Jump to content

Deonte Thompson or Chris Hogan?


pbanach

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really like DT and he seems to have chemistry with TT which will be important if he starts. They probably developed that from their days with the Ravens 2nd team offense.

 

I don't dislike Hogan. I don't really want to cut him. But I think I'd rather have Thompson.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hogan hands down - reminiscent of Welker in his prime. Hogan has potential to be a stout slot option who can create his own space and has great hands. Regular season producer > Thompson.

 

Also, with how the injury bug has been travelling around, wouldn't be surprised if we kept 7. More likely 6 though.

Edited by ctk232
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis :ph34r:

I agree. I think he's the sleeper here. I think we pretty much know what Hogan and Thompson are. I don't dislike Hogan at all but I agree with those who say other guys could actually play the slot better. If Hogan were cut he would be picked up by another team in short order. Thompson has great straightline and even football speed but his hands are definitely suspect. A better comparison by receiver type is Goodwin and Thompson. They are equally fast, neither has great hands, Thompson is bigger and Goodwin is little & brittle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hogan hands down - reminiscent of Welker in his prime. Hogan has potential to be a stout slot option who can create his own space and has great hands. Regular season producer > Thompson.

 

Also, with how the injury bug has been travelling around, wouldn't be surprised if we kept 7. More likely 6 though.

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

Edited by Kirby Jackson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches. In Hogan's career he has 51. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

Hogan reminds me more of a poor-man's Ed McCaffrey than anything else...though McCaffrey was far more productive (maybe that had to do with having Elway at QB though).

 

And in actuality, your opinion doesn't surprise me at all--I just don't see what Thompson brings to the table that Hogan doesn't, though I do see things that Hogan brings that Thompson doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hogan reminds me more of a poor-man's Ed McCaffrey than anything else...though McCaffrey was far more productive (maybe that had to do with having Elway at QB though).

 

And in actuality, your opinion doesn't surprise me at all--I just don't see what Thompson brings to the table that Hogan doesn't, though I do see things that Hogan brings that Thompson doesn't.

I can trust Hogan in the event of an injury to play half the snaps in a game and not kill the team. If they are going to keep Goodwin which it sure looks like Hogan is a nice compliment at the bottom of the depth chart. I have seen flashes from Thompson but don't know if he can be trusted to do that. As a big play threat he is already behind Watkins, Harvin and Goodwin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hogan reminds me more of a poor-man's Ed McCaffrey than anything else...though McCaffrey was far more productive (maybe that had to do with having Elway at QB though).

 

And in actuality, your opinion doesn't surprise me at all--I just don't see what Thompson brings to the table that Hogan doesn't, though I do see things that Hogan brings that Thompson doesn't.

I can see this. But I can't see him blowing up like Mccaffrey did eventually. What a nice player. Him and Rod Smith were great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can trust Hogan in the event of an injury to play half the snaps in a game and not kill the team. If they are going to keep Goodwin which it sure looks like Hogan is a nice compliment at the bottom of the depth chart. I have seen flashes from Thompson but don't know if he can be trusted to do that. As a big play threat he is already behind Watkins, Harvin and Goodwin.

 

Agreed--I'd still count Woods as a big-play threat too. I know he's the "slow" guy of the group, since he only runs a 4.51, but he's definitely shown that he can get open deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Agreed--I'd still count Woods as a big-play threat too. I know he's the "slow" guy of the group, since he only runs a 4.51, but he's definitely shown that he can get open deep.

the smart football people always tell me that the two most important things in an NFL WR are 1) route running, 2) hands. Size and speed are nice to have but without the other 2 the player won't succeed. Imo Woods was ahead of some rookies in his route running when he came in because he came from a pro style offense. He has demonstrated great ball skills and hands. As many have said, he is the perfect #2 WR. Sammy's top end speed and elite explosiveness, along with the other 2 (he had to develop the route running when he got here and did) elevate him to #1. Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

not just welker, but welker IN HIS PRIME!

