton Can't Get A Break. You see, she didn't get a lifetime achievement award. She got an achievement award from Variety in conjunction with the Lifetime TV channel. And punctuation was wrong. So...really...it's just too bad for Chelsea. When it comes to accepting prizes for charitable contributions, Chelsea is in no way an outlier. Everyone in her income bracket has a shelf full of honors. Luncheon ceremonies are a way to publicly thank big-name benefactors, get them to show up to the event, and therefore attract other donors and media interest. Ivanka Trump, for example — just picking someone at random here — is no stranger to vanity awards. She has been honored by organizations such as the European School of Economics and the Diamond Empowerment Fund’s GOOD Awards. (Tagline: “Diamonds do good.”) But Chelsea, like her mother, never gets a break — unlike Ivanka and her father. The “Lifetime achievement” mistake was an error of capitalization that became a convenient Internet cudgel at a time when Democrats are focused on resistance, uneasy about class politics, and searching for the next generation of leaders. Meanwhile, in the real world, the Trump administration announced that Ivanka would be getting her own White House office and high-level security clearance — despite her father’s insistence that none of his children would enjoy such privileges after his election. Nepotism is a charge that the Trumps find easy to circumnavigate. Not so for the Clintons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Poor Chelsea. NYT: Just Like Her Mom, Chelsea Clinton Can't Get A Break. You see, she didn't get a lifetime achievement award. She got an achievement award from Variety in conjunction with the Lifetime TV channel. And punctuation was wrong. So...really...it's just too bad for Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richstadiumowner Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 (edited) America's little hat did it! In fact the Canadian version of the primary had a Monika Lewinski running off against Chelsea Clinton to make it even more !@#$ed up. Be thankful she isn't "hot". But when she promises to legalize weed, you're done. Which banjo song should represent the Clinton Dynasty. BTW? Edited March 24, 2017 by richstadiumowner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Poor Chelsea. NYT: Just Like Her Mom, Chelsea Clinton Can't Get A Break. You see, she didn't get a lifetime achievement award. She got an achievement award from Variety in conjunction with the Lifetime TV channel. And punctuation was wrong. So...really...it's just too bad for Chelsea. Did the Times really write a piece about how the Clintons are oppressed and victims of white (well...orange) privilege? Wait...did the times really say it was unfair that Trump's kid gets a clearance and an office, when Chelsea had neither and was still involved in State business and receiving sensitive info despite that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Concerning an article from the Times that was comparing Ivanka and Chelsea. Are you really this retarded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Clinton was in bed with China and Trump is in bed with Russia. What's the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Concerning an article from the Times that was comparing Ivanka and Chelsea. Are you really this retarded? Yes................yes he is. Why aren't we trying to defend Trump.............................in the Clinton political dynasty thread ? Yes Pasta is just that big a buffoon. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Ivanka got an office in the White House and a security clearance? Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Clinton was in bed with China and Trump is in bed with Russia. What's the problem? Clinton was in bed with more than China. The Out-House of Saud paid millions to the CF because they care so deeply about the plight of women around the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Poor Chelsea. NYT: Just Like Her Mom, Chelsea Clinton Can't Get A Break. You see, she didn't get a lifetime achievement award. She got an achievement award from Variety in conjunction with the Lifetime TV channel. And punctuation was wrong. So...really...it's just too bad for Chelsea. Thank you to the New York Times for shedding light on such an important issue. There should really be a safety net in place so children of former most-qualified-candidates-of-all-time don't ever have to face such hardships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 one more.................. Here's a sneak preview scene from Hillary's Election Night 2016. I'm not going to be ignored, America!