eball Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Really, really hate not having Benford, but we get to see yet another installment of your “next man up” 2025 Buffalo Bills. Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 6 minutes ago, sven233 said: Except Coleman is softer than a baby's butt...... He strikes fear in nobody.... He boxes out smaller corners pretty well he just doesn’t catch the ball 😂 1 Quote
Comebackkid Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Mailman said: Wow! What a joke! When Keon coughs the ball up again, someone better be accountable! you realize he's only had one fumble since the beggining of last year right? Quote
Rockinon Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 42 minutes ago, CircleTheWagons99 said: BOLD prediction: Coleman 150+ yards 2 tds..... That's not bold. It's ludicrous. 1 1 Quote
DapperCam Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Really disagree with Coleman playing today over Davis. Maybe Coleman is a marginally better blocker or something and they plan to run the ball all day? Otherwise Davis is a better WR at this point and Allen trusts him. Davis had a big catch on 4th down at midfield last week in the scramble drill. Coleman never makes himself available like that. Coleman also rounded off a lazy route that almost got picked. Coleman is not good. 1 Quote
Comebackkid Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, DapperCam said: Really disagree with Coleman playing today over Davis. Maybe Coleman is a marginally better blocker or something and they plan to run the ball all day? Otherwise Davis is a better WR at this point and Allen trusts him. Davis had a big catch on 4th down at midfield last week in the scramble drill. Coleman never makes himself available like that. Coleman also rounded off a lazy route that almost got picked. Coleman is not good. he did have a td the last two games he played Quote
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Such a sad state of affairs when we are this distraught as a fan base over missing Gabe's 2 catches for 26 yards. Quote
mannc Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, DapperCam said: Really disagree with Coleman playing today over Davis. Maybe Coleman is a marginally better blocker or something and they plan to run the ball all day? Otherwise Davis is a better WR at this point and Allen trusts him. Davis had a big catch on 4th down at midfield last week in the scramble drill. Coleman never makes himself available like that. Coleman also rounded off a lazy route that almost got picked. Coleman is not good. Davis likely suffered an injury in a walkthrough yesterday morning, or retrieving his suitcase from baggage claim… 2 Quote
Psautcsk Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 8 minutes ago, MJS said: I don't know why the Bills don't address this. It is useless putting Sanders at defensive end. If they need another end, they need to sign someone. Morgan Fox, Shaq Lawson? 1 Quote
finn Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago In what universe is Coleman better or more useful than Gabe, who, unlike Coleman a) catches the ball; b) sells routes when he's not the target; c) is a deep-ball specialist; and d) has the trust of Allen? It's perverse. Are they trying to spot the Patriots a pawn, trying to even things up? Did they get a directive from the league to water down the roster? Is McDermott--god forbid--actually relying on Brady's judgment? Shall we make a prediction, based strictly on history? Coleman will not get open, ever, at any time, unless the DB falls down. If he catches a ball, it will because Allen hits him in his unreliable hands. He'll catch two balls on slants, drop a third, and fumble a fourth for a turnover. He'll be dominated by any linebacker, cornerback, safety, defensive lineman, or player-coach the Pats put on him. He'll give up when not targeted, giving his man a chance to make the play on who is. The only possible rationale I can think of (besides the perverse ones) is that they plan to run all day and want Coleman to block. But then why not play a fourth tight end? At least he would be a receiving threat. The man is a liability, one of the worst players on the roster, which is saying something. Benford out and Coleman in. Someone reassure me. My confidence level went from high to "Time to start drinking." 1 3 2 Quote
DapperCam Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Such a sad state of affairs when we are this distraught as a fan base over missing Gabe's 2 catches for 26 yards. Earlier in the year Coleman was being featured in the offense and screwing it up. He’d be the primary target on plays and not getting open. I think he had like 7 targets last Pats game. Gabe Davis catching 2 out of 3 targets for first downs is objectively much better for the offense. Quote
QLBillsFan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, DapperCam said: Really disagree with Coleman playing today over Davis. Maybe Coleman is a marginally better blocker or something and they plan to run the ball all day? Otherwise Davis is a better WR at this point and Allen trusts him. Davis had a big catch on 4th down at midfield last week in the scramble drill. Coleman never makes himself available like that. Coleman also rounded off a lazy route that almost got picked. Coleman is not good. Not sure about the call ups from PS factoring in? Or is Gabe already on the 53? I should know this. Quote
Psautcsk Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, finn said: In what universe is Coleman better or more useful than Gabe, who, unlike Coleman a) catches the ball; b) sells routes when he's not the target; c) is a deep-ball specialist; and d) has the trust of Allen? It's perverse. Are they trying to spot the Patriots a pawn, trying to even things up? Did they get a directive from the league to water down the roster? Is McDermott--god forbid--actually relying on Brady's judgment? Shall we make a prediction, based strictly on history? Coleman will not get open, ever, at any time, unless the DB falls down. If he catches a ball, it will because Allen hits him in his unreliable hands. He'll catch two balls on slants, drop a third, and fumble a fourth for a turnover. He'll be dominated by any linebacker, cornerback, safety, defensive lineman, or player-coach the Pats put on him. He'll give up when not targeted, giving his man a chance to make the play on who is. The only possible rationale I can think of (besides the perverse ones) is that they plan to run all day and want Coleman to block. But then why not play a fourth tight end? At least he would be a receiving threat. The man is a liability, one of the worst players on the roster, which is saying something. Benford out and Coleman in. Someone reassure me. My confidence level went from high to "Time to start drinking." He can catch deflected balls. Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, QLBillsFan said: Not sure about the call ups from PS factoring in? Or is Gabe already on the 53? I should know this. Gabe's on the 53. 1 Quote
Mailman Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, finn said: In what universe is Coleman better or more useful than Gabe, who, unlike Coleman a) catches the ball; b) sells routes when he's not the target; c) is a deep-ball specialist; and d) has the trust of Allen? It's perverse. Are they trying to spot the Patriots a pawn, trying to even things up? Did they get a directive from the league to water down the roster? Is McDermott--god forbid--actually relying on Brady's judgment? Shall we make a prediction, based strictly on history? Coleman will not get open, ever, at any time, unless the DB falls down. If he catches a ball, it will because Allen hits him in his unreliable hands. He'll catch two balls on slants, drop a third, and fumble a fourth for a turnover. He'll be dominated by any linebacker, cornerback, safety, defensive lineman, or player-coach the Pats put on him. He'll give up when not targeted, giving his man a chance to make the play on who is. The only possible rationale I can think of (besides the perverse ones) is that they plan to run all day and want Coleman to block. But then why not play a fourth tight end? At least he would be a receiving threat. The man is a liability, one of the worst players on the roster, which is saying something. Benford out and Coleman in. Someone reassure me. My confidence level went from high to "Time to start drinking." Coleman over Davis is gross, no matter who they play 1 Quote
Success Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago All in all, it's really not that bad in terms of injuries. I hate that Benford can't play, but having Palmer & Bosa is a nice surprise. Surprised about Gabe, but it wasn't like his production was massive. Control the ground game today, win TOP and the turnover battle, win game. Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I dont know what the hell this staff is thinking half the time 1 Quote
Steptide Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Looks snowy in new England. Might bode well for the bills Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.