strive_for_five_guy Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 20 minutes ago, phypon said: I really hope you are joking. See, here is the difference between you and me. I'm not discounting him because he is a minority. I'm discounting him because he has no OC experience. We just went down that road with Dorsey and look how that turned out. It's actually a disservice to Thad and somehow you can't see that and instead want to try to spin it into a feel good story. I don't know what else to say to people like you. If you don’t have OC experience, you know how you get some? You interview for an OC gig, and fingers crossed, eventually convince someone you are qualified and get hired. Assuming you’ve landed a job in life, hopefully your first employer saw more of your potential than you’re giving Thad credit for. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: Fair. But then his work with Baker is impressive. And we know former NFL QBs (even mediocre ones) tend to get a leg up when it comes to QB and OC coaching. Witness Ken Dorsey for instance. It’s a cautionary tale. I’m sure it was a collaborative effort but I tend to think the guy designing the offense and calling plays should get more credit. Like Daboll and Dorsey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Firebaugh Kid Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Sorry, triggered. Drought flashback. Oh, now that I've collected myself........no. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Positive Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Bangarang said: It’s a cautionary tale. I’m sure it was a collaborative effort but I tend to think the guy designing the offense and calling plays should get more credit. Like Daboll and Dorsey. Brian Callahan just got a HC job and he has called zero plays in college or the NFL. Not a one. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Bangarang said: It’s a cautionary tale. I’m sure it was a collaborative effort but I tend to think the guy designing the offense and calling plays should get more credit. Like Daboll and Dorsey. Sure. But then how does any coach ever step up through the ranks? You look at QB coaches who have got the most out of their Quarterback. I tend to think Thad did better at that than Joe Brady this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chongli Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 A little disappointed about the implications here that the reason Thad Lewis will be interviewed is because of the Rooney rule. He will be interviewed because he is one of the best candidates for the job, period. His work elevating Baker Mayfield's game this season was phenomenal. He is a young and upcoming coach who will soon be a coordinator. The same flawed reasoning can be said of sideline reporters, who are part of the three- or four-person broadcasting crew. They are not meant to be "eye candy". They are hired for their phenomenal reporting skills. To say otherwise demeans them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Just now, Low Positive said: Brian Callahan just got a HC job and he has called zero plays in college or the NFL. Not a one. But his dad is a coach sooooo....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said: If you don’t have OC experience, you know how you get some? You interview for an OC gig, and fingers crossed, eventually convince someone you are qualified and get hired. Assuming you’ve landed a job in life, hopefully your first employer saw more of your potential than you’re giving Thad credit for. Would you take Thad over Brady? Do you give more credit to Thad than Brady? So tell me your pick, Thad or Brady? Those are your two choices and tell me why you are choosing one over the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 IMO, if you want to be an NFL coordinator or coach, you need to spend your own money on the quality agent to represent you. As I've said many times over the years, Juan Castillo's agent belongs in the agent hall of fame. Whoever he or she is, they got that guy more jobs than he ever actually deserved. I think Todd Bowles hired the same person. 90% of the hires are because of pre-existing relationships. X knows Y, or worked with Z, or T vouches for... I don't feel bad for Thad Lewis. A good interview gets him that relationship. Perhaps a college calls up the Bills FO because they want to hire him as head coach. Or perhaps the Bills need a coach next year, and that interview impressed them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said: I hate that any black coach who gets an interview gets "Rooney Rule" shouted at them Ironically, this common reaction is evidence of why the Rooney Rule needs to exist. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, phypon said: Would you take Thad over Brady? Do you give more credit to Thad than Brady? So tell me your pick, Thad or Brady? Those are your two choices and tell me why you are choosing one over the other. I'd pick Brady because he has called plays for us and done okay. But if we had fired Dorsey just, as in this week after the season, and I was comparing like for like in terms of who, as a QB coach, had got their QB playing with the best fundamentals of their career and maximised their talents then I think there would be a legit case for taking Thad over Joe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I'd pick Brady because he has called plays for us and done okay. But if we had fired Dorsey just, as in this week after the season, and I was comparing like for like in terms of who, as a QB coach, had got their QB playing with the best fundamentals of their career and maximised their talents then I think there would be a legit case for taking Thad over Joe. I totally agree with that line of thinking. 