Roundybout Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: I love the simps for Biden that are like yeah we know Biden has passed some of the most destructive policies in us history, took bribes, corrupt, mentally unfit for office but trump took some docs that had no real significance. Realize where we are Don’t do crimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Just now, Roundybout said: Don’t do crimes. Tell that to the bidens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Kemp said: Did you answer whether Trump should be prosecuted in there in some sort of code? I’m sorry about your inability to pay attention to detail but that’s not on me. I’m not used to playing middle school games with grown men (apologies for assuming gender) so I will bow out now. Hopefully you will have an hour or two this afternoon without the orange menace foremost in your mind. All my best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 9 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t do crimes. Thank you for proving my point. Realize where we are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 51 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Societally speaking, justice was served. From the perspective of family and friends of the victims, it was not. Sadly, that happens everyday. Absent recognition that it’s an imperfect system and bias, emotion, theatrics, interpretation of law and occasional animus factor into it all, you end up with Kempian logic, where one-sided dialogue rules, you’re worried about nazi’s hidden behind the mail box and the thinking the only case with a poor outcome involved as former Rb for the SF 49ers. well, ok then. You changed my mind on virtually everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Westside said: I just love how you twist like a pretzel to defend your guy. You’re not a serious ( or mentally competent) person. Lots of rationalization of inconsistent application of the law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 26 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: well, ok then. You changed my mind on virtually everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 25 minutes ago, Pokebball said: Lots of rationalization of inconsistent application of the law. It’s actually a pretty consistent application of the law if you actually look at the facts and apply them to the law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: It’s actually a pretty consistent application of the law if you actually look at the facts and apply them to the law. Not when you consider all of the instances, beginning with Clinton. I know you believe so. But it really isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Pokebball said: Not when you consider all of the instances, beginning with Clinton. I know you believe so. But it really isn't. Actually it is when you consider all of the instances, even beginning with Clinton. That is, if you actually read the investigation findings instead of listening to people who maybe don’t have the best reasons to be truthful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4043338-senate-gop-leaders-break-with-house-on-trump-indictment/ I'd put my money on the Senators. “Most Republicans want somebody else, even Trump people want somebody else, because they want to win and they recognize Trump is incapable of winning a general election at this point,” Gregg said. He said Senate Republican leaders should call on the GOP to move past the former president. “I would be advising them to say, ‘Listen, we have to move on as a party. Let Donald Trump work through his legal issues, which are considerable, but we as a party need to move on and let’s find ourselves a candidate for president who can win,’” he said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on Friday evening said the charges brought by the Department of Justice are “quite serious and cannot be casually dismissed.” Edited June 11, 2023 by redtail hawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: Actually it is when you consider all of the instances, even beginning with Clinton. That is, if you actually read the investigation findings instead of listening to people who maybe don’t have the best reasons to be truthful. I disagree 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 If even half of it is true, then he's toast. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 6 hours ago, Westside said: I just love how you twist like a pretzel to defend your guy. You’re not a serious ( or mentally competent) person. Where's the twist? Lol! There's not enough evidence. Explain that because it seems pretty plain. May not be right, May not be fair.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 8 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Where's the twist? Lol! There's not enough evidence. Explain that because it seems pretty plain. May not be right, May not be fair.... He was a SENATOR when he stole the classified documents. By law, which you love to quote, he has no right to possess any documents, classified or not! Intent doesn’t matter. He never should of had them! Pretty simple to understand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Westside said: He was a SENATOR when he stole the classified documents. By law, which you love to quote, he has no right to possess any documents, classified or not! Intent doesn’t matter. He never should of had them! Pretty simple to understand Saying something is one thing. Proving it beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law is another. Edited June 11, 2023 by ChiGoose 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 11, 2023 Share Posted June 11, 2023 14 minutes ago, Westside said: He was a SENATOR when he stole the classified documents. By law, which you love to quote, he has no right to possess any documents, classified or not! Intent doesn’t matter. He never should of had them! Pretty simple to understand And then when told to turn them in, he hid them, had people lie for him, and refused to turn in all the docs, right? Oh wait, that was Trump and not Biden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts