Homey D. Clown Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slippery Rubber Mats Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 1 minute ago, Homey D. Clown said: I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. Rebuttal: we're left with 40 billion in dead cap after the trade 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjt328 Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Every time Brandon Beane talked this offseason, he mentioned getting the offense MORE weapons. He was limited in cap space and there weren't a bunch of options, but he still signed two free agent receivers (Trent Sherfield and Deonte Harty). We know he explored signing Odell Beckham and acquiring DeAndre Hopkins. In the draft, he ended up getting the best receiving Tight End (Dalton Kincaid) and adding another receiver (Justin Shorter). Everyone knows the Bills are inside a rapidly closing Super Bowl window. Everyone in the organization has acknowledged that. There isn't a single example in the last 2-3 seasons of us doing anything that could possibly be viewed as a rebuild or reset. Beane's moves have all been about trying to win a championship right now, with a little bit of care to not totally mortgaging the future. The idea he would trade away Stefon Diggs is laughable. Not only because it would completely blow-up our Super Bowl aspirations, but because it would also cause dead-cap problems. It would pretty much be the opposite strategy of every move Beane has made recently. Regardless of whether Diggs is causing issues internally (which is entirely possible), the Bills know they NEED him badly and couldn't realistically move on financially if they wanted to. I absolutely believe more is going on with Diggs than our front office is currently admitting. It could stem from a multitude of issues, up to and including anger with the coaching staff, gameplan, team acquisitions, or personal beef with other players. All of these possibilities are on the table. But nobody outside of a select few people on this planet know the truth, and the Bills are notoriously tight-lipped with allowing leaks. The media is desperate to milk this story during the NFL's slowest time of year, but they can't get anything concrete. So as usual, they are just running with rumors from anonymous sources. It's pathetic. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said: I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. Rebuttal: We have no idea what Diggs, Allen et al are thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homey D. Clown Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Tom Donahoe, GM said: Rebuttal: we're left with 40 billion in dead cap after the trade I should have put "miracle deal" in bold 3 minutes ago, Max Fischer said: Rebuttal: We have no idea what Diggs, Allen et al are thinking. I should have put "intelligent rebuttal" in bold seriously though, I think the outward display of adult infancy speaks for itself. Edited June 23, 2023 by Homey D. Clown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 3 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said: I should have put "miracle deal" in bold I should have put "intelligent rebuttal" in bold Everything you wrote is speculation based on speculation. It's your "feelings" - nothing is based on fact. Please provide evidence that Diggs "clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong" or "Now Allen has to force throws his way." Or perhaps you are privy to conversations that Bills reporters have not heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Let’s do a thread about how McBean is actually considering packaging JA w Diggs for some draft picks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 8 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Let’s do a thread about how McBean is actually considering packaging JA w Diggs for some draft picks. Only if we bring Tyrod back :eye roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 51 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said: I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. I think it is quite overblown and that Diggs has consistently proven when it comes to game time he plays. This is honestly the fanbase just looking for conflict and it is spurred on by the media who knows fans even outside of the Bills fandom will eat it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slippery Rubber Mats Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 49 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said: I should have put "miracle deal" in bold wtf does that mean lol? If we trade him, we get a massive dead cap penalty. There is no way around it. My guy get off your high horse 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 How is anything on this even being debated still when Albright immediately said this was all made up opinion in response to a hypothetical question? Some fans really got a hard on for hating one of our best players, eh? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Josh Allen has green diarrhea from having ranch with his chicken wings. 150-page thread upcoming... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 58 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said: I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. Rebuttal: Homey D Clown was always a hater back in the day. Nothings changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 11 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: How is anything on this even being debated still when Albright immediately said this was all made up opinion in response to a hypothetical question? Some fans really got a hard on for hating one of our best players, eh? Because a made up lie travels about 10,000 times faster and to millions more people than the truth can follow. I think there has been studies done that when a blatant lie or speculation is started it reaches far more people than the retraction or correction ever will. It probably has something to do with the lie or speculation being more inflammatory than the truth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Personally... I think Diggs has a legitimate gripe. He wasn't invited to the room and what we were trying to do against the Benfgals wasn't working. They gave Allen lots of input about stuff (Dorsey Hire for example) but nothing from a All Pro possible future HoF WR is a pass heavy offense I wish it was handled better but I can't be too upset with Diggs either at this junction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 25 minutes ago, What a Tuel said: Because a made up lie travels about 10,000 times faster and to millions more people than the truth can follow. I think there has been studies done that when a blatant lie or speculation is started it reaches far more people than the retraction or correction ever will. It probably has something to do with the lie or speculation being more inflammatory than the truth. And then you have Brandolini's Law at play as well. Brandolini's law, also known as the bullsh!t asymmetry principle, is an internet adage coined in 2013 that emphasizes the effort of debunking misinformation, in comparison to the relative ease of creating it in the first place. The law states the following: The amount of energy needed to refute bullsh!t is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 44 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: How is anything on this even being debated still when Albright immediately said this was all made up opinion in response to a hypothetical question? Some fans really got a hard on for hating one of our best players, eh? Lol I just was jumping in to post this. I also find it hilarious that someone in this thread called him. LaCanfora clone. Whoever said that should never be taken seriously on this board... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikePJ76 Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Diggs d0ing what he did 0pens the d00r t0 all this n0nsense. This stuff will c0ntinue until camps start and s0me new st0ry gains m0re attenti0n am0ng the lazy nati0nal writers and talk sh0w h0sts. S0me0ne is b0und t0 beat their wife and kids, slap a stripper ar0und 0r s0mething these guys are always d0ing that will grab s0me 0f the attenti0n away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niagara Bill Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 1 hour ago, Homey D. Clown said: I would be in favor of this "Bellichick style" move, especially if this team wants to keep their superbowl window open. I personally don't think what Diggs did and is clearly still doing is/was justified in any way, and I can't see how a team can thrive with a player that clearly thinks his QB is doing him wrong, or another "mystery" person in the organization. Now Allen has to force throws his way, people have to cater to his bull#### tantrum, or placate his ego. It's like a married couple where someone has cheated, but they stay married. Yes they stayed married and faithful, but it's never the same. Add the fact Diggs is going to be 30, I say work a miracle deal to let him "antonio brown" himself out of the league somewhere else. I welcome intelligent rebuttal. If his ego becomes Antonio Brownesq, he either has to leave, or Dawkins, Morris, Knox has to step in defend the O or beat crap out of him. His disruptions cannot be tolerated by the players, they have more influence than coaches. It happened many times on bickering Bills days. Where is Carwell when you need him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 19 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: And then you have Brandolini's Law at play as well. Brandolini's law, also known as the bullsh!t asymmetry principle, is an internet adage coined in 2013 that emphasizes the effort of debunking misinformation, in comparison to the relative ease of creating it in the first place. The law states the following: The amount of energy needed to refute bullsh!t is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it I know I’ve heard that before. I just can’t remember if it was in Physics or Philosophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts