Jump to content

Prayer service planned for Kim Pegula


BillsFan619

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, KzooMike said:

Does Kim belong to this church?

 

Unlikely. From what I could find:

 

https://buffalonews.com/buffalo-magazine/the-billionaire-next-door/article_a48f64ac-0e96-5d1b-8f6d-1cf9e7007f47.html

[paywall, and my free views are up]

 

"The billionaire next door

 

May 1, 2015 — Terry was raised Catholic. Kim points to that as something that keeps them grounded."

 

That's why I said earlier it seemed tacky, since this move doesn't appear to have Terry's or Kim's blessing. It's like the church wants to benefit from this in some way.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chongli said:

 

Unlikely. From what I could find:

 

https://buffalonews.com/buffalo-magazine/the-billionaire-next-door/article_a48f64ac-0e96-5d1b-8f6d-1cf9e7007f47.html

[paywall, and my free views are up]

 

"The billionaire next door

 

May 1, 2015 — Terry was raised Catholic. Kim points to that as something that keeps them grounded."

 

That's why I said earlier it seemed tacky, since this move doesn't appear to have Terry's or Kim's blessing. It's like the church wants to benefit from this in some way.

I’m not sure where this ‘take’ is coming from. Out of curiosity, I went on the church’s website and found there is ZERO charge for tickets to the event. They appear to simply want people to gather to pray for Mrs Pegula and want to make sure the crowd doesn’t overflow the building. I see nothing wrong with that. Do you know something else? 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’m not sure where this ‘take’ is coming from. Out of curiosity, I went on the church’s website and found there is ZERO charge for tickets to the event. They appear to simply want people to gather to pray for Mrs Pegula and want to make sure the crowd doesn’t overflow the building. I see nothing wrong with that. Do you know something else? 

 

There is no charge, but this will surely attract a lot of publicity and probably more donations to the church while making the church look good (to some at least). They are a big church and staff and seem to want to grow rapidly from their website. They have lots of expenses given their online presence. Their motives are questionable. It's something I would stay away from.

 

It's tacky since you just don't do something like this when the family has been mostly silent about this issue and seem to want people respect their privacy. (Sure, Jessica spoke a little, but the family had to eventually say something.) If the Pegulas did want to do something like this, you think there would be an announcement from them, with a non-denominational whatever. It's like the church is profiting from someone else's tragedy.

 

It's just something I wouldn't do absent the Pegulas official blessing. It's a bad look.

Edited by chongli
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chongli said:

 

There is no charge, but this will surely attract a lot of publicity and probably more donations to the church while making the church look good (to some at least). They are a big church and staff and seem to want to grow rapidly from their website. They have lots of expenses given their online presence. Their motives are questionable. It's something I would stay away from.

 

It's tacky since you just don't do something like this when the family has been mostly silent about this issue and seem to want people respect their privacy. (Sure, Jessica spoke a little, but the family had to eventually say something.) If the Pegulas did want to do something like this, you think there would be an announcement from them, with a non-denominational whatever. It's like the church is profiting from someone else's tragedy.

 

It's just something I wouldn't do absent the Pegula's official blessing. It's a bad look.

The article did say that there’d be a message from the Pegulas at the prayer service so it’d seem like the church has their blessing to do the service.

 

@SoCal Deek

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BillsFan619 said:

The article did say that there’d be a message from the Pegulas at the prayer service so it’d seem like the church has their blessing to do the service.

 

@SoCal Deek

 

Ok, I misread the article thinking it said a message will be shared to the Pegula family. If they indeed have sanctioned this, then ok, I guess. But I guess I'd like to know what the message is, and if they really did approve or felt the need to say yes. [Kind of like when I was volunteering and mentioned a health issue with to a woman who was a member of this church, and she all of the sudden grabbed my hand and did a vocal prayer. I thanked her, knowing she meant well, but still.]

 

IDK, maybe it's just me, but something still seems weird about this. Just respect their privacy. They apparently (??) approached the Pegulas, not the other way around. Why were they looking for this opportunity?

Edited by chongli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, chongli said:

 

Ok, I misread the article thinking it said a message will be shared to the Pegula family. If they indeed have sanctioned this, then ok, I guess. But I guess I'd like to know what the message is, and if they really did approve or felt the need to say yes. [Kind of like when I was volunteering and mentioned a health issue with to a woman who was a member of this church, and she all of the sudden grabbed my hand and did a vocal prayer. I thanked her, knowing she meant well, but still.]

 

IDK, maybe it's just me, but something still seems weird about this. Just respect their privacy. They apparently (??) approached the Pegulas, not the other way around. Why were they looking for this opportunity?

It’s now ‘weird’ for people to gather in prayer for a public figure who is ill? No offense, but I hope I never get to the point where I either assume or feel that way. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2023 at 4:34 PM, DrDawkinstein said:

 

More likely there is a new project that popped up, like needing some roof and steeple repairs, and this is just fund raising by the church to pad their coffers while attendance is declining.

 

On 4/14/2023 at 10:13 PM, chongli said:

 

What they are doing seems tacky.

 

12 hours ago, chongli said:

 

There is no charge, but this will surely attract a lot of publicity and probably more donations to the church while making the church look good (to some at least). They are a big church and staff and seem to want to grow rapidly from their website. They have lots of expenses given their online presence. Their motives are questionable. It's something I would stay away from.

