Jump to content

Family Values


SectionC3

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Obviously Corey has, umm, something that is not immediately evident to the casual observer.

He was previously doing Hope Hicks, Trump's old communications staffer, famously described by Trump as "the best piece of tail" Corey would ever have.

Noem was considered VP material. This will be interesting. In a conservative (values wise) state like South Dakota, does a married woman having an affair mean anything to the base anymore? How about nationally?

"One man, one woman, one life" is what the religious right used to say ...

Meanwhile, a few hundred miles southwest, another family values Trumpist who abandoned her husband is whooping it up big time in the big city with a new companion. Remaining on-brand, she was, of course, vaping in the theater.

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/28/lewandowski-cuts-deal-sexual-charges-00059269Complete POS! 

 

Former senior Donald Trump adviser Corey Lewandowski has cut a deal with Las Vegas prosecutors after he was charged with misdemeanor battery, stemming from allegations of unwanted sexual advances toward a woman during a charity dinner in Sept. 2021.

The charge came nearly a year after Trashelle Odom accused Lewandowski of repeatedly touching her, including on her leg and buttocks, and speaking to her in sexually graphic terms. POLITICO reported that Odom, the wife of Idaho construction executive and major GOP donor John Odom, also alleged that Lewandowski “stalked” her throughout the hotel where the event took place, told her she had a “nice ass,” and threw a drink at her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Doc said:

See: Slick Willy.  The left has NO leg to stand on here.

Now that you mention it, something that happened about 25 years ago definitely prevents anyone from thinking that Lewandowski and, in particular, Noem are hypocrites. 

 

Hoax.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And whatever Bill Clinton did, I think the interesting thing here is this: in today's Trumpist Republican Party, is this even a disqualification for serving as VP?

Back in the highly entertaining Tucker Carlson thread, someone posted his Twitter show about the decline of traditional morality. What old Sen Moynihan called "defining deviancy down." Presumably Tucker thinks traditional values are important.

We know that doing an "adult film actress" sex worker is no longer a disqualifier, even when that happens right after your latest wife gave birth to your youngest son. 

How about a woman married for 30 years carrying on a years-long affair with a married man?

I suspect the new Republican Party doesn't care.

But if she had expressed support for a family member who is trans, that's it. They'd be done with her.

Interesting times in the Grand Old Party.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

And whatever Bill Clinton did, I think the interesting thing here is this: in today's Trumpist Republican Party, is this even a disqualification for serving as VP?

Back in the highly entertaining Tucker Carlson thread, someone posted his Twitter show about the decline of traditional morality. What old Sen Moynihan called "defining deviancy down." Presumably Tucker thinks traditional values are important.

We know that doing an "adult film actress" sex worker is no longer a disqualifier, even when that happens right after your latest wife gave birth to your youngest son. 

How about a woman married for 30 years carrying on a years-long affair with a married man?

I suspect the new Republican Party doesn't care.

But if she had expressed support for a family member who is trans, that's it. They'd be done with her.

Interesting times in the Grand Old Party.

Most suspect it's the usual DEM hit pieces devoid of facts. 

 

that last part is just off.  showing your biases more than anything. while trying to demonize using a coo coo strawman.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris farley said:

Most suspect it's the usual DEM hit pieces devoid of facts. 

 

that last part is just off.  showing your biases more than anything. while trying to demonize using a coo coo strawman.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

She didn't deny it. Just issued some lukewarm statement like yours - ooh, funny that this comes out just as she (continues to) support Trump's candidacy ...

It's real all right.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

She didn't deny it. Just issued some lukewarm statement like yours - ooh, funny that this comes out just as she (continues to) support Trump's candidacy ...

It's real all right.

reads like more media and dems trying to create a story to use massive hypocritical faux outrage on.

 

like usual

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

reads like more media and dems trying to create a story to use massive hypocritical faux outrage on.

 

like usual

 

 

Hoax.  I’m not outraged.  Amused by what appears to be the hypocrisy, yes, but not outraged in the least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

She didn't deny it. Just issued some lukewarm statement like yours - ooh, funny that this comes out just as she (continues to) support Trump's candidacy ...

It's real all right.

Hey remember when that DeSantis debate memo leaked, and you assured me multiple times it was real, even calling me naive for saying it was most likely fake, and then DeSantis followed exactly zero of the talking points? Maybe your ability to discern real vs fake is not the most highly attuned. Secondly to say the evidence presented so far is anything about National Enquirer is inaccurate, It is like pretending me hanging out with female teachers from other schools would be questionable without any further information. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Now that you mention it, something that happened about 25 years ago definitely prevents anyone from thinking that Lewandowski and, in particular, Noem are hypocrites. 

 

Hoax.  

 

Congrats, you're both hypocrites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...