Coach Tuesday Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Crayonz! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Okay.... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) 13 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Chiefs or Broncos/Raiders at Ravens or at Browns At Lions or at Packers/Vikings Not that much can happen. And the Texans are straight up better than the Chiefs. If you can’t see that have your eyes checked. Not sure if you’re aware but no playoff team is promised games plural. It’s one loss and you’re out for everyone. Thats what you get out of what I said? I been watching football for over 40 years and you think I don't know that playoffs are one and done? As a different seed the Bills would be on the road for sure. As the 2 seed the Bills would get at least one home game guaranteed. Come on bro this aint rocket science. Why post that? The Bills aren't resting starters next week. Edited January 1 by Scott7975 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: If this scenario plays out: Ravens beat Steelers, Jags beat Titans, Texans beat Colts. with a win the Bills would be #2 and host the Texans with a loss the Bills are #6 and travel to KC Does anyone who actually watches football think that the Chiefs are a better team than the Texans? They’re not. The Texans, even in Buffalo, are a faaaaaaaaar greater threat. In addition there would be a great scheduling advantage in the 2024 by finishing 2nd. The ONLY two reasons for playing starters would be some foolish pride over a division title. That’s a hard pass. And: Concern about having to play the Ravens in the Divisional round instead of the AFCCG. I can see this one but you’d probably have to play them at some point anyway. Conclusion: Sit ‘em, and it’s not close. The fish might do the same though. Skylar vs. Kyle? It’d be fun watching Collinsworth explain, right? He’d say right 900 times right? Lay off the crack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Cranyonz back in form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 1 Author Share Posted January 1 16 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: Thats what you get out of what I said? I been watching football for over 40 years and you think I don't know that playoffs are one and done? As a different seed the Bills would be on the road for sure. As the 2 seed the Bills would get at least one home game guaranteed. Come on bro this aint rocket science. Why post that? The Bills aren't resting starters next week. You straight up said we get two home games. What was that supposed to mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) 4 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: You straight up said we get two home games. What was that supposed to mean? No I did not. I straight up said "Winning the 2 seed means home games" It means that the first is guaranteed and if advanced the div round is too, versus not getting a home game at all. Also possible to get a AFCCG at home as well if the Ravens lost. Do you not know how this works after trying to educate me? Edited January 1 by Scott7975 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YattaOkasan Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: If this scenario plays out: Ravens beat Steelers, Jags beat Titans, Texans beat Colts. with a win the Bills would be #2 and host the Texans with a loss the Bills are #6 and travel to KC Does anyone who actually watches football think that the Chiefs are a better team than the Texans? They’re not. The Texans, even in Buffalo, are a faaaaaaaaar greater threat. In addition there would be a great scheduling advantage in the 2024 by finishing 2nd. The ONLY two reasons for playing starters would be some foolish pride over a division title. That’s a hard pass. And: Concern about having to play the Ravens in the Divisional round instead of the AFCCG. I can see this one but you’d probably have to play them at some point anyway. Conclusion: Sit ‘em, and it’s not close. The fish might do the same though. Skylar vs. Kyle? It’d be fun watching Collinsworth explain, right? He’d say right 900 times right? Pretty foolish to call trying for 2 home playoff games for a 7-1 team at home “foolish pride”. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 1 Author Share Posted January 1 1 minute ago, Scott7975 said: No I did not. I straight up said "Winning the 2 seed means home games" It means that the first is guaranteed and if advanced the div round is too versus not getting a home game at all. Ok don’t get all ticked at other people because you write poorly. When an “s “ is attached at the end of a word such as “game” it connotes plural. Plural means more than one. If you want to communicate an idea, think it through. If you fail to do that, no biggie, just don’t lash out at others. It’s a bad look. Just now, YattaOkasan said: Pretty foolish to call trying for 2 home playoff games for a 7-1 team at home “foolish pride”. Your tune may change before 8PM Sunday after watching the Chiefs struggle with the Easton Sticks and the Texans curb stomp the Colts. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) I know it's only Jan 1st, but so far this is the dumbest post of the year. I posted in another thread if difference between winning and losing was the 5th vs 6th seed, then yeah, but to give up 2 definite home games and likely playing the second week in Baltimore is crazy. Edited January 1 by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) 12 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Ok don’t get all ticked at other people because you write poorly. When an “s “ is attached at the end of a word such as “game” it connotes plural. Plural means more than one. If you want to communicate an idea, think it through. If you fail to do that, no biggie, just don’t lash out at others. It’s a bad look. Your tune may change before 8PM Sunday after watching the Chiefs struggle with the Easton Sticks and the Texans curb stomp the Colts. First of all I wrote plural because plural is possible. Second, you got smart with me first. Yeah dude, roll eyes. I'm right. It's not my fault you had a crap take and you wanna deflect. Edited January 1 by Scott7975 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: If this scenario plays out: Ravens beat Steelers, Jags beat Titans, Texans beat Colts. with a win the Bills would be #2 and host the Texans with a loss the Bills are #6 and travel to KC Does anyone who actually watches football think that the Chiefs are a better team than the Texans? They’re not. The Texans, even in Buffalo, are a faaaaaaaaar greater threat. In addition there would be a great scheduling advantage in the 2024 by finishing 2nd. The ONLY two reasons for playing starters would be some foolish pride over a division title. That’s a hard pass. And: Concern about having to play the Ravens in the Divisional round instead of the AFCCG. I can see this one but you’d probably have to play them at some point anyway. Conclusion: Sit ‘em, and it’s not close. The fish might do the same though. Skylar vs. Kyle? It’d be fun watching Collinsworth explain, right? He’d say right 900 times right? Epic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 This thread should be locked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 You remind me of a strange former poster..🤔 Oh yeah! YOU!!🤣 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donuts and Doritos Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Bills were an Offside penalty away from loosing to KC. Play for the 2 seed. Plus we need the game to try to straighten out the passing game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_In_NH Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 zero chance...zero and it is ludicrous to suggest it. It is not as simple just Bills Vs Chiefs or Bills vs Texans.....the goal has nothing to do with who you play wildcard weekend, it is winning the superbowl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Nice work, sir. Brilliant. 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 1 Author Share Posted January 1 4 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: Epic We’ll need #91 as I’m sure you know. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
without a drought Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: If this scenario plays out: Ravens beat Steelers, Jags beat Titans, Texans beat Colts. with a win the Bills would be #2 and host the Texans with a loss the Bills are #6 and travel to KC Does anyone who actually watches football think that the Chiefs are a better team than the Texans? They’re not. The Texans, even in Buffalo, are a faaaaaaaaar greater threat. In addition there would be a great scheduling advantage in the 2024 by finishing 2nd. The ONLY two reasons for playing starters would be some foolish pride over a division title. That’s a hard pass. And: Concern about having to play the Ravens in the Divisional round instead of the AFCCG. I can see this one but you’d probably have to play them at some point anyway. Conclusion: Sit ‘em, and it’s not close. The fish might do the same though. Skylar vs. Kyle? It’d be fun watching Collinsworth explain, right? He’d say right 900 times right? Worst Haiku yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.