Alphadawg7 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) This is a move that I do think makes the Ravens better…how much is yet to be seen, but seems like a no brainer fit. Makes the Saquon deal look even worse IMO. Edited March 12 by Alphadawg7 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 dang Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nester Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Darn, this was our move. However i don't think we could have afforded him. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Well it was always him or Saquon unless they missed out on both. Maybe if they get to the AFCC they won’t lose their identity and throw the ball 80% of their plays again… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heels20X6 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Sigh...was hoping he'd be a signing this year. Him and Cook would have....cooked. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Not thrilled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen2D̶i̶g̶g̶s̶TBD Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 If $10 Million per year is the high end of the RB market, I think we can afford a cheap power back to compliment James Cook later in free agency like Dobbins, Foreman, or AJ Dillon. 3 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 Just now, Allen2Diggs said: If $10 Million per year is the high end of the RB market, I think we can afford a cheap power back to compliment James Cook later in free agency like Dobbins, Foreman, or AJ Dillon. I hit agree if the right bargain is there, cuz with 11 picks we can also draft a cheap one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, BBFL said: Well it was always him or Saquon unless they missed out on both. Maybe if they get to the AFCC they won’t lose their identity and throw the ball 80% of their plays again… That was suxh a bizzare gameplan. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan in Cleveland Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, Allen2Diggs said: If $10 Million per year is the high end of the RB market, I think we can afford a cheap power back to compliment James Cook later in free agency like Dobbins, Foreman, or AJ Dillon. Agree. Go after Dillon 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Jerk Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 I would rather have Henry at $8M than Barkley at $12M. So not sure what the Eagles were thinking if they could have had Henry for 2/3rds the price. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 i'm ok not having him. i don't think he has much left 3 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBFL Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said: I would rather have Henry at $8M than Barkley at $12M. So not sure what the Eagles were thinking if they could have had Henry for 2/3rds the price. I mean, I get it to an extent; Saquon is a absolute 3 down back that isn’t overlooked in the passing game. Henry, whilst a beast in his own right, isn’t that dynamic a receiving threat. Probably had to pay more than anyone else to secure his services? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo1105 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I think the Henry tank is on E so I’m not as scared of it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo44 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Problem is Lamar is still their QB come playoff time - All he does is find ways to lose 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Would have liked him, but not at that price. Time to target someone like Dillon at a more palatable price. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweats Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I was really kind of hoping that i'd come on here today to learn that the King was coming to B-lo...........................sigh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 This was a no brainer and worst case scenario for those that didn’t want to see Henry succeed 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 8 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: I would rather have Henry at $8M than Barkley at $12M. So not sure what the Eagles were thinking if they could have had Henry for 2/3rds the price. I’d rather have Henry for 3/3rds the price Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.