Jump to content

Complete 180 in WR Talent


Recommended Posts

You forgot Easley on those lists, he's still around, allthough for how long remains to be seen... Cut day is going to be painfull.

 

All these new WRs makes you wonder if they are setting up EJ to start right away.

Edited by bladiebla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i am hoping that whoever the best of the bunch turn out to be, they can offer versatility and be interchanged to an extent so that they can create chaos and confusion. the raw talent and speed of this group has definately got us excited. add in the potential of the tight end/h back players and it gets more intriguing, even if still far from proven.

 

this is hard to say, but i can't wait for preseason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kaufman has a good shot as being 1 of the 6 WRs. Although he may end up on Practice Squad.

Not good news for Easley although he deserves another look now fully fit.

Not sure how we keep a space for Brad Smith but I would like to see if Hackett can find a role for him.

Maybe it's Graham that is not safe on the roster?

I see Woods as WR2. With the addition of the other WR draftees maybe Stevie can now switch to the slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woods has 4.37 speed. He can do more than make possession plays. And Easley, Graham, and Smith should be nervous. The top 4 look to be Stevie, Woods, Rogers, and Goodwin, with Kaufmann having a real shot to stick given his size and redzone potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woods has 4.37 speed. He can do more than make possession plays. And Easley, Graham, and Smith should be nervous. The top 4 look to be Stevie, Woods, Rogers, and Goodwin, with Kaufmann having a real shot to stick given his size and redzone potential.

 

Great minds think alike Doc !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad Smith should be nervous.

 

Agreed. That's why I put the question mark. With all the competition, plus all the people on practice squad and the new UDFAs he'll need to impress.

 

It's strange, suddenly seeing competition at the spot.

 

Woods has 4.37 speed. He can do more than make possession plays. And Easley, Graham, and Smith should be nervous. The top 4 look to be Stevie, Woods, Rogers, and Goodwin, with Kaufmann having a real shot to stick given his size and redzone potential.

 

Good point. After going over some analysis, he seems to be a real plug and play guy. I see him in instantly at #2, maybe #1 eventually, especially with Rodgers now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woods has 4.37 speed. He can do more than make possession plays. And Easley, Graham, and Smith should be nervous. The top 4 look to be Stevie, Woods, Rogers, and Goodwin, with Kaufmann having a real shot to stick given his size and redzone potential.

 

Word is though that Graham has improved immensely over the off season (bb.com)... Competition is going to be stiff for sure, chemistry with EJ may be an important factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word is though that Graham has improved immensely over the off season (bb.com)... Competition is going to be stiff for sure, chemistry with EJ may be an important factor.

I'm pulling for Graham but I'm also pulling for Easely. Sadly though, Easley's window might have passed, and his injury history makes him a risk.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these new WRs makes you wonder if they are setting up EJ to start right away.

WRs generally need a year to figure out the NFL as well.

I expect improvement this season, but expect 2014 to be the season we see the big improvement in the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A WR that understands how to run routes will outlast a WR that can just run fast. This is why i love WRs like Reggie Wayne, Stevie Johnson, Jerry Rice. 40 is overrated.

 

Great pick up

 

Which guy are you talking about? I can definitely see Woods (who I think is a lock to be one of the starting two) or maybe Rodgers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woods has 4.37 speed. He can do more than make possession plays. And Easley, Graham, and Smith should be nervous. The top 4 look to be Stevie, Woods, Rogers, and Goodwin, with Kaufmann having a real shot to stick given his size and redzone potential.

 

I agree. unless they want to use him for kick returns, Smith gone. Easley has done nothing and is doubtful better at anything than the rookies. Graham was lost last year, now he faces waves of talented receivers who all have what he has as his only gift--speed.

 

It's interesting that it took Marrone to come in to do in a single draft waht Buddy couldn't do in 3--set up a decent WR corps.

 

To answer a previous thread's question as to who was in charge of this draft, I'm sure it wasn't NixWhaley....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I agree. unless they want to use him for kick returns, Smith gone. Easley has done nothing and is doubtful better at anything than the rookies. Graham was lost last year, now he faces waves of talented receivers who all have what he has as his only gift--speed.

 

It's interesting that it took Marrone to come in to do in a single draft waht Buddy couldn't do in 3--set up a decent WR corps.

 

To answer a previous thread's question as to who was in charge of this draft, I'm sure it wasn't NixWhaley....

 

Incredibly arrogant of you, and dead wrong. Nix is the face of this front office; if you don't believe it watch the 25 minute draft wrap up he did with Marrone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredibly arrogant of you, and dead wrong. Nix is the face of this front office; if you don't believe it watch the 25 minute draft wrap up he did with Marrone.

 

Arrogant? Slow down, son! I don't know how you are using that word, but it just seemed obvious to me that this entire sea change of a draft coincided with the arrival of a very energetic, forward thinking head coach. I know it pains you to be asked to look back on the previous 3 drafts and tell me if you can't see it's like night and day between the drafting philosophies (and the overall quality of draftees to this point). But you at some point have to acknowledge the obvious. Do you think this draft looks anything like this with Nix/Chan?

 

Being "the face of the front office" has absolutely nothing to do with my comment. Every GM in the NFL is the face of the front office. You either somehow missed my point, or you intentionally ignored it to prop up Buddy. If he' s doen such a great job, it should be obvious to everyone uniformly and he certainly wouldn't need you sprinting to his defense after pretty innocuous posts like mine above....

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredibly arrogant of you, and dead wrong. Nix is the face of this front office; if you don't believe it watch the 25 minute draft wrap up he did with Marrone.

 

Nix obviously had a great deal of influence, but it isn't wrong to say that Marrone also had quite a bit of input, seeing as he came out of college and knows these players quite well. Ok, maybe he didn't have as much influence as WEO is insinuating, but I am sure that his knowledge helped tremendously in the scouting process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I agree. unless they want to use him for kick returns, Smith gone. Easley has done nothing and is doubtful better at anything than the rookies. Graham was lost last year, now he faces waves of talented receivers who all have what he has as his only gift--speed.

 

It's interesting that it took Marrone to come in to do in a single draft waht Buddy couldn't do in 3--set up a decent WR corps.

 

To answer a previous thread's question as to who was in charge of this draft, I'm sure it wasn't NixWhaley....

I doubt Marrone was in charge of this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Marrone was in charge of this draft.

He wasn't. But he did come in with Hackett and say, "Here is what we're going to run, and here is what we need. We need a versatile QB that can get the ball down the field. We need speed. You can't coach speed. We want guys that can hit homeruns that love to play football. Him and Pettine said, here is what we're going to run. We want aggressive, versatile guys who love football and love to take heads off."

 

And Nix and Whaley went and found those guys.

 

This draft had Marrone, Hackett and Pettine all over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Arrogant? Slow down, son! I don't know how you are using that word, but it just seemed obvious to me that this entire sea change of a draft coincided with the arrival of a very energetic, forward thinking head coach. I know it pains you to be asked to look back on the previous 3 drafts and tell me if you can't see it's like night and day between the drafting philosophies (and the overall quality of draftees to this point). But you at some point have to acknowledge the obvious. Do you think this draft looks anything like this with Nix/Chan?

 

Being "the face of the front office" has absolutely nothing to do with my comment. Every GM in the NFL is the face of the front office. You either somehow missed my point, or you intentionally ignored it to prop up Buddy. If he' s doen such a great job, it should be obvious to everyone uniformly and he certainly wouldn't need you sprinting to his defense after pretty innocuous posts like mine above....

 

Perhaps you don't understand, SON, that the job of a GM is to work with his coaching staff to get the players that staff wants to implement their philosophy. The GM and his staff do the scouting and set up the board. That's Nix. If you like the players they brought in, then you have to respect the job Nix did. It's that simple. Perhaps we all like Marrone's philosophy more, which is why most are so pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i believe that it has a lot to do with who nix is picking the players for. i'm sure that the type of player that chan and wanny wanted are much different than the type of players that marrone, petting and hackett want. and i'm sure that nix and whaley run their draft with a heavy bias on what the coaches are looking for in their players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok guys we added some talent and speed for sure but lets not get too excited yet. There is a ton of work to do here.

 

 

WR is one of the toughest positions to step into. It is hard enough to draft one blue chip WR and add him into an existing offense in a stable system. In our case we have a new QB (Kolb), a rookie QB (Manuel), and a new OC (Hackett) installing a new system. SJ is the only veteran left that is proven NFL wideout. Brad Smith is gone, the Bills are going to develop their picks. Graham is being challenged. Easley is not a safe bet to contribute anything. Then you have this mass of rookies all learning.

 

This will be both exciting and frustrating to watch. At least this new core will develop together. I expect a lot of confusion for the offense in the early pre-season and maybe by week 5 things start to sharpen up.

 

I just hope the OL continues to improve, we will really need CJ and Freddy.

 

- Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a UCLA fan I've watched Woods for years. I don't think it's going to take him long to learn the game. He's very polished already and should step in to be immediate help as a #2. Now, it's still unclear if the Bills have a guy who can actually get him and Stevie the ball...

Oh I agree. I actually think that Woods will start opposite Stevie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't. But he did come in with Hackett and say, "Here is what we're going to run, and here is what we need. We need a versatile QB that can get the ball down the field. We need speed. You can't coach speed. We want guys that can hit homeruns that love to play football. Him and Pettine said, here is what we're going to run. We want aggressive, versatile guys who love football and love to take heads off."

 

And Nix and Whaley went and found those guys.

 

This draft had Marrone, Hackett and Pettine all over it.

I agree that the coaches told the GM's what they wanted. But as you said, the GM's found and drafted the guys. What might have been a difference is Marrone telling them to take a chance on guys with troubled pasts, whereas guys like Jauron and Gailey might have told them to stay away from them.

Ok guys we added some talent and speed for sure but lets not get too excited yet. There is a ton of work to do here.

 

 

WR is one of the toughest positions to step into. It is hard enough to draft one blue chip WR and add him into an existing offense in a stable system. In our case we have a new QB (Kolb), a rookie QB (Manuel), and a new OC (Hackett) installing a new system. SJ is the only veteran left that is proven NFL wideout. Brad Smith is gone, the Bills are going to develop their picks. Graham is being challenged. Easley is not a safe bet to contribute anything. Then you have this mass of rookies all learning.

 

This will be both exciting and frustrating to watch. At least this new core will develop together. I expect a lot of confusion for the offense in the early pre-season and maybe by week 5 things start to sharpen up.

 

I just hope the OL continues to improve, we will really need CJ and Freddy.

 

- Bob

True WR takes time to learn. But compared to last year, the talent level is much better and even though they're rookies, still should provide better play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I would wager that Rogers has significant on-field issues in terms of processing the playbook, running routes consistently, and making mental adjustments.

 

That was a knock on him early. All that and quitting when he wasnt a 1/2 option on a play. Hopefully he's realized his talent doesn't overcome his bad attitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a knock on him early. All that and quitting when he wasnt a 1/2 option on a play. Hopefully he's realized his talent doesn't overcome his bad attitude.

 

There isn't a team in the NFL that isn't aware of his immense physical talents as a receiver and also his heavy character baggage. Probably the majority of teams interviewed him to get a feeling as to whether he was a redeemable player and person..Not one team took a risk drafting him at all. What does that tell you?

 

Is he worth the risk of taking as an UDFA? Why not. If he falters then you cut him. Even if the odds work against you there is nothing wrong betting on a long shot talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the coaches told the GM's what they wanted. But as you said, the GM's found and drafted the guys. What might have been a difference is Marrone telling them to take a chance on guys with troubled pasts, whereas guys like Jauron and Gailey might have told them to stay away from them.

 

True WR takes time to learn. But compared to last year, the talent level is much better and even though they're rookies, still should provide better play.

 

I imagine it more like this: the scouts and GM put together the draft list or top 100. But in the war room, I am convinced that it is the HC's call on who they select at each slot. I can't believe that the HC just gives them a shopping list and sits back while the GM makes the picks.

 

If only the coaching staff knows exactly what they want, how cna they no tbe the ones making the picks? It's the only way it makes sense. EJ Manuel is a good example. Given Buddy's proven inability to scout or pick QBs, the rather shocking move to get EJ at 16 has to have been Marrone's pick. In fact, I'm betting he had to convince Buddy to make that pick. I'm thinking Buddy would have been happy to pick a "safer" guy like Nassib, or, as it was reported, Barkley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine it more like this: the scouts and GM put together the draft list or top 100. But in the war room, I am convinced that it is the HC's call on who they select at each slot. I can't believe that the HC just gives them a shopping list and sits back while the GM makes the picks.

 

If only the coaching staff knows exactly what they want, how cna they no tbe the ones making the picks? It's the only way it makes sense. EJ Manuel is a good example. Given Buddy's proven inability to scout or pick QBs, the rather shocking move to get EJ at 16 has to have been Marrone's pick. In fact, I'm betting he had to convince Buddy to make that pick. I'm thinking Buddy would have been happy to pick a "safer" guy like Nassib, or, as it was reported, Barkley.

Then why wasn't your vitriol aimed at Chan Gailey and not Buddy Nix over the last three years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why wasn't your vitriol aimed at Chan Gailey and not Buddy Nix over the last three years?

 

It was also. Try to keep up!

 

The two of them together, with the 3-4, the 4-3, the curtis Modkins, George Edwards, the Wanny and all of the questionable picks--it was clear that these two were the Keysone cops for 3 years....

 

...and suddenly it's a "180" and that's because the new coaching staff left a better list of "what they wanted"? Not convincing at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was also. Try to keep up!

 

The two of them together, with the 3-4, the 4-3, the curtis Modkins, George Edwards, the Wanny and all of the questionable picks--it was clear that these two were the Keysone cops for 3 years....

 

...and suddenly it's a "180" and that's because the new coaching staff left a better list of "what they wanted"? Not convincing at all.

GMs make draft picks, especially Buddy Nix who is a glorified scout. They work together with the head coach and coordinators and TRY to get a consensus but their job is to make the picks. Some coaches, if they have power over personnel, like Bellichick and Andy Reid, etc, have bigger says. When Jauron was here and we really didn't have a real GM he had bigger say. Nix makes the picks to fit what the coaches tell him they want to run.

 

I have posted earlier that Marrone, Hackett and Pettine were all over this draft, and they were. But that is because they not only have specific wants, but the team was lacking in the important wants. The offense looked for playmaking and speed, the defense looked for versatility and headhunting. We didn't have a lot of those players, and Nix went out and got them.

 

I actually think that these guys just meshed pretty well, between Nix, Whaley, Marrone, Hackett and Pettine, and there really was a clearer strategy and goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine it more like this: the scouts and GM put together the draft list or top 100. But in the war room, I am convinced that it is the HC's call on who they select at each slot. I can't believe that the HC just gives them a shopping list and sits back while the GM makes the picks.

 

If only the coaching staff knows exactly what they want, how cna they no tbe the ones making the picks? It's the only way it makes sense. EJ Manuel is a good example. Given Buddy's proven inability to scout or pick QBs, the rather shocking move to get EJ at 16 has to have been Marrone's pick. In fact, I'm betting he had to convince Buddy to make that pick. I'm thinking Buddy would have been happy to pick a "safer" guy like Nassib, or, as it was reported, Barkley.

 

Buddy and the staff knew in advance who their favored qb prospect was in advance. There was no debate in the room as to which qb was going to be taken. Of course the coaches and the scouts are involved in the process. How else are you going to put together your board and your draft strategy?

 

It's a collaborative process. Ultimately he has the final say. On this particular qb pick he and the staff spent a lot time and effort in researching this pick. Determining who was most influentical in selecting EJ is impossible for us as outsiders to know. There is no doubt that Marrone and the OC had a significant input in the decision, and so did the scouts.

 

It doesn't matter to me whether the GM has an autocratic or delegator style of management. There are different styles of management that both succeed and fail. The GM is the boss of the football operation. He is the one who is most responsible for the construction of the roster. If there is a conflict in opionions in the draft room he is the decider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I love about the infusion of talent and pretty much complete overhaul of the WR corp is the fact that all three are completely different kind of receivers but all with pretty good speed (and one with blazing speed).

 

Woods is pro ready, and very reliable, with decent size and runs great routes. Goodwin is the blazer and gadget guy who can line up all over and be a homerun any play. Da'Ricky is the big physical guy who loves contact and "is open when he is not open" and can go up and get it.

 

Each is nice to have in its own right, the combination is really exciting to me.