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Concerning an article from the Times that was comparing Ivanka and Chelsea. Are you really this retarded? Yes. He most certainly is. Thank you to the New York Times for shedding light on such an important issue. There should really be a safety net in place so children of former most-qualified-candidates-of-all-time don't ever have to face such hardships. I look forward anxiously to the NYT articles about the Obama girls and how they are having such a hard time adjusting to life in their Ivy League schools as they pursue degrees in feminine entrapment in western civilization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 In the span of just two weeks, we’ve been told that Chelsea Clinton is writing a children’s book, has been named to the board of directors at Expedia, and that she’s being given an achievement award for some reason. Are you seeing a pattern yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 In the span of just two weeks, we’ve been told that Chelsea Clinton is writing a children’s book, has been named to the board of directors at Expedia, and that she’s being given an achievement award for some reason. Are you seeing a pattern yet? Her book's already a best-seller, too. No, I am not making that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Her book's already a best-seller, too. No, I am not making that up. Not only do Soros groups pay $15k a month to troll, they'll buy you copies of approved books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. Well put. We fought a GD war to get away from monarchs. No more Bushes, Clintons, Kennedys. The whole idea of the 'career politician' is so anti American, so far removed from what the framers intended in the first place...which is why I believe term limits on all elected and appointed governmental positions is the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richstadiumowner Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 Her book's already a best-seller, too. No, I am not making that up. It's prolly "advanced sales" then it goes into the discount bin in a month just like Hillary's POS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 (edited) Chelsea ClintonVerified account @ChelseaClinton Mar 25 Please tell me this is photoshopped. . . . . Please?https://twitter.com/andrewlofholm/status/845386461524512768 … Andrew Lofholm @AndrewLofholm The cover of the 2017 Lincoln Day Dinner program for Republican Party of Palm Beach County tonight at Mar-a-Lago. @WPTV pic.twitter.com/SJPlB8V6qb Humor was never a Clinton strength............ . Edited March 27, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Yeah, tell me again about "possible" security problems with the current Administration Hillary Clinton Had Astonishing Access to Top Secret Documents After She Left State Department Hillary Clinton may have resigned her secretary role at the State Department in 2013 - but her access to top secret and classified information didn't end then. Under Barack Obama, she was allowed to continue to view highly sensitive intel documents for years - well past her announced run for the presidency in April 2015, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Why? Toward what possible end? So she could better write her memoir. File this in the "You've Got to Be Kidding Me" folder. And it wasn't just Clinton who kept the power of top secret access. It was six of her former staffers, who went by the tag of "research assistants," Fox News reported. Grassley, rightly so, is baffled - not just by the special privilege for Clinton and six of her staffers. But also by the fact that the justification for the access seems so waffley and weak. As he wondered: If the top-secret access was sincerely so Clinton could pen a better memoir, why did the Obama White House hide it for so long? Grassley said he was only able to confirm Clinton's top-secret access after Obama left the presidency. "I have repeatedly asked the State Department whether Secretary Clinton and her associates had their clearances suspended or revoked, to which the Obama administration refused to respond," Grassley said, in a letter sent to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson earlier this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Obama was Clinton's partner in crime (literally) and in doing so insured that she wouldn't be prosecuted. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/440380/obama-email-alias-clinton-why-fbi-didnt-prosecute-hillary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Yeah, tell me again about "possible" security problems with the current Administration Hillary Clinton Had Astonishing Access to Top Secret Documents After She Left State Department Hillary Clinton may have resigned her secretary role at the State Department in 2013 - but her access to top secret and classified information didn't end then. Under Barack Obama, she was allowed to continue to view highly sensitive intel documents for years - well past her announced run for the presidency in April 2015, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Why? Toward what possible end? So she could better write her memoir. File this in the "You've Got to Be Kidding Me" folder. And it wasn't just Clinton who kept the power of top secret access. It was six of her former staffers, who went by the tag of "research assistants," Fox News reported. Grassley, rightly so, is baffled - not just by the special privilege for Clinton and six of her staffers. But also by the fact that the justification for the access seems so waffley and weak. As he wondered: If the top-secret access was sincerely so Clinton could pen a better memoir, why did the Obama White House hide it for so long? Grassley said he was only able to confirm Clinton's top-secret access after Obama left the presidency. "I have repeatedly asked the State Department whether Secretary Clinton and her associates had their clearances suspended or revoked, to which the Obama administration refused to respond," Grassley said, in a letter sent