Jump to content

"The Best NFL Offense that Can't Score Points" - Video Breakdown


BigDingus

Recommended Posts

 

Just for those who are interested. Crazy to see how the Bills are ranked so highly in many offensive metrics, yet still so low in PPG the last 5 weeks.

 

Edit - 6:36 in the video is where it gets interesting, breaking down how EPA is the PROBABILITY of scoring points (which the Bills are ranked #2 in), and how the Bills are "the best team in the league at taking a theoretically strong field position after a big play, and totally squandering it."

Edited by BigDingus
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@FireChans

the thing to remember about EPA is it's a model and not necessarily an indicator

 

I will say that models built around EPA like nflELO and similar others show remarkable accuracy in predicting say NFL spreads more accurately than standard price discover...like the majority of models (and this real life example of offense performance vs expected performance) it performs better in regression analysis

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

5th in offensive points scored and 18th in total points is the takeaway

 

Bass w the entirety of his misses in the last 5games contributes I would imagine

 

 


I doubt the three field goals he missed is contributing much to this.  He’s been 3-6 in those games, NFL average can’t be better than 83%, so missing 1 out of the six is at least expected, without even accounting for distance, field conditions, etc.  So at worst, he’s missed two more than expected, aka 6 points.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said:


I doubt the three field goals he missed is contributing much to this.  He’s been 3-6 in those games, NFL average can’t be better than 83%, so missing 1 out of the six is at least expected, without even accounting for distance, field conditions, etc.  So at worst, he’s missed two more than expected, aka 6 points.

Could be but >1ppg is going to probably be significant I think

 

I do not imagine his attempts contributed much to EPA being two of his missed from 50+ yards 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can boil it down to three issues:

 

* An over reliance on shotgun

* A lack of a run game out of shotgun primarily due to vanilla scheme

* An over reliance on big plays to dig out of holes and then stalling out due to no run game.

 

To me the net of this is that Dorsey is way too enamored with Josh’s arm.  This then spills over to the rest of the offense that believes too much in Josh’s arm.

 

I have solidly joined the camp that says Dorsey is the problem (the film does not lie).  The Bills run scheme is pop warner and it is causing them to waste Josh’s talent.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

Boy this guy's analysis makes one wonder what the heck our is OC doing.

For me the non-analytic part of it is least interesting tbh

 

He is seemingly unaware of our actual offensive line quality re physical ability and misdiagnoses a bunch of our run game concepts

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

For me the non-analytic part of it is least interesting tbh

 

He is seemingly unaware of our actual offensive line quality re physical ability and misdiagnoses a bunch of our run game concepts

The Bills’ o-line talent isn’t that bad and is in all likelihood better than average at the moment. They have no injuries, and lines across the league are in way worse shape because of injuries/mediocrity. 

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stats shown at the beginning are an indicator of bad defense and special teams. Like 5th best in TDs per drive since week 5, but only 18th in total points over that time span, that is clearly a time of possession stat. As Brett Kollmann points out, field position is another huge issue. Our offense has a middling run game and only one elite pass catcher, and it's being asked to execute perfectly on long drives with very few opportunities for explosive plays. That is not a recipe for success.

 

Good analysis of the run game schematic issues too. @HoofHearted pointed out that 2 of our 8 called runs versus Cincy featured a schematic flaw that literally drew the defender to the spot where they made the tackle.

 

And unfortunately I don't think the myriad of factors causing these issues are fixable at this point in the season. Pretty much our only chance of sustained success against decent teams right now is everyone on offense executing perfectly throughout the game, and that is just not a realistic ask.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

For me the non-analytic part of it is least interesting tbh

 

He is seemingly unaware of our actual offensive line quality re physical ability and misdiagnoses a bunch of our run game concepts

 

I'm not sure there's been a more obnoxious whiner of the OL quality than me the last several years, but I don't think that has much impact on his points.

 

Good offenses (and good coordinators) will try & shore up those weaknesses with schemes & creative play designs. The Bills don't. Like he said, they run 2 basic concepts, essentially expecting to fail. 

 

Because they want shotgun to be their identity, they refuse to call formations that they actually have success running out of...  As he said, they base their ENTIRE run game on the 2 "least explosive" concepts imaginable (inside zone & duo), and even then, they run them in the most predictable & least creative ways imaginable ("straight downhill, into the jaws of hell" as he put it). 

 

Even if your OL talent stinks, you are deliberately handicapping yourself even further by doing this. Other teams that run out of shotgun don't do this, but we do. All these problems lead to the other big issue he discusses, where the Bills are now a "TD or nothing" team.

 

They're ranked 6th in drives ending in a TD, but ranked 31st in drives that result in a FG... only attempting 6 FGs the last 5 games, and only making 3... THREE! We don't even try to be creative with running, refuse to run outside of shotgun, and then just exclusively throw when we get to the 50 - opponent's 30 yard line.

 

If it was just OL talent, the Bills wouldn't have the 3rd highest yards per carry in the NFL when running from under center. They just CHOOSE not to.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is awesome thanks. My favorite part was the explanation of EPA as I’ve heard it used but wanted more context for how it relates.

 

Again, this further validates what I’ve been saying about the run game. We’ve been so used to seeing Allen march up and down the field slinging the rock that when we run the ball for zero yards we say run less, pass more. 
 

In reality we’re seeing plenty of pass attempts to damage to our offenses overall success. The bills must find a way to run the ball for positive gains when they need to, and not rely solely on the passing game to get it done.

 

21 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said:

You can boil it down to three issues:

 

* An over reliance on shotgun

* A lack of a run game out of shotgun primarily due to vanilla scheme

* An over reliance on big plays to dig out of holes and then stalling out due to no run game.

 

To me the net of this is that Dorsey is way too enamored with Josh’s arm.  This then spills over to the rest of the offense that believes too much in Josh’s arm.

 

I have solidly joined the camp that says Dorsey is the problem (the film does not lie).  The Bills run scheme is pop warner and it is causing them to waste Josh’s talent.


As much as i love from playing under center, I don’t think your first point is as much of an issue as the second.

 

Running from the gun can be dangerous. But we’ve entirely remove Allen as a threat to keep the ball in zone reads, RPOs, QB power etc.

 

This in effects adds a defender to the mix when we do run the ball. A simple fix is to continue to do what they want, and have Allen keep the ball, or AT LEAST carry out a full speed fake. 
 

If they want to keep their current schemes, so be it. But as @HappyDays  mentioned and @HoofHearted suggested, small tweaks to motions, splits and the details within the run game could be enough to take what they’re doing and make it serviceable. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigDingus said:

 

I'm not sure there's been a more obnoxious whiner of the OL quality than me the last several years, but I don't think that has much impact on his points.

 

Good offenses (and good coordinators) will try & shore up those weaknesses with schemes & creative play designs. The Bills don't. Like he said, they run 2 basic concepts, essentially expecting to fail. 

 

Because they want shotgun to be their identity, they refuse to call formations that they actually have success running out of...  As he said, they base their ENTIRE run game on the 2 "least explosive" concepts imaginable (inside zone & duo), and even then, they run them in the most predictable & least creative ways imaginable ("straight downhill, into the jaws of hell" as he put it). 

 

Even if your OL talent stinks, you are deliberately handicapping yourself even further by doing this. Other teams that run out of shotgun don't do this, but we do. All these problems lead to the other big issue he discusses, where the Bills are now a "TD or nothing" team.

 

They're ranked 6th in drives ending in a TD, but ranked 31st in drives that result in a FG... only attempting 6 FGs the last 5 games, and only making 3... THREE! We don't even try to be creative with running, refuse to run outside of shotgun, and then just exclusively throw when we get to the 50 - opponent's 30 yard line.

 

If it was just OL talent, the Bills wouldn't have the 3rd highest yards per carry in the NFL when running from under center. They just CHOOSE not to.

I think thats definitely part of it

 

Our guys don't rank very well in terms of yards before contact which is why there's some disagreement wrt oline quality

 

The actual reasons are probably beyond my expertise😂😂

22 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bills’ o-line talent isn’t that bad and is in all likelihood better than average at the moment. They have no injuries, and lines across the league are in way worse shape because of injuries/mediocrity. 

Have to agree to disagree there

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...