Jump to content

Tyler Dunne story on McDermott - 3 parts, 25 interviews, one damning conclusion


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

I fully acknowledge that Dunne likely has a bias here, but it seems appropriate to question the character of a guy who praises the 9/11 terrorists organizational ability and won't take responsibility, like when he reportedly blamed the offense for 13 seconds, 

 

I mean.. imagine the shock after losing that game though.  Obviously he's deflecting blame and pissed off.  In a loss like that, everyones pointing fingers - the seasons over and everyones unhappy. 

 

I like the idea of getting some understanding of the locker room and the long form story.  But to just take like... quotes about something that happened years ago and not really contextualize it.  Were people arguing?  People say dumb stuff when they're arguing. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


my grain of salt is Bill B comes across as a narcissistic control freak too as did Parcels. Polian was widely reported to be a complete ahole. I think to be an nfl coach some of these personality defects are a feature not a bug. 

 

Yeah, but those are coaching legends who don't crap their pants when the game is on the line and have 12 men on the field, call timeouts that help the other team, throw dumb challenge flags, have the defense out of position and generally unprepared, have the offense take a knee, and everything else that McDermott does to lose games. I could care less about this hit piece and whatever aspects of his personality are being discussed here.

 

I don't care if he's a jerk or a saint, I care if he can coach. And at this point, he has proven THAT HE CANNOT. He is SINGLEHANDEDLY losing this team games with his cowardly, deer-in-headlights coaching in any tight game. Enough is enough. That's why he needs fired, not because of any of this crap. It's remarkable how obviously bad he is whenever the game is on the line. He's the anti-clutch and everyone knows it. Dump this hack already.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

 

I mean.. imagine the shock after losing that game though.  Obviously he's deflecting blame and pissed off.  In a loss like that, everyones pointing fingers - the seasons over and everyones unhappy. 

 

I like the idea of getting some understanding of the locker room and the long form story.  But to just take like... quotes about something that happened years ago and not really contextualize it.  Were people arguing?  People say dumb stuff when they're arguing. 

 

It's understandable to give him the benefit of the doubt, I just don't think that leeway is appropriate anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, McBean said:

Getting caught up on WGR from yesterday where a caller named Sean called in to Schoop and Bulldog saying McDermott doesn’t deserve this treatment and bad publicity…

 

Well Sean, if you are on here, I’d like to say to you…WHAT AN ABSOLUTE HORRIBLE BS COMMENT AND RANT!

 

MCDERMOTT owes this fan base and city an apology. He owes us a resignation. 
 

What McDermott has done for us? He hasn’t done a mother bleepin thing but screw it all up. ANDY DALTON broke the streak followed up by the selection of JOSHUA ALLEN AS QB THAT OUR BUM HC HAS HID BEHIND.

 

If people credit McDermott for turning this around and not Allen, you are on drugs. Insanity!

 

Oh stop with this Dalton ended our streak nonsense.  That's loser mentality, same as the diaper wearers who always say we "didn't deserve to win" our close games.  Similar to when all someone sees is the 1 turnover in a 4 TD game.

 

The rest of the game matters.  The rest of the season matters.  Dalton was a great story, but NO MORE RELEVANT to our season or success than any other play or game through our or anyone else in the AFC's season.  We won as many games as we needed to win.  Anything else is irrelevant because Dalton doesn't even get mentioned if we had a different result in ANY of our games.  One additional win or loss and what someone else did for another team isn't even a blip on our radar.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


my grain of salt is Bill B comes across as a narcissistic control freak too as did Parcels. Polian was widely reported to be a complete ahole. I think to be an nfl coach some of these personality defects are a feature not a bug. 

 

Behind the scenes Bill is supposedly a funny guy from what his players/coaches have said. He is the opposite of his press conferences with the media where he sounds like a robot or a miserable guy answering questions. He has earned the right to be a control freak with his 9 Super Bowl appearances and 6 Lombardi trophies. Winning buys you credibility with the players, coaching staff, and fans.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

I fully acknowledge that Dunne likely has a bias here, but it seems appropriate to question the character of a guy who praises the 9/11 terrorists organizational ability and won't take responsibility, like when he reportedly blamed the offense for 13 seconds, 

What coaches or players said McDermott blamed the offense? I didn’t see any name’s attached to said events. Did you? Not saying it’s not true but there’s zero proof that it is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

Ok.

 

Reporters should only report complimentary descriptions from sources.

It's an opinion piece it isn't news, and why don't you find where I said they shouldn't do either of those things you decided to just copy and paste if that's what you're saying. Someone said it didn't attack his character it did, saying it didn't is just ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.  Goodwin was in my opinion a lousy route runner and poor at tracking the ball while he was with Buffalo.  It was only when he got over making "career decisions" to save himself for his Olympic dreams and decided to earn his contract with San Francisco that his abilities as a WR leveled up.

 

I mean, Come On Man, in his 4 years in Buffalo he had a catch % of 44%.  Even in SFO his first year it was 53%.  You do you, but painting that as "perfect for Allen's cannon" strikes me as highly revisionist.  Foster Part Deux.

 

He was good enough to get 58 catches for just shy of 1000 yards with Brian Hoyer, Jimmy Garrapololololololol, and CJ Beathard as his QBs in SF the year after leaving Buffalo.  He is better than Robert Foster who is what Allen had.  His problem was he was made of glass.  At the time we got him, he was one of the fastest receivers in the league which is great for a guy that can blaze a ball 50-60 yards with the flick of a wrist.  I don't care that he wasn't a good route runner.  With a QB like Allen all I need is for him to run streaks down the field and play decoy while Allen has two other very good receivers to throw to.  He'd get some big plays too.

