1billsfan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I'm amazed that people believe that because of last night that we now have 3 capable starters. We don't know if we have 1 capable starter for the regular season. The Steelers defense has looked like hot garbage all preseason. It was their 4th preseason game and they sat their starters early plus they were missing 3 starters to begin with... You keep all 3 and hope they manage through the season. Given the styles of play, it's a good bet EJ or Tyrod gets hurt if they are the starter. It's not just because of last night. The book on Matt Cassel was written long ago and both Taylor and Manuel have proven to everyone (with the exception of the local media) that they are better than him right now and they are only going to get better. Cassel is a guy who's NFL relevancy past by five years ago. The Bills are a team of the future and they really no longer need Matt Cassel's emergency services. I would imagine that next week in Detroit, Matt Simms will show that he will be able to fill the "emergency" role just as good as Cassel would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 If it comes down to that, call him up during the season. What if he's not available? Tuel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I say keep all three. They really don't need the roster spot even if they keep two kickers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 What if he's not available? Tuel? Simms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Simms. Yikes. http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/15407/matt-simms I'll take Cassel over that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djp14150 Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 You keep all 3 QBs. Injuries happen. Losing a QB mid season is the hardest position to replace. The only deal I could see was a QB fir QB trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecgetty Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 If you cut Cassel now, Belichek will scoop him up fast, and learn Romans offense. It would save money if he's gone but why not keep all 3? Lots of insurance! This is the smartest take on the thread. Cassell would be a Patriot within days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Yikes. http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/15407/matt-simms I'll take Cassel over that. How often do teams get down to their 3rd string QB in games? I don't know, I'm asking, but I'd be willing to bet the percentage is minuscule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 This is the smartest take on the thread. Cassell would be a Patriot within days. All Roman would have to do is create plays which would use Cassel's knowledge of the offense against the Patriots. Roman's plenty smart enough to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 (edited) If he's 3rd, or even neck and neck at 2--- you cut him. And it's not to save money, but to reallocate cap space to something else. It's entirely too much cap tied up in case of 2 injuries. If he's their 1, or clear cut 2, keep him. Edited August 30, 2015 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 (edited) If he's 3rd, or even neck and neck at 2--- you cut him. And it's not to save money, but to reallocate cap space to something else. It's entirely too much cap tied up in case of 2 injuries. If he's their 1, or clear cut 2, keep him. While that argument has merit, Tyrod may or may not have a good chance of getting hurt with his style of play. Then you have EJ, a player who has had a couple injuries already. Then SImms. That's uncomfortable. Especially when it was only two years ago we had 2 QB injuries. It happened to the Packers recently as well. Just as an aside, who would we sign with Cassel's money? What FA do we want right now? Edited August 30, 2015 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBaroo Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I thought the reason we got Roman as our O.Coordinator was because he could design an offense that would utilize a mobile QB like Taylor or EJ. So I think either of those 2 will be the starter with EJ getting my vote. But I think you definitely keep all 3 especially when you look at the cost. We have spent a lot to have a good year - I wouldn't quibble on paying 3 guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 (edited) While that argument has merit, Tyrod may or may not have a good chance of getting hurt with his style of play. Then you have EJ, a player who has had a couple injuries already. Then SImms. That's uncomfortable. Especially when it was only two years ago we had 2 QB injuries. It happened to the Packers recently as well. Just as an aside, who would we sign with Cassel's money? What FA do we want right now? Doesn't have to be right now. Can roll it over. 5m is a starting caliber player elsewhere on this team. But who knows, maybe a lawyer Milloy comes free in final cuts. Sure, it's nice to be 3 deep, but is 3rd wheel a prudent spot to commit 3-4% of your cap? That could be a nice piece of a contract for bradham. Or a starting guard next year. Which would you prefer? Edited August 30, 2015 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBaroo Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Bradham IS great! He seems to really piss everybody off on the other team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 remind me.... EJ's second injury.... Wasn't it a Cleveland Brown who took out his knees on a scramble (many plays) after the Bills put their starting QB out of the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsman623 Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 remind me.... EJ's second injury.... Wasn't it a Cleveland Brown who took out his knees on a scramble (many plays) after the Bills put their starting QB out of the game? yes indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 This is the smartest take on the thread. Cassell would be a Patriot within days. I think people worry too often about Bills players going to NE but in this case Cassel would be a great fit returning to NE with Brady possibly out for 4 games. It's a legit concern, IMO. You never want to help a team in your division but that goes many times over for helping them at their QB position. I'm much less worried about the playbook info than giving them help at the position, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 remind me.... EJ's second injury.... Wasn't it a Cleveland Brown who took out his knees on a scramble (many plays) after the Bills put their starting QB out of the game? Yes, EJ got hit low. Does that not happen in the NFL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I think people worry too often about Bills players going to NE but in this case Cassel would be a great fit returning to NE with Brady possibly out for 4 games. It's a legit concern, IMO. You never want to help a team in your division but that goes many times over for helping them at their QB position. I'm much less worried about the playbook info than giving them help at the position, though. Cassel hasn't been with the Pats for over 6 years now. I doubt he could come in and pick up their system in time to play before Tommy Boy returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 $4.15M in cap savings if he is cut. The Bills do not need to create cap space for this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 What risk ? T.T. and E.J . are far better than captain checkdown 2. Hell Simms looks better than Cassel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 The Bills do not need to create cap space for this season. They also don't need to waste cap money. It can go to an extension for one of the younger guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 If you cut Cassel now, Belichek will scoop him up fast, and learn Romans offense. It would save money if he's gone but why not keep all 3? Lots of insurance! Why couldn't Belichick just look at films of the 49ers for the past few years? They also don't need to waste cap money. It can go to an extension for one of the younger guys. Maybe but I don't see it as a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Cassel hasn't been with the Pats for over 6 years now. I doubt he could come in and pick up their system in time to play before Tommy Boy returns. "McDaniels directed the Matt Cassel-led Patriots' offense as the team finished the season with an 11-5 record." Spent years in McDaniels system but hey, not going to argue with you about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 "McDaniels directed the Matt Cassel-led Patriots' offense as the team finished the season with an 11-5 record." Spent years in McDaniels system but hey, not going to argue with you about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Maybe but I don't see it as a waste. If he's at best the 3rd QB, the odds of him playing are minuscule. If the Bills do lose both guys in a game, they go with Simms and see how that goes. If it doesn't, give Cassel a call and make him a decent offer to return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 The Bills do not need to create cap space for this season. You could roll it into next years cap, if you don't use it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 You could roll it into next years cap, if you don't use it now That too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 If you cut Cassel now, Belichek will scoop him up fast, and learn Romans offense. It would save money if he's gone but why not keep all 3? Lots of insurance! Wouldn't Matt have to learn it first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rayray808 Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 trade one of the three for RG3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihilarian Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 trade one of the three for RG3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 trade one of the three for RG3 no way he gets traded with that remaining contract (2 years and $20M). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 That's the point I hope everyone understands. No one knows these guys better than the coaches do. Whichever QB is chosen to start week #1, I have 100% confidence in the decision the coaches arrvie at. It's great to know we have 3 capable starters if a guy goes down. and an OC we can have some trust in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bster Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 None of the QB's should be cut, at least until after the NE game. With Brady out, I am sure the Pats will sign the QB we release. If the Patriots want to sign Cassel and have him go against the Bills D like he has in training camp.....Sign me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 (edited) Keep the top three. Support whoever Rex et al choose as the starter. Just my two cents. Edited August 31, 2015 by Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 I hope they keep all 3 and put Simms on PS. I don't get the mentality that now we have options, let's start trading them to optimize. JMO, we will be happy we kept our options. This position is SO important it is just fine to have some redundancy. IMO I'm not sure Simms is eligible for practice squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 How often do teams get down to their 3rd string QB in games? I don't know, I'm asking, but I'd be willing to bet the percentage is minuscule. Arizona got into playoffs on 3rd QB last year. Have seen teams down to 4th QB. Note: running QBs tend to be knocked out faster than pocket QBs UNLESS the running QB is shifty and good at dodging/avoiding hits rather than one that has not learned to slide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 What's the point of saving money this late in the game with nothing to spend it on? Can you say MARCEL DAREUS ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Can you say MARCEL DAREUS ?? I'm not sure it's necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Arizona got into playoffs on 3rd QB last year. Have seen teams down to 4th QB. ..... 2013 Bills were down to 4th QB. Oh how quickly some people forget. That said, I'd risk it and cut(trade) Cassel. I can't see him being able to progress us through the playoffs, and I can't see that going with Simms for a few games during season(compared to Cassel) is going to much hinder our chances at making the playoffs. I would definitely take the risk that our #1 and #2 QBs don't both go down for a substantial amount of time(at the same time) during the season, but make it back for the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts