Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. VP of NFL broadcasting said they took Swift concert schedule into account while making schedule. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  3. Randy Moss might disagree. NFL Comeback Player of the Year (2007) 4× First-team All-Pro (1998, 2000, 2003, 2007) 6× Pro Bowl (1998–2000, 2002, 2003, 2007) 5× NFL receiving touchdowns leader (1998, 2000, 2003, 2007, 2009) NFL 2000s All-Decade Team NFL 100th Anniversary All-Time Team New England Patriots All-2000s Team New England Patriots All-Dynasty Team
  4. Hope Repubs don’t take office or you can say goodbye to social security
  5. whoa. that is a punk statement to make. Just save time from labeling yourself an ******* and go straight for the punchline geesh and regarding more positive things the Carolina team is coming back from down 3 games, winning 2 straight, then tonight leading 3-1 against the Rangers That my friends is a Comeback holy cow! If they can pull it off an EPIC game in NY upcoming Game 7
  6. I'm not going to speak this theory but to say that Buffalo has "criminally under prioritised" drafting WR's, I think lacks a lot of context. The Bills traded a first to get Stefon Diggs, The Bills used their first draft choice this year to select a WR and last year drafted Kincaid. Kincaid isn't a WR but he's not a traditional TE either, he's quasi WR and TE. The year before that drafted a weapon in Cook who is a good receiving option. The Bills have been decent with their mid round WR picks, Gabe and Shakir look to be very big successes relative to their draft position. Personally, I would have liked for them to select more WR weapons over the past couple years but the Bills have been right there in the hunt and have come very close to making Super Bowls. It was clear that the Bills needed to get more pressure on Mahomes and they swung for the fences and struck out with the Vonn injury. Very good chance that if he hadn't gotten injured that the Bills may have made a SB. The WR room right now hinges a lot on Coleman's success, if he ends up becoming the WR that the Bills hope for then this WR room begins to look a whole lot nicer, specially when you take Kincaid into account. Even if Coleman doesn't do well, I still think that under Brady's offense which I expect to be much more possession-like football, that the Allen will take a leap this year and make the easier passes like he did against the Chiefs in the playoffs. Allen was making all the right choices right up until the very end, which I believe he will learn from that. And I think learning from that is going to play perfectly into what sort of offense they will run this year. Maybe Kincaid will turn into an ALL PRO TE. That isn't without the realm, I think there was enough that we saw out of him this past year to at least be optimistic of how high his ceiling could reach.
  7. You're charging people an arm and a leg for PSLs. Maybe if the entire stadium was comfortable instead of just a few thousand club seats it would feel like your getting something for your money.
  8. josh is now picking his WRs ? Dinner and some fine wine ? lol But really , why wouldn't you at this point in his career ?remaining hopeful Scantling finds his hands on a more consistent basis considering josh's fastballs Welcome to the boards
  9. I agree with you too a degree Shaw66. Basically all teams and players have gotten bigger faster stronger and more intelligent no matter the position. What you're saying about RB and Wr can basically be said about any other positions. The difference in every NFL game is just a couple plays and those couple of plays can come from anywhere and from nearly any player on the field. To me what makes the difference is coaching and philosophy as well as difference makers no matter the position. Finding these difference makers are what truly makes that difference just look at the Chiefs how many plays did Chris Jones make at critical times during the Chiefs Superbowl runs or Hill , Kelce and Mahomes ? If you do a comprehensive study on Superbowl winners u will start to see a common theme other then having a few difference makers on each team you also have these ultra aggressive playing styles and Mentalities from these teams. Most champions have a physical identity and a mental edge and they play schemes that fit those styles . A bunch of NFL teams won Superbowls playing man to man clutch and grab defense in the secondary not many win playing predominantly zones except for a few. Looking at the Chiefs and Pats the Buccaneers a few yrs bk the Broncos I can go on and on talking about teams that played these physical styles that won it all At the end of the day there's no true formula to winning but u can get an idea about what's needed to have a chance. Some teams get it some don't . I don't believe McBeane has the defensive schemes to be a champion neither do they have the difference makers to do so other then Allen. That's just my opinion hopefully McBeane can prove me wrong and get us over the hump .. Go Bills
  10. What is an admission? Signing MVS? Nonsense - MVS has something Coleman doesn't, independent of what he may or may not contribute next season, vertical field-stretching speed Yes, he's the Beane prototype of a low-floor, high-ceiling type high draft pick, but that doesn't mean he won't contribute. I think your list is way off. First of all, Diggs is not replaced by Samuel. Samuel would be a closer analogy to replacing Beasley, who had a skill set we've been lacking the last 2 seasons - though Samuel can line up outside more. Samuel is not a #1 WR, never has been, unreasonable to expect him to become one. Last season, Harty was the #4 WR, and Sherfield was active on game day primarily for ST. He was the Kumerow replacement and intended to sub for Davis or Diggs in case of injury. Sherfield wound up playing more offensive snaps either in run centered game plans like DAL and LAC (good blocker), because Davis was injured (MIA and 2 playoff games), or because Diggs was taking himself out. Oh, well, yeah, and because Harty apparently sucked. Sherfield will be replaced by Mack Hollins. Hollins is a stud blocker and has been a ST captain apparently like, everywhere he goes (We're looking to replace a bunch of ST regulars including Siran Neal, Matekavich, Dodson, and Sherfield - so I would give Hollins the edge) Our KR will probably be RB Ty Johnson or that tid-bit of a 6th round CB we drafted (Daequan Hardy) with Coleman as an outside shot if we don't like him at WR I would guess the WR corp at more likely: Coleman MVS/Claypool (I predict in the end, there will be only one) Shakir Samuel Hollins battle between Shorter, Shavers, "the battle of the 2nd round picks" Hamler vs Isabella, Thompson, and this year's UDFAs Johnson and Keys But That's just how I see it I think any "it's going to be tough for him to contribute initially" stuff from Beane and McDermott are just "managing expectations for the rookie" talk Shakir MV
  11. Usually I just flip it up with my foot and leave it like that
  12. He failed to understand that I called Dr. K “Doc” but I’m not supposed to question reading comprehension? Shirley.
  13. Clearly you need to have the best TEs in history.
  14. 1. SDS 2. SDS wife 3. SDS bother 4. SDS nephew 5. BringBackFergy 6. plenzmd1 7. mrags 8. in just an FYI, unless we need to mix things up to make things work numbers wise, my three family members would probably go out on their own.
  15. You know what the Chiefs and Patriots, arguably the two most dominant football dynasties of the 2000's have had in common? They won most of their championships without top tier WR's. The Patriots best wideouts in their Superbowl dynasty wins was probably Julian Edelman. What followed him was very meh, but they did have a great tight end in Gronk. The Chiefs, aside from the one year they had Tyreek, the past two Super bowls was JuJu Smith and a rookie Rasheed Rice. They also have had a not too shabby TE in Kelce. This clearly proves that it's not necessary to have dominant receivers to win. You just need smart, heady guys who can make catches and to have a bigtime elite QB who can make the right decisions when it counts most.
  16. They look good. Much better than the Packers or Steelers, for example.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...