We Billieve #1 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Did everyone forget about last years big dilemma? How would the Bills survive without any WR talent? They responded be averaging 30 points per game. Yea, we all know Cook is a great player, but so was Diggs, remember? Seems as though Cook doesn't know how good he's got it. He definitely deserves a pay raise, but is he more important than the team, nope! So don't be so quick to say pay the man. He needs to show up to mandatory mini camp, not be a diva, ball out and he will get his bag. Don't forget this important fact... The MVP makes everyone around him better. #GoBills 4 2 3 1 2 1
BuffaloMatt Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago You think he would have learned from his brother. Must be getting advice rom the same person. 2 1 1
hondo in seattle Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 12 minutes ago, We Billieve #1 said: Did everyone forget about last years big dilemma? How would the Bills survive without any WR talent? They responded be averaging 30 points per game. Yea, we all know Cook is a great player, but so was Diggs, remember? Seems as though Cook doesn't know how good he's got it. He definitely deserves a pay raise, but is he more important than the team, nope! So don't be so quick to say pay the man. He needs to show up to mandatory mini camp, not be a diva, ball out and he will get his bag. Don't forget this important fact... The MVP makes everyone around him better. #GoBills One of the reasons we survived and excelled without Diggs is that we had Cook. If the philosophy is to get rid of any offensive playmakers with talent because they make too much money and we can just rely on Josh, I'm opposed. I think the opposite. To optimize Josh's talents contributions, we need to surround him with good players. Josh deserves weapons. Diggs was addition by subtraction. I don't Cook is in the same category. 2 2
Malazan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I think this is the same guy who started the 'pay the man' thread that got closed. It's just a different personality. 1 1
corta765 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Malazan said: I think this is the same guy who started the 'pay the man' thread that got closed. It's just a different personality. Is this thread that spiderman meme of different spidies pointing at each other? 1 1
longtimebillsfan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 53 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said: One of the reasons we survived and excelled without Diggs is that we had Cook. If the philosophy is to get rid of any offensive playmakers with talent because they make too much money and we can just rely on Josh, I'm opposed. I think the opposite. To optimize Josh's talents contributions, we need to surround him with good players. Josh deserves weapons. Diggs was addition by subtraction. I don't Cook is in the same category. No. You get rid of the players that are ME first no mater how it effects the team. I would not be upset if they trade Cook. Get what you can for him and focus on this important season. We don't need thus distraction. 2
DrDawkinstein Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago How soon people forget... about the other 38 Cook threads. 1 7 1
blitzboy54 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago We still have a separation problem at WR. I don't understand why you wouldn't get your MVP QB a toy that would make his life easier. Forcing him to make HOF throws every game seems like a plan that can backfire 2
DrDawkinstein Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, blitzboy54 said: We still have a separation problem at WR. I don't understand why you wouldn't get your MVP QB a toy that would make his life easier. Forcing him to make HOF throws every game seems like a plan that can backfire You mean like a top-of-the-league running game with a feature back who can take it to the house on any play and who now has the power to take over those short yardage/goal line situations in order to keep Josh clean and healthy? 1
TBBills Fan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Keep removing Josh's weapons and watch the offense numbers go down with it. 1
julian Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said: One of the reasons we survived and excelled without Diggs is that we had Cook. If the philosophy is to get rid of any offensive playmakers with talent because they make too much money and we can just rely on Josh, I'm opposed. I think the opposite. To optimize Josh's talents contributions, we need to surround him with good players. Josh deserves weapons. Diggs was addition by subtraction. I don't Cook is in the same category. While I agree with this, I’ll just say I don’t believe the rb position to hold the same significance as wr1, and secondly the roster is in much better shape to replace Cook than it was to replace Diggs imho. I have a strong belief in this oline and Ray Davis in year 2, I prefer to have Cook but don’t believe the Bills season will be determined by the rb1 roster spot.
GolfandBills Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago We needed another one of these stupid posts. Thank god we got one!
MJS Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, TBBills Fan said: Keep removing Josh's weapons and watch the offense numbers go down with it. They don't remove them. They replace them.
Kirby Jackson Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Wasn’t there a rule about how many posts someone had to have before being allowed to start a thread? I thought I remembered something like that?
transient Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, BuffaloMatt said: You think he would have learned from his brother. Must be getting advice rom the same person. You mean the tactics that got Dalvin a 5 year, 12.6M per year average extension in 2020? Say what you will, but under the circumstances it worked for big brother...
US Egg Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Malazan said: I think this is the same guy who started the 'pay the man' thread that got closed. It's just a different personality. The “Sybil” of TBD.
Recommended Posts