 

It also changes your other players. TJ is a crappy #2, but could be a very nice #3 or #4. Easley or Brad Smith is a shaky #3, but could be a very nice #4, #5 or #6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

GMs make draft picks, especially Buddy Nix who is a glorified scout. They work together with the head coach and coordinators and TRY to get a consensus but their job is to make the picks. Some coaches, if they have power over personnel, like Bellichick and Andy Reid, etc, have bigger says. When Jauron was here and we really didn't have a real GM he had bigger say. Nix makes the picks to fit what the coaches tell him they want to run.

 

I have posted earlier that Marrone, Hackett and Pettine were all over this draft, and they were. But that is because they not only have specific wants, but the team was lacking in the important wants. The offense looked for playmaking and speed, the defense looked for versatility and headhunting. We didn't have a lot of those players, and Nix went out and got them.

 

I actually think that these guys just meshed pretty well, between Nix, Whaley, Marrone, Hackett and Pettine, and there really was a clearer strategy and goal.

 

Agreed. GM grills potential coaches about scheme, philosophy etc... Picks his guy. Coach gets scouts and GM his priorities in evaluation. GM puts together a board based on priorities in the coaches schemes/style. From there I think you go by the board but coaches might tag a few guys as priority and the GM makes every effort to get that guy (EJ for example)

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine it more like this: the scouts and GM put together the draft list or top 100. But in the war room, I am convinced that it is the HC's call on who they select at each slot. I can't believe that the HC just gives them a shopping list and sits back while the GM makes the picks.

 

If only the coaching staff knows exactly what they want, how cna they no tbe the ones making the picks? It's the only way it makes sense. EJ Manuel is a good example. Given Buddy's proven inability to scout or pick QBs, the rather shocking move to get EJ at 16 has to have been Marrone's pick. In fact, I'm betting he had to convince Buddy to make that pick. I'm thinking Buddy would have been happy to pick a "safer" guy like Nassib, or, as it was reported, Barkley.

The draft only differed in the types of players the Bills selected. As I said, I'm willing to give credit for taking a chance of risky players to Marrone, who seems like the kind of guy who would tell Buddy he can handle them, whereas guys like Jauron and Gailey wouldn't want/be able to. I think it's fairly obvious that after 3 years and no QB, Buddy had to finally bite the bullet and take one, and might have had to take one higher than people thought so as to not lose him (a la Kaep or Wilson). And while there was likely a consensus, Buddy still made the picks. And the players selected still have to succeed.

 

As for Manuel, I see him as a Kaep/Wilson type of player, i.e. able to keep plays alive with their feet. So Nix taking him isn't such a shock, seeing the success those other guys have had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I love about the infusion of talent and pretty much complete overhaul of the WR corp is the fact that all three are completely different kind of receivers but all with pretty good speed (and one with blazing speed).

 

Woods is pro ready, and very reliable, with decent size and runs great routes. Goodwin is the blazer and gadget guy who can line up all over and be a homerun any play. Da'Ricky is the big physical guy who loves contact and "is open when he is not open" and can go up and get it.

 

Each is nice to have in its own right, the combination is really exciting to me.

 

It also changes your other players. TJ is a crappy #2, but could be a very nice #3 or #4. Easley or Brad Smith is a shaky #3, but could be a very nice #4, #5 or #6.

 

And, ironically, I just caught the tail-end of a show with Mariucci and Irvin focusing on "top prospect" WRs.....where Irvin teaches elements of the pro-game......anywho, what was interesting is the Bills are now in possession of 2 of the top 5(6?) WRs highlighted on the show and who were brought in to work with Mooch / Irvin.....Woods and Rodgers.....pretty interesting and informative piece, especially in light of this draft. Me thinks this could pan out quite well for the Bills in 2013 and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad Smith is a shaky #3

IMO, Brad's got to be gone in this offense, now that we have some size on the outside.

 

He's a long strider, rather than quick, which is what this group is going to emphasize. And I just can't see any Wildcat in the Bills future.

 

And most of all, with a $2.75 million cap save (and $3.25 million cash save) by cutting him, you can essentially pay for Dansby or Moore, should the coaching staff like to add some veteran presence.

 

http://www.overtheca...Bills&Year=2013

Edited by Lurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...