to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson earlier this week. Why would one have to,research foe a memoir? Isn't it by definition something one remembers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Why would one have to,research foe a memoir? Isn't it by definition something one remembers? Maybe she needed to remember which country she was in when she was under sniper fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Why would one have to,research foe a memoir? Isn't it by definition something one remembers? Judging by her lack of recollection during both the Whitewater and Benghazi hearings, I can see why she'd need to research her own memoir. Besides, when you've got to dig through that many decades of lies, keeping them straight in the retelling would pretty much require a significant amount of research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richstadiumowner Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 (edited) She forgot her shoe after a walk across a sidewalk. "Was I wearing one shoe or two?" "Here's the nuclear codes" Libtards Edited April 2, 2017 by richstadiumowner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Yeah, tell me again about "possible" security problems with the current Administration Hillary Clinton Had Astonishing Access to Top Secret Documents After She Left State Department Hillary Clinton may have resigned her secretary role at the State Department in 2013 - but her access to top secret and classified information didn't end then. Under Barack Obama, she was allowed to continue to view highly sensitive intel documents for years - well past her announced run for the presidency in April 2015, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Why? Toward what possible end? So she could better write her memoir. File this in the "You've Got to Be Kidding Me" folder. And it wasn't just Clinton who kept the power of top secret access. It was six of her former staffers, who went by the tag of "research assistants," Fox News reported. Grassley, rightly so, is baffled - not just by the special privilege for Clinton and six of her staffers. But also by the fact that the justification for the access seems so waffley and weak. As he wondered: If the top-secret access was sincerely so Clinton could pen a better memoir, why did the Obama White House hide it for so long? Grassley said he was only able to confirm Clinton's top-secret access after Obama left the presidency. "I have repeatedly asked the State Department whether Secretary Clinton and her associates had their clearances suspended or revoked, to which the Obama administration refused to respond," Grassley said, in a letter sent to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson earlier this week. Show me that's different from Colin Powell's access, or Condi Rice's, or Al D'Amato's, or Laura Bush's access. Until then, it's just whining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 (edited) We're launching Onward Together to encourage people to get involved, organize, and even run for office. Hillary ClintonVerified account @HillaryClinton 36m36 minutes ago More than ever, I believe citizen engagement is vital to our democracy. I'm so inspired by everyone stepping up to organize and lead. Hillary not going away is the best news for Trump this month. Dems have no bench to speak of so Grandma's grand plan is to ask for money and stand at grocery stores begging people to run for office. Why would anyone want to join? She lost to Trump, FFS ....................It's like joining a team that's worse than the Browns I lost the presidential election, so I'm going to continue to campaign..... Bold move Cotton.....Stephen Miller Edited May 15, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 We're launching Onward Together to encourage people to get involved, organize, and even run for office. Hillary not going away is the best news for Trump this month. Dems have no bench to speak of so Grandma's grand plan is to ask for money and stand at grocery stores begging people to run for office. Why would anyone want to join? She lost to Trump, FFS ....................It's like joining a team that's worse than the Browns I lost the presidential election, so I'm going to continue to campaign..... Bold move Cotton.....Stephen Miller Every time you post one of her tweets, I respond to it. This one was "But what if those citizens are 'deplorables?'" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 We're launching Onward Together to encourage people to get involved, organize, and even run for office. Hillary not going away is the best news for Trump this month. Dems have no bench to speak of so Grandma's grand plan is to ask for money and stand at grocery stores begging people to run for office. Why would anyone want to join? She lost to Trump, FFS ....................It's like joining a team that's worse than the Browns I lost the presidential election, so I'm going to continue to campaign..... Bold move Cotton.....Stephen Miller And I love the PAC's motto: “Resist, insist, persist, enlist.” I suggest they expand it to include "Encyst, desist, subsist, untwist." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Teaming up with a Sanders view could be powerful, it did take 43% of the 2016 primary votes, and every one of them MEANT IT.... just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts