That's No Moon Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, iccrewman112 said: To prevent from the bills trading to another team. also Legette is considered raw so having the 5th year option may be desirable. He's already 23, was a 5th year Senior, and is raw. That should concern people. He will be 28 after his rookie deal and that makes signing a second contract difficult because the decline for WRs is pretty much a certainty past 30-31. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: I’d guess 75% this pick is either auctioned off or we trade for JJ / Metcalf / Aiyuk / Higgins Maybe the Chiefs will trade us Kadarius Toney??? 😃😃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said: That’s such a lame point anymore. Players hardly play under the fifth year option anymore. Usually get extended before that And if they don’t sign an extension before the 5th, the team isn’t interested in doing it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Just now, strive_for_five_guy said: Maybe the Chiefs will trade us Kadarius Toney??? 😃😃 hahahahahahahhahaHAHAHAHA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racketmaster Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 9 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Very puzzling to give up the 5th year of player control for what? I think the 5th option is more important for qbs as it gives significant savings in the option year. For other positions, the 5th year option price is often pretty high and not much of a savings at all. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 12 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Very puzzling to give up the 5th year of player control for what? Not the be all, end all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Process Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffblue Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 9 minutes ago, HappyDays said: The dream is still very much alive. Draft two of these WRs in R2, likely with a medium trade up from #60: Coleman Franklin Mitchell McConkey Polk BPA at #95, perhaps with a small trade up to get a true 3rd round graded player. To me this would be acceptable but hardly a dream scenario. McConkey is the only sure thing of those five and he has a relatively low ceiling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billznut Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Beane has already shown his hand of his plan for this years draft and that is to collect more picks and to upgrade the later round picks he already had. Having the #33 pick, which is traditionally always a very very sought after pick, as the first pick of round 2, I would be utterly amazed that his plan isn’t to trade back from #33 as well and continue adding picks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepPass Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 This team needs so many starting players that they need quick solutions and they come in the later rounds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCofNC Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, TFBillsfan said: I’m not mad about trading down but to trade with KC and not make them pay extra is beyond ridiculous! They paid pretty well, getting a 3rd back this year is big 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 12 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Very puzzling to give up the 5th year of player control for what? Beane's pry thinking teams now have 18 hours to see if they want to trade with us. Love having the first pick of the 2nd round. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank Stare Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 14 minutes ago, RiotAct said: McDermott is going to be rubbing his hands together gleefully all night!!! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 14 minutes ago, LEBills said: Franklin is better than any WR that went after pick 9 imo Umm, no. Beyond bad combine and I just don't see adequate separation. NFL CBs will jam him and push him around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsDiehard Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I’d guess 75% this pick is either auctioned off or we trade for JJ / Metcalf / Aiyuk / Higgins Or Samuel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 The only reason people are upset is they assume KC knows better. But their WR draft investments have been meh overall. Rice looks like a good pick but it turns out he's a massive idiot. Moore and Toney and Hardman were straight up bad draft investments. If Worthy becomes a star this turns out to be an all time stupid move by Beane but let's wait and see how it turns out. And I say this as someone that would have been happy picking Worthy in the 1st, but his flaws are real and it's possible he doesn't ever come close to reaching his potential. 2 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Well, here's an idea. Let's trade down 3 or 4 more times and get every pick in the 5th round. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 27 minutes ago, Lost said: Mitchell is probably the only way to salvage this nightmare of a draft at this point. Holy ***** this is epic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurelius Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Truth be told, people get hung up on drafting the highest pick etc. Having a low first rounder is ripe for trade downs and can get HUGE value to move up draft spots all over. Frankly it has more trade value than trading talented roster guys. We didn’t give up anybody thus far that we wanted (and was available to us), which I think is the overall point. I think we did great by trading down and thought it was likely. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NORWOODS FOOT Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 11 minutes ago, Einstein said: Maybe we can trade #33 to KC for a box of crackers. IDK They got Worthy, we are already toast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts