Which offense will be impacted more by wet conditions? [snip]

[Royale with Cheese]

We obviously throw the ball a lot and the Ravens are currently 26th in passing attempts.  Surprisingly they are 19th in rushing attempts.  Seems like they're a big play offense and not manufacturing long drives down the field.  

 

I would guess we would have a similar strategy as the Rams game with getting the ball out quick...not throwing as much down the field.

 

What do you guys think?

[Draconator]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:04 PM, Royale with Cheese said:

What do you guys think?

Expand  

The way you matriculate long thread titles down the field is a safe way to win games.

[blitzboy54]

We have a Viking, Colossus, Super Man for a quarterback. I think this favors us. We will be able to throw more effectively than they will   

[Buffalo_Stampede]

No more long thread titles.

 

 I think speed is weakened on a wet field. I would say advantage Buffalo. 
 

Allen’s fumbling has become a problem again though so it’s a wash.

Edited September 29, 2022 by Buffalo_Stampede

[SoCal Deek]

That forecast doesn’t sound all that bad to me. What am I missing here? 

[Low Positive]

A 1/4 inch of rain is just a light rain if it is a steady rain. And those are gusts of 10-20 mph, not a steady wind. If we lose this game, I don’t think it will be the weather. Just don’t leave it up to a FG.

[Greg S]

Allen was able to throw the ball just fine in that "wind game" vs NE last year. 10-20 MPH isn't that bad. As for the rain that would probably hurt LJ more with his running in slippery conditions. Even though it will hurt Allen's running he is a better passer than LJ. He doesn't rely on the run as much as LJ does.

[Fan in Chicago]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:04 PM, Royale with Cheese said:

We obviously throw the ball a lot and the Ravens are currently 26th in passing attempts.  Surprisingly they are 19th in rushing attempts.  Seems like they're a big play offense and not manufacturing long drives down the field.  

 

I would guess we would have a similar strategy as the Rams game with getting the ball out quick...not throwing as much down the field.

 

What do you guys think?

Expand  

Are you competing with @chris hefffor longest post title?

Titles should be exactly that and not a synopsis of the thread

[BarleyNY]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:12 PM, FrenchConnection said:

A 1/4 inch of rain is just a light rain if it is a steady rain. And those are gusts of 10-20 mph, not a steady wind. If we lose this game, I don’t think it will be the weather. Just don’t leave it up to a FG.

Expand  

I agree. It’s probably not going to be bad enough to impact the game. If it does I’d say advantage Bills. Specifically if Lamar can’t make his usual cuts and if it eliminates RBs from making cutbacks it’s a big advantage to Buffalo. I don’t know that it’ll be enough rain for that tho. 

[Franco_92]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:09 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

No more long thread titles.

 

 I think speed is weakened on a wet field. I would say advantage Buffalo. 
 

Allen’s fumbling has become a problem again though so it’s a wash.

Expand  

Allen's fumbling is a problem when he's dropping it while running. I don't think that's happened once this year. He lost the ball on a blind side strip sack during which any qb