Jump to content

Which off season QB contract will look the worst by the end of this season?


Mr. WEO

Which off season QB contract will look the worst by the end of this season?  

243 members have voted

  1. 1. Which off season QB contract will look the worst by the end of this season?

    • Aaron Rodgers; Jets owe him $107 million over next 2 years
      70
    • Lamar Jackson: $260 mil/5 years, $52 per
      61
    • Daniel Jones: $160/4 years
      74
    • Derek Carr: $150/4 years
      38


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, arcane said:

Rodgers, his decline was not an aberration and will only accelerate 

 

I hope you are right obviously, but I have a feeling the Jets are going to be good this year. Those 2 games against them are going to be hard fought games just like last year.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted "Jones" simply b/c that's a lot of money and I don't think he's particularly good.

 

Honorable mention goes to Carr, who has greatness in him, but it just doesn't come out enough with consistency.  And he can be really lousy too!

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gregg said:

 

I hope you are right obviously, but I have a feeling the Jets are going to be good this year. Those 2 games against them are going to be hard fought games just like last year.

I still think the Jets can be good in this scenario, because their QBs were worse than the level to which I imagine Rodgers falling this year. But the man is being put in everyone's top 5 QB lists and I wouldn't be surprised if he finishes the year outside of most people's top 20

 

And I do think the Jets were right to go for it. I just think that the ball I saw from Rodgers last year wasn't because his weapons or line sucked (and his line is not getting any better in NJ)

Edited by arcane
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danny Dimes. How he got that contract after tossing 15 TDs last year is beyond me. 

 

I get the Rodgers contract. Gives them a shot at something. Called going "all in".

 

Carr, I think will do ok in NO. He'll be overall mediocre IMO but he's still cheaper than Jones somehow.

 

Lamar will Lamar. That's a ton of money but if he stays healthy he could have them contending for their division. 

 

But the Giants with or without Barkley were poised for a drop this year. They had a cake schedule (of which they didn't look dominating against bad teams. Barely squeezed by) and curiously didn't add much to that offense aside from a broken down TE. I see them as a 6-11 squad this year that's vastly overpaying a sub par QB...and that's not where you want to be. Rooting for Daboll but I just don't see it.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted Lamar as he'll be in a new offense that may require him to stay in the pocket more which could make him more susceptible to injury since defenses will play to hit him vs keep him in front of them which does not play to his strengths.  Also I can't see OBJ being happy playing second fiddle to a TE like Mark Andrews. 

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

place your bets

I think they all have potential to look REALLY bad, but I think Jones has the potential to be the least crippling because they can get out the year after next, and their roster is so bad that one more year at his price tag won’t be as prohibitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Jones isn't good. It is what it is. He was due a contract and it was either pay him or rebuild.

 

Lamar is 1 injury away from being Teddy Bridgewater. He's good because he can run but once he can't anymore he will just be a below average passer. It's only a matter of time.

 

Rodgers will implode if the Jets aren't good. Their OL isn't great, it could go very poorly.

 

Carr will probably be the best of the bunch. He's above average and that division is garbage. 9 wins could get them into the playoffs which is good enough for that team to stay happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FireChans said:

I think they all have potential to look REALLY bad, but I think Jones has the potential to be the least crippling because they can get out the year after next, and their roster is so bad that one more year at his price tag won’t be as prohibitive.

 

120 million for 45 TDs tho....

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

120 million for 45 TDs tho....

Nah, they cut him after 2025 and he's only getting $81M total for 2 years.

 

If he puts up 22-25 TD's per season over the next two years, that's a little less than $2M a TD.

Edited by FireChans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dpberr said:

Lamar Jackson.  Chronic health issues and a fragile knee that likely isn't right.  He's a black box of medical issues. 

 

Why Baltimore did that deal, I'll never understand.  

Because he won a MVP and wins 70% of his starts. 
 

and Jones averages 15 td passes and 9 ints. It’s a joke he makes that much. At least Carr has put up good numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Because he won a MVP and wins 70% of his starts. 
 

and Jones averages 15 td passes and 9 ints. It’s a joke he makes that much. At least Carr has put up good numbers. 

 

Jones was the biggest overpay on talent. But if Rodgers ends up costing the Jets $60m in dead money in retirement in 2024 then that is the worse deal unless he has at the very least got them to the Superbowl in 2023.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...