 

It's tacky since you just don't do something like this when the family has been mostly silent about this issue and seem to want people respect their privacy. (Sure, Jessica spoke a little, but the family had to eventually say something.) If the Pegulas did want to do something like this, you think there would be an announcement from them, with a non-denominational whatever. It's like the church is profiting from someone else's tragedy.

 

It's just something I wouldn't do absent the Pegulas official blessing. It's a bad look.

 

I understand the skepticism, because of all the stories there have been about mega-churches misappropriating funds and pastors of mega-churches misbehaving (and misappropriating funds).  We have our own family stuff against "prosperity gospel" here.

 

But of all the things in the world to be critical of or concerned about, a church holding a prayer service lifting up someone who's injured or ill seems low on the list.

 

It says they're sharing a message from the Pegulas, so there must be some kind of Pegula family approval.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, chongli said:

 

Ok, I misread the article thinking it said a message will be shared to the Pegula family. If they indeed have sanctioned this, then ok, I guess. But I guess I'd like to know what the message is, and if they really did approve or felt the need to say yes. [Kind of like when I was volunteering and mentioned a health issue with to a woman who was a member of this church, and she all of the sudden grabbed my hand and did a vocal prayer. I thanked her, knowing she meant well, but still.]

 

IDK, maybe it's just me, but something still seems weird about this. Just respect their privacy. They apparently (??) approached the Pegulas, not the other way around. Why were they looking for this opportunity?


Going off off of @Draconator and his post about the church building a subdivision.  In 2023, anytime a church physically builds a residence/community around it in an affluent area of town, while skimming off of the top, we should all be skeptical of all of their events. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

It’s now ‘weird’ for people to gather in prayer for a public figure who is ill? No offense, but I hope I never get to the point where I either assume or feel that way. 

 

I personally would choose just to respect their privacy, but it's fine you and others feel differently. It's just me.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chongli said:

 

I personally would choose just to respect their privacy, but it's fine you and others feel differently. It's just me.

The thing is that people have feelings about people like the Pegulas, and they need to do something.   It's not about giving something to the Pegs or violating their privacy; it's about satisfying the needs of others to do something to help themselves feel better. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

 

 

I understand the skepticism, because of all the stories there have been about mega-churches misappropriating funds and pastors of mega-churches misbehaving (and misappropriating funds).  We have our own family stuff against "prosperity gospel" here.

 

But of all the things in the world to be critical of or concerned about, a church holding a prayer service lifting up someone who's injured or ill seems low on the list.

 

It says they're sharing a message from the Pegulas, so there must be some kind of Pegula family approval.

I think for some people the thought of a church using it's forum or somebody like Kim who has been through hell,  as means to possibly increase publicity or branding is about as low as it gets. It's so low that even the faint risk of the intent not being pure is enough to draw a strong reaction. A lot of us don't exactly trust churches to not be this way. Perhaps the church called them and said we would like to do a prayer service for you, do you have anything you would like to say during the service? I doubt it could have been more than that. If you don't want to be skeptical about the intent that's up to you. As some have said, it seems a bit weird. If she was a member at that church it wouldn't seem weird at all. If that seems weird to you so be it.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, chongli said:

 

Ok, I misread the article thinking it said a message will be shared to the Pegula family. If they indeed have sanctioned this, then ok, I guess. 

You guess?  Would it have been better if Terry reached out to you for prior approval?

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, chongli said:

 

There is no charge, but this will surely attract a lot of publicity and probably more donations to the church while making the church look good (to some at least). They are a big church and staff and seem to want to grow rapidly from their website. They have lots of expenses given their online presence. Their motives are questionable. It's something I would stay away from.

 

It's tacky since you just don't do something like this when the family has been mostly silent about this issue and seem to want people respect their privacy. (Sure, Jessica spoke a little, but the family had to eventually say something.) If the Pegulas did want to do something like this, you think there would be an announcement from them, with a non-denominational whatever. It's like the church is profiting from someone else's tragedy.

 

It's just something I wouldn't do absent the Pegulas official blessing. It's a bad look.

You absolutely don't organize a prayer service without the blessing of the family.  Rule #1.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jessie pegula's message to the players tribune was lengthy and heartfelt. it's obvious kim is not doing well and has a difficult road to recovery.

 

a prayer service at any house of worship can bring comfort to friends and family...ive been to many denominatations...they all take up a collection and encourage donations.....nobody is forcing anybody to give anything.

 

why anyone would find something negative in any of this is beyond me

 

 

Edited by papazoid
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/15/2023 at 10:53 PM, chongli said:

 

Unlikely. From what I could find:

 

https://buffalonews.com/buffalo-magazine/the-billionaire-next-door/article_a48f64ac-0e96-5d1b-8f6d-1cf9e7007f47.html

[paywall, and my free views are up]

 

"The billionaire next door

 

May 1, 2015 — Terry was raised Catholic. Kim points to that as something that keeps them grounded."

 

That's why I said earlier it seemed tacky, since this move doesn't appear to have Terry's or Kim's blessing. It's like the church wants to benefit from this in some way.

Why does support have to only come from their church? I am pretty sure her impact goes well beyond that as many have explained. People still believe in prayer.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...