Warcodered Posted April 5, 2023 Share Posted April 5, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: You are playing a bizarre semantic game here. Let’s say OJ needs money (again). Let’s say someone pays him $10 million and he gives a detailed interview about exactly how he killed Ron and Nicole. I think 99.99% of us would say “he committed a horrific crime” notwithstanding the fact that he was acquitted by a jury and can never again be put on trial for that. Didn't he sell a book, or try to sell a book about it, I think the proceeds ended up going to the families since he lost the civil suit. Edited April 5, 2023 by Warcodered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted April 5, 2023 Share Posted April 5, 2023 12 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: The amount of such women “ protesting” the SC decision on abortion in BUF was incredible. It was if they had no idea that they were in NY - where abortion is guaranteed and always will be. You mean I misunderstood the many Republicans who now say they are advocating for a nationwide federal abortion ban? Maybe if they’d stick to their old line - “but it’s an issue for the people of each state to decide!” - you’d have a point. But it turns out that whole states rights thing was bs, no? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted April 5, 2023 Share Posted April 5, 2023 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: You mean I misunderstood the many Republicans who now say they are advocating for a nationwide federal abortion ban? Maybe if they’d stick to their old line - “but it’s an issue for the people of each state to decide!” - you’d have a point. But it turns out that whole states rights thing was bs, no? No, not BS. There are a some who want to try for such a ban, but it’s misguided ( imo) and has little chance of amounting to anything. It’s a States issue as far as I’m concerned. There are always a few at the fringes of these issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted April 5, 2023 Share Posted April 5, 2023 7 hours ago, SUNY_amherst said: WTF did I just read "Guys let's use sex apps as proof women are ugly. Then let's tie it to politics somehow so I can sprinkle in my ignorant take". LOL -- Here's my mostly-serious take on the situation. Most women (hot OR ugly) are liberal and most trump-supporters are middle aged white dudes. When you wear one of those red hats you can figure out which of those 2 groups will be more impressed haha the new liberal woman...who still has a penis btw. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 5, 2023 Share Posted April 5, 2023 21 minutes ago, aristocrat said: the new liberal woman...who still has a penis btw. You can't keep your eyes off that bulk, can you? Of course we'll hold it against you! 😆 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 26 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: You can't keep your eyes off that bulk, can you? Of course we'll hold it against you! 😆 It's too old for you, Lincoln Project supporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 11 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Right after your wife had a kid. The ends to which they defend this scum never cease to amaze. But a lot of these guys don't even like him..... Can't even tell the truth to themselves. Please don't tell me Democrats are now concerned about politicians screwing around on their spouses. Come on man. For Democrats the list is really long too. JFK John Edwards (his wife had cancer) Gary Hart Bubba FDR Eliot Spitzer Steven Horsford Jim McGreevy Anthony Weiner .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SydneyBillsFan Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 6 hours ago, Warcodered said: Doesn't sound like he's giving a legal opinion, he's going full conspiracy, unless he for some reason thinks it'll be easier for Trump to win an appeal which is generally the opposite of how that goes. He was on Fox yesterday, said that no NY judge would be brave enough to be the one who set Trump free, or words to that effect. That and a majority blue jury. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: never let reality get in the way of a good meme. I mean the issue everyone is actually going on about is how it's being elevated to a felony, the falsifying records thing comes off as almost a conceded point the way they talk about it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 8 hours ago, B-Man said: This is just sad 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 9 hours ago, Warcodered said: never let reality get in the way of a good meme. I mean the issue everyone is actually going on about is how it's being elevated to a felony, the falsifying records thing comes off as almost a conceded point the way they talk about it. Agreed. It is basically uncontested (at least in all the pronouncements from Trump and his team) that he did falsify records. I’ll repeat my take: - this prosecution is unwise for many reasons - nonetheless, it is pretty clear that Trump violated NY law - whether it is chargeable as a felony based on campaign finance laws depends on unresolved issues of NY criminal law and on issues of federal supremacy (also an open issue) - whether it is chargeable as a felony based on anticipated NY state tax fraud depends on issues of fact that will be difficult to prove - there is a difference between an ill advised prosecution (this one) and an unfair prosecution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 22 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Agreed. It is basically uncontested (at least in all the pronouncements from Trump and his team) that he did falsify records. I’ll repeat my take: - this prosecution is unwise for many reasons - nonetheless, it is pretty clear that Trump violated NY law - whether it is chargeable as a felony based on campaign finance laws depends on unresolved issues of NY criminal law and on issues of federal supremacy (also an open issue) - whether it is chargeable as a felony based on anticipated NY state tax fraud depends on issues of fact that will be difficult to prove - there is a difference between an ill advised prosecution (this one) and an unfair prosecution This also underscores that the Dems, or Deep State, or (((Soros))), or whoever, aren’t pulling the strings in the Manhattan DA. If this was part of a coordinated effort (instead of separate sovereigns making their own decisions), Bragg wouldn’t have charged until after Smith or Willis had indicted Trump. They have much stronger cases that would have driven worse headlines for Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 12 Anti-Trump Pundits And Lawmakers Who Think Bragg’s Case Is Terrible by Jordan Boyd For weeks now, former President Donald Trump and legal experts on the right predicted that the prosecution Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg brought against Trump was pathetic and partisan. Not long after Trump pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records during his arraignment on Tuesday, some of his most outspoken political enemies also began casting doubt on Bragg’s attempts to send the former president to jail. Here are the notorious anti-Trumpers who willingly admitted that Bragg’s case against the leader of the Republican Party is a weak attempt to keep him from winning the White House in 2024. https://thefederalist.com/2023/04/05/12-anti-trump-pundits-and-lawmakers-who-think-braggs-case-is-terrible/ . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenhigh Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 Just now, ChiGoose said: This also underscores that the Dems, or Deep State, or (((Soros))), or whoever, aren’t pulling the strings in the Manhattan DA. If this was part of a coordinated effort (instead of separate sovereigns making their own decisions), Bragg wouldn’t have charged until after Smith or Willis had indicted Trump. They have much stronger cases that would have driven worse headlines for Trump. That's probably how it looks to you, Chi, because you refuse to ever see any malice on the left, only benign incompetence. To many it looks more like the English forcing the charge of the Irish conscripts before the heavy cavalry enters the fray. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 1 hour ago, SUNY_amherst said: jeez trump is NOT well. He might not survive to make it to the 2024 election. fat, sweaty and un-well in that video from tuesday another commie cultist alt. lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 6, 2023 Share Posted April 6, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 7, 2023 Share Posted April 7, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 7, 2023 Share Posted April 7, 2023 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: Assuming this is true, I mean $15 is some serious walking around money. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts