Jump to content

Republican George Santos aka "Anthony Devolder" He Was Given Committee Assignments?????


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

A veteran has alleged that Santos pocketed thousands in donations meant for his dying service dog. (Santos denies that.) There has also been reporting into whether a Santos aide impersonated a McCarthy aide, and whether Santos used a fake Jewish name, to raise money.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/01/19/democratic-challenge-mccarthy-deals/

 

Oh dear 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I reasoned that if the party was to attract women voters, that that nonsense could not be let go. A friend of mine, also a Democrat, strongly disagreed with me 

Did you feel the same way about Bill Clinton?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

You are defending this guy, huh? 

 

You are cool with this guy being a normal part of the GOP. 

 

Awesome, such integrity 

 

 

No.

 

You misread my post (per usual)

 

I am objecting to "trial by media "  (for anyone)

 

If you are going to respond with such nonsense  (I called him a lying fool for God sakes)

 

I would politely ask that you just ignore my posts.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.

 

You misread my post (per usual)

 

I am objecting to "trial by media "  (for anyone)

 

If you are going to respond with such nonsense  (I called him a lying fool for God sakes)

 

I would politely ask that you just ignore my posts.

 

 

 

You are defending him. Twist all you want, but you were defending those moral puke 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Albwan said:

The title changes are truly manic.

They are not replying to their own comments.

 

they are not using several profiles to create narratives and try to attack who they disagree with.

 

They are at no time some troll farm or a troll with a bunch of sock puppets.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.

 

You misread my post (per usual)

 

I am objecting to "trial by media "  (for anyone)

 

If you are going to respond with such nonsense  (I called him a lying fool for God sakes)

 

I would politely ask that you just ignore my posts.

 

 

 


Should they not report about him?  Just stick to the laptop?  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, Santos can’t be removed from Congress. There’s no authority for that. We get it. 
But his party doesn’t need to treat him like a regular old candidate who puffed up his own credentials. I guess they can continue to count on him voting the party line, but he doesn’t need to have committee assignments, and he really shouldn’t have anyone defending him or comparing his preposterous (really, compulsive) lying to that of the garden variety politician. Trump, Biden, Bill Clinton all told whoppers, but this guy is a whole different animal. A difference of kind, not of degree. A complete fool who ought to be shunned by all. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Look, Santos can’t be removed from Congress. There’s no authority for that. We get it. 
But his party doesn’t need to treat him like a regular old candidate who puffed up his own credentials. I guess they can continue to count on him voting the party line, but he doesn’t need to have committee assignments, and he really shouldn’t have anyone defending him or comparing his preposterous (really, compulsive) lying to that of the garden variety politician. Trump, Biden, Bill Clinton all told whoppers, but this guy is a whole different animal. A difference of kind, not of degree. A complete fool who ought to be shunned by all. 


Anything to own the libs.

 

It’s such a winning strategy…. Americans are tired of the BS.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Funny article. . . . . . . . . . . . with a good point about the hypocrisy seen here.

 

 

George Santos: Legend

Kurt Schlichter |

 

Let’s make no mistake – perhaps the most important and consequential Republican of the current era is one George Santos. AKA Anthony Devolder. AKA drag queen Kitara Ravache. He is an absolute hero, and he has done more for the cause of conservatism than a thousand GOP suits parroting Cato Institute and/or Chamber of Commerce clichés.


Sure, he has a track record of shocking scams, scores and shenanigans that would make a lesser man (assuming that’s how he’s identifying this week) blush. Not George – perhaps the greatest politician to bear that first name since the father of our country. No, in spite of his controversies and creative CV, he ran for a Democrat-leaning seat and he won. He fooled them all. Way to go, George, if that is your real name.

 

Naturally, the Democrats are in a tizzy over the recent revelations about his unusual past. Aided by the regime media, they are demanding that he resign his seat, which means a special election and a likely replacement by some pinko communist. A few Fredocons are joining in the chorus, but our boy George is hanging tough, to quote New Kids on the Block, of which I am pretty sure George will be shown to have once claimed to have been a founding member.

 

 

The Old Rules were pretty clear. As a politician, you were pretty much expected to be a dishonest schmuck. You just had to portray yourself as not being one, and you had to hide your lies, dissembling, and corruption sufficiently to create an air of deniability. We all knew they were rotten. They just had to have the decency to not rub their rottenness in our faces and we could all go on pretending that the sordid business of politics was not really that sordid.

 

Under the Old Rules, George Santos would be hounded out of office at the first major scandal revelation. But the Old Rules have been replaced. See, the Old Rules would have required the Democrats to police their own at the cost of a short-term political loss – though not much of one, since their most vivid villains come from deep blue states that happily re-elect their own bad guys. Let’s review the rogues gallery of dirtbags whose retention led to the New Rules that keep George Santos a congressman…

 

There’s Dick Blumenthal, the hero of the Tet Offensive. He was never near Vietnam, but that did not stop him from preening about like a war hero. He’s from Connecticut, and the Connecticutters did not mind. Back to the Senate goes Fauxdi Murphy!

 

In the nearby pseudo-state of Rhode Island is Sheldon Whitehouse. He allegedly belongs to an all-white beach club. But that’s cool with his Democrat constituents. Back to the Senate he goes to pontificate about white supremacy, of which he is an expert.

 

Let’s go across the fruited plain to California, where Eric Swalwell allegedly bared his Fang Fangs. He’s still in Congress, though not on the Intel Committee anymore.

 

California Senator Feinstein had a Chinese spy for a driver for two decades, but she can plead lack of intent on account of the fact that she is totally senile. 

 

Heading back, let’s stop in Minnesota to attend Ilhan Omar’s combination wedding anniversary and family reunion.

 

Then on to New Jersey to visit Senator Menendez. You don’t even want to know what that guy is into, though the feds keep trying (not very hard) to find out.

 

And then back up north again to say “How” to Senate squaw Elizabeth Warren. Actually, for Massachusetts, reelecting a fake Indian is nothing. For decades they reelected Ted Kennedy and he killed a chick.

 

So please, tell us more about how George Santos is diminishing the awesome credibility of our Congress. Explain how his presence lessens the mighty moral firepower these solons wield. Enlighten us on why this petty chiseler and idiosyncratic LGBTQA+%^b>?]&G trendsetter – hilariously, one accusation is that he is faking being gay – is unfit to sit among the rest of the perverts, bunko artists, and fabulists in Congress. Frankly, the addition of George Santos to the 534 other legislators probably raises their average decency.

 

{snip}

 

George Santos is a potent middle finger in the face of our enemies. We are not going to apply one set of rules to ourselves that helps Democrats while the Democrats apply another set of rules to themselves that helps Democrats. The age of sap Republicans is over. And if you want to go back to the Old Rules, we’ll know it when we see Blumenthal doing the duffle bag drag and Warren walking off into the sunset down the trail of tears.

 

 

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2023/01/30/george-santos-legend-n2618820

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2023 at 9:43 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Funny article. . . . . . . . . . . . with a good point about the hypocrisy seen here.

 

 

George Santos: Legend

Kurt Schlichter |

 

Let’s make no mistake – perhaps the most important and consequential Republican of the current era is one George Santos. AKA Anthony Devolder. AKA drag queen Kitara Ravache. He is an absolute hero, and he has done more for the cause of conservatism than a thousand GOP suits parroting Cato Institute and/or Chamber of Commerce clichés.


Sure, he has a track record of shocking scams, scores and shenanigans that would make a lesser man (assuming that’s how he’s identifying this week) blush. Not George – perhaps the greatest politician to bear that first name since the father of our country. No, in spite of his controversies and creative CV, he ran for a Democrat-leaning seat and he won. He fooled them all. Way to go, George, if that is your real name.

 

Naturally, the Democrats are in a tizzy over the recent revelations about his unusual past. Aided by the regime media, they are demanding that he resign his seat, which means a special election and a likely replacement by some pinko communist. A few Fredocons are joining in the chorus, but our boy George is hanging tough, to quote New Kids on the Block, of which I am pretty sure George will be shown to have once claimed to have been a founding member.

 

 

The Old Rules were pretty clear. As a politician, you were pretty much expected to be a dishonest schmuck. You just had to portray yourself as not being one, and you had to hide your lies, dissembling, and corruption sufficiently to create an air of deniability. We all knew they were rotten. They just had to have the decency to not rub their rottenness in our faces and we could all go on pretending that the sordid business of politics was not really that sordid.

 

Under the Old Rules, George Santos would be hounded out of office at the first major scandal revelation. But the Old Rules have been replaced. See, the Old Rules would have required the Democrats to police their own at the cost of a short-term political loss – though not much of one, since their most vivid villains come from deep blue states that happily re-elect their own bad guys. Let’s review the rogues gallery of dirtbags whose retention led to the New Rules that keep George Santos a congressman…

 

There’s Dick Blumenthal, the hero of the Tet Offensive. He was never near Vietnam, but that did not stop him from preening about like a war hero. He’s from Connecticut, and the Connecticutters did not mind. Back to the Senate goes Fauxdi Murphy!

 

In the nearby pseudo-state of Rhode Island is Sheldon Whitehouse. He allegedly belongs to an all-white beach club. But that’s cool with his Democrat constituents. Back to the Senate he goes to pontificate about white supremacy, of which he is an expert.

 

Let’s go across the fruited plain to California, where Eric Swalwell allegedly bared his Fang Fangs. He’s still in Congress, though not on the Intel Committee anymore.

 

California Senator Feinstein had a Chinese spy for a driver for two decades, but she can plead lack of intent on account of the fact that she is totally senile. 

 

Heading back, let’s stop in Minnesota to attend Ilhan Omar’s combination wedding anniversary and family reunion.

 

Then on to New Jersey to visit Senator Menendez. You don’t even want to know what that guy is into, though the feds keep trying (not very hard) to find out.

 

And then back up north again to say “How” to Senate squaw Elizabeth Warren. Actually, for Massachusetts, reelecting a fake Indian is nothing. For decades they reelected Ted Kennedy and he killed a chick.

 

So please, tell us more about how George Santos is diminishing the awesome credibility of our Congress. Explain how his presence lessens the mighty moral firepower these solons wield. Enlighten us on why this petty chiseler and idiosyncratic LGBTQA+%^b>?]&G trendsetter – hilariously, one accusation is that he is faking being gay – is unfit to sit among the rest of the perverts, bunko artists, and fabulists in Congress. Frankly, the addition of George Santos to the 534 other legislators probably raises their average decency.

 

{snip}

 

George Santos is a potent middle finger in the face of our enemies. We are not going to apply one set of rules to ourselves that helps Democrats while the Democrats apply another set of rules to themselves that helps Democrats. The age of sap Republicans is over. And if you want to go back to the Old Rules, we’ll know it when we see Blumenthal doing the duffle bag drag and Warren walking off into the sunset down the trail of tears.

 

 

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2023/01/30/george-santos-legend-n2618820


Meanwhile most republicans can’t stand this guy.   What an article!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Are you using his affinity for drag to make fun of him? Very difficult to see how this post could be anything else. Seems a little phobic. 


According to republicans, he’s a pedophile child groomer now. Sorry, I don’t make the rules. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2023 at 5:02 PM, Roundybout said:


According to republicans, he’s a pedophile child groomer now. Sorry, I don’t make the rules. 

Apparently you dont understand the rules either.  That or he was in the weirdest looking elementary school I have ever seen, seemingly late at night too.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

Apparently you dont understand the rules either.  That or he was in the weirdest looking elementary school I have ever seen, seemingly late at night too.


Haven’t you heard? All drag queens are pedophiles who run a trafficking ring under a pizzeria. Republicans told me so. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2023 at 5:15 PM, JDHillFan said:

Better to own what you posted than be disingenuous about it. Doesn’t even fool the Tiberius or Roundy’s of the world. Pitiful. 

 

Of, it's funny AF because of the knots I get to watch the good Christian Republicans twist themselves into now.

 

But I do think he looks happy in that video, and less of a joke than he is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republican 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/02/10/george-santos-amish-puppies/

YORK COUNTY, Pa. — It was after dark when George A. Santos approached the farmer in Pennsylvania’s Amish country looking to buy at least eight puppies.

He promised a wire transfer of more than $5,000 but it never appeared, the farmer said in an interview. He said Santos ended up writing a smaller check — and driving off with four golden retrievers.

“Something inside me said I just cannot trust him,” the farmer told The Washington Post, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect his privacy.

The check bounced.

The farmer, who has not previously spoken to the media, said he called police following the encounter in 2017. It took nearly two years for the authorities to locate Santos back home in New York, but he was eventually charged with theft by deception, according to a brief mention in The Star, a local newspaper in York County. In May 2021, the paper reported, the case was dismissed under a provision of Pennsylvania law that allows misdemeanor charges to be dropped when a prosecutor consents and “satisfaction has been made to the aggrieved person.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/15/nyregion/george-santos-marriage-immigration.html

 

Just as I called it about a month ago. Gay man marrying a foreign woman typically indicates immigration fraud. 
If investigations show that that is likely what happened, will THAT finally be enough for the Republican power brokers to call for this fool’s resignation? Will ANYTHING be enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...