 

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

You're entitled to your opinion but no, while I wouldn't say they were terrible, I don't think that's a particularly talented crew, especially for a raw rookie QB.  I grant that the OL was halfway decent.  You're kinda stretching Chandler's productivity.  He did have one >600 yd year.

 

As you are entitled to your opinion but no, it was a talented group.  Watkins and Woods alone is a talented group.  Way more talented than what Allen had in fat ass no effort Benjamine and Zay Jones who is decent now but not back then.  As for Chandler he is about the same as Clay, who Allen had.  I said he was a 500-600 yards guy.  That isn't a stretch.  He had 497, 655, and 571 yards.  Thats exactly what I said... 500-600 yards.

 

This whole argument was can he make the playoffs with Marrone and that group. Not about whether the group was world beaters.  Yes, he makes the playoffs with that group.  Marrone was one game shy of doing it with garbage at QB. (same record as McD just not the same Bengals luck) Allen makes that one game difference IMO.

 

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheFunPolice said:

I understand the sentiment about McDermott being a good person.

 

One has to wonder why so many people would be looking to hurt him and his reputation, that being the case. I mentioned it earlier in the thread, but Frank Reich was a walking disaster in Indy. Nobody listened to him or respected him as HC. It was like there was a substitute teacher there. He had to go.

 

But Reich the human? You don't see guys eager to line up and take shots, even though it was a mess. He tried, he just wasn't good at the job. That's no reason to tear the guy apart. 

 

That's why you don't see these long stories about other coaches. This isn't normal. 

 

So why McDermott? 

Ask Doug Whaley, maybe he can tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DC Greg said:

 

Yeah, but those are coaching legends who don't crap their pants when the game is on the line and have 12 men on the field, call timeouts that help the other team, throw dumb challenge flags, have the defense out of position and generally unprepared, have the offense take a knee, and everything else that McDermott does to lose games. I could care less about this hit piece and whatever aspects of his personality are being discussed here.

 

I don't care if he's a jerk or a saint, I care if he can coach. And at this point, he has proven THAT HE CANNOT. He is SINGLEHANDEDLY losing this team games with his cowardly, deer-in-headlights coaching in any tight game. Enough is enough. That's why he needs fired, not because of any of this crap. It's remarkable how obviously bad he is whenever the game is on the line. He's the anti-clutch and everyone knows it. Dump this hack already.

Except you forget according to McD it's all the offenses fault.🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Paul Costa said:

What coaches or players said McDermott blamed the offense? I didn’t see any name’s attached to said events. Did you? Not saying it’s not true but there’s zero proof that it is true. 

I don't like Tyler Dunne either but I'm going to doubt that he's just making stuff up.  It's in line with what we know about regarding his views on complementary football as well. 

Edited by Bruffalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

my grain of salt is Bill B comes across as a narcissistic control freak too as did Parcels. Polian was widely reported to be a complete ahole. I think to be an nfl coach some of these personality defects are a feature not a bug. 

 

Anyone want to bet against the chance that Josh McDaniel is a narcissistic control freak?  
 

"Narcissist" is a term with a specific psychological meaning that gets thrown around far too widely these days, but to the fundamental point - I think you're exactly correct.  Football HC have to be dialed in and focused.  The buck stops with them, so yes they want control.  Who was Sean McDermott's coaching mentor?  Want to bet Andy Reid isn't a demanding control freak?

 

That said:

 

A lot of coaches come in to a team and the team (if it's average) sustains that level or improves the coach's first or second year.  They're novel, players want to win, the coaches get the benefit of the doubt ("buy in").  Then the "honeymoon" wears off and the team slumps.  Gase got Miami to 10-6 his first season, playoff game, whoo hoo they're on their way.  Flores 10-6 the team's second season, likewise whoo hoo. 

 

So the difference is, can the team sustain success and build?  And McDermott, whatever he is to work for or play for, has managed that for the Bills. 

I've said it before, I'll say it again, I don't find it difficult to believe that McDermott is a control freak who wants it 'his way or the highway' and who has definite ideas about how things should be done, and definite expectations of being 'heard and obeyed' when he says something.

 

On the other hand....I find it very difficult to believe that he could sustain success with the Bills for 7 years if it's true that "He has zero relationship with the offensive players. Zero. None. Absolutely zero" and "He wants the relationship that he can’t have with the players. Because he’s not physically, mentally, or socially able to". 

 

Because coaching professional sports now a days is very much about building and managing relationships with the players.  So is McDermott the Dale Carnegie Award Winning Self-Aware COTY, maybe not, but there's a lot of room between that and "not physically mentally or socially able to" have relationships with the players and just pooping on his assistants.

 

I could see big development in Brian Daboll from his first year with the team to his fourth, from being a stiff-faced guy who flirted with throwing his players under the bus in pressers, to being an affable guy who expressed concern for both players and reporters.  Usually (not always) people develop in their job because it's asked or even demanded of them to change.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eme123 said:

At the end of the day 25 former players, coaches, and staff decided to give their two cents on what an aweful person mcdermott is. What is really amazing is not one of these 25 people was willing to offer their name with their thoughts. 

 2 did, but they clearly admired McDermott.  It’s the Feliciano, Beasley, Quinton Spain, Levi Wallace, Hughes’s of the world who don’t have the guts to put names to their bitching.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Paul Costa said:

What coaches or players said McDermott blamed the offense? I didn’t see any name’s attached to said events. Did you? Not saying it’s not true but there’s zero proof that it is true. 

He's inferred it numerous times this year, while heaping praise on his defense.  Where have you been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...