 

this is one of those spots that i dont mind if they go either way. pick the guy thats healthy, has the chemistry with the qb they choose, and call it a day. id guess hogan, and be fine with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis to PS, Hogan and Thompson to other teams. Easley to 5th WR.

 

Davis might be swiped off the PS as soon as he is put there.

 

I lean toward Hogan here. He has produced. (I keep underestimating how athletic he actually is, as well as his size.) But his drops concern me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I think he's the sleeper here. I think we pretty much know what Hogan and Thompson are. I don't dislike Hogan at all but I agree with those who say other guys could actually play the slot better. If Hogan were cut he would be picked up by another team in short order. Thompson has great straightline and even football speed but his hands are definitely suspect. A better comparison by receiver type is Goodwin and Thompson. They are equally fast, neither has great hands, Thompson is bigger and Goodwin is little & brittle.

Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is.

 

According to the media, he's a favorite of the WRs coach. He's actually stayed healthy too, which is always the knock on him. I don't see him going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

 

:lol: as soon as I saw that comment I was just waiting for the response...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

Well, they both use SPF 30+???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hogan hands down - reminiscent of Welker in his prime. Hogan has potential to be a stout slot option who can create his own space and has great hands. Regular season producer > Thompson.

 

Also, with how the injury bug has been travelling around, wouldn't be surprised if we kept 7. More likely 6 though.

 

:huh::blink:

 

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

 

Beat me to it... :beer:

 

Yep, might be Goodwin who is the odd man out. Incredible how stacked this WR group is.

 

Goodwin is a lock unless he gets hurt these final two weeks. He's not getting cut.

Between DT and Hogan I'm not sure. I haven't seen enough of DT and I like Hogan's versatility. If I had to chose today it might be Hogan, but ask me after the game Saturday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

 

They're both underdog white WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There it is again. In Welker's 2 best years he combined for 245 catches and roughly 3,000 yards. In Hogan's career he has 51 for 509 yards. He is VERY reminiscent of Welker in his prime. :wallbash::wallbash:

 

I know that this will shock some, but I think that it is Hogan for me.

 

p.s. Every time that someone compares Hogan to Welker they should get their posting privileges revoked. They are NOTHING alike.

not true. I heard Welker bought some Molly in front of a 7-11 once.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hogan. Hogan. Hogan.

 

For me Thompson and Goodwin offer me the same and it is one or the other. I might be the biggest Hogan fan on this forum though and the guy who believes his ceiling is higher than others think it is. Hogan is versatile and has proven NFL production. I wouldn't cut him, no way. I also think if Rex Ryan and Doug Whaley were sitting down today and had to get to 53 Hogan makes it. His problem is he has two weeks of potentially watching Thompson and/or Davis make plays. For me Hogan vs Davis in what they offer is a better comparison. Thompson and Goodwin are speedsters and to keep them both would restrict our flexibility in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I think he's the sleeper here. I think we pretty much know what Hogan and Thompson are. I don't dislike Hogan at all but I agree with those who say other guys could actually play the slot better. If Hogan were cut he would be picked up by another team in short order. Thompson has great straightline and even football speed but his hands are definitely suspect. A better comparison by receiver type is Goodwin and Thompson. They are equally fast, neither has great hands, Thompson is bigger and Goodwin is little & brittle.

find a clip in a regular season game where Goodwin drops a ball...there are none. Goodwin is faster too....yes brittle...but better Edited by enlightener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

:huh::blink:

 

 

Beat me to it... :beer:

 

 

Goodwin is a lock unless he gets hurt these final two weeks. He's not getting cut.

Between DT and Hogan I'm not sure. I haven't seen enough of DT and I like Hogan's versatility. If I had to chose today it might be Hogan, but ask me after the game Saturday night.

 

 

I don't see Goodwin as a lock at all. He is most certainly on the bubble, and constantly hurt or injured it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dump tin can Harvin and the problem is solved. He is hurt already. All being named in this conversation are better than Harvin.

no, they aren't better than Harvin in any universe! Less injury prone, maybe. But so am I and it doesn't make me faster or more explosive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...