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Just now, phypon said: I totally agree with that line of thinking. 100% To be clear I am not arguing for them hire Thad. I think, as you do, thst the Bills should be looking for playcalling experience. But there will be first time OCs hired in this cycle without playcalling experience. And of the names in that hat Thad is a credible name. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) 1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said: The problem I have with this interview is that (at least to me) signifies that a real OC search is not about to happen. The job is Joe's. Just like it was Ken's in the last OC search. They are choosing comfortable over what may be better for the development and growth of the offense. There are plenty of minority candidates with better qualifications if they wanted to conduct a true search for OC. Perhaps ask for permission to interview EB? Duce Staley. This is a farce to meet a rule. Different conversation from the Rooney Rule, but I for one will not be satisfied if the entire interview process amounts to just Thad Lewis and Joe Brady. We have an elite QB in the prime of his career. Any offensive coach looking to take a step up in their career should be pounding on our door. Run a full and extensive interview process, approach each candidate with complete objectivity, and hire the best one. If that's Brady, so be it. Part of me wonders if Dorsey getting fired will make some potential candidates hesistant. You're choosing to work with a defensive head coach who has a history of not spending ample resources on the offense, and one OC already got the axe after leading a productive offense. I think most NFL coaches are arrogant enough about their own abilities to look past that, but it's something to consider. Edited January 26 by HappyDays 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julian Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 So where are the sons of black head coaches and coordinators? Are they not not eligible for the nepotism sweepstakes ? Do the sons of black coaches not follow in their father’s footsteps ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 hours ago, The Jokeman said: Last Bills game I attended was Thad vs the Bengals. Great game but sad ending. Unfortunately, that recap applies to way too many Bills games over the past few years… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Explain Nate Hackett? Or Pat Shurmur having two chances to be a head coach? Or Rob Ryan? Or Andy Reid’s ex heroin son being a d line coach? Or garbage Brian Schottmeir? Or a million other examples. im not saying it’s all racism but it isn’t just the best guys getting the job. There is a guy in high school or college who is a million times better than Hackett but will never get a chance because is dad wasn’t a nfl coach or he’s not friends with the right people. Sure, but the rooney rule doesn't help those situations at all. It is a rule that doesn't really do anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 27 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Sure. But then how does any coach ever step up through the ranks? You look at QB coaches who have got the most out of their Quarterback. I tend to think Thad did better at that than Joe Brady this year. My biggest concern with giving a guy that has such limited coaching experience an entire offense to run is how diverse will his play sheet and play calling be. Will he have enough credibility to have an offense buy into what he is preaching? It’s not as though he’s worked under some offensive gurus either. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 25 minutes ago, phypon said: Would you take Thad over Brady? Do you give more credit to Thad than Brady? So tell me your pick, Thad or Brady? Those are your two choices and tell me why you are choosing one over the other. I want an experienced play caller. That's been my desire going to back to the 2022 offseason when we hired Dorsey, and I was not a fan of that hire for that reason. That being said it is not realistic to only interview experienced play callers. There are simply not too many of them that are worth interviewing that don't already have jobs. But there are people like Ben Johnson and Bobby Slowik and Shane Steichen who had never called plays but found immediate success in year one as OCs. So it is possible to find a home run from that pool of candidates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaw66 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 hours ago, HappyDays said: 1. It isn't unfortunate for Thad Lewis, who gets much needed interview experience with one of the best organizations in the league. Maybe he surprises us and we peg him for future jobs. 2. Things change very quickly in the NFL. I am a proponent of interviewing as many qualified candidates as possible since there is nothing to lose. 1. Yes, and 2. Yes. Beane and McDermott are not stupid. They aren't close to being stupid. They're going to do whatever they think will make the team better. When Brady took over, I didn't see fireworks on the field. I'd say the offense was better than under Dorsey, but it still was the Daboll offense, reworked. In his interview, Brady has to explain his plan for the offense, his vision. If his plan is Daboll's offense, tweaked, well fine, that's one way to go. But McDermott and Beane understand that Daboll's isn't the only vision; they're going to want to hear what ideas other guys have. If Brady wants to install his vision rather than Daboll's, then Brady's vision is going to have compete what those other guys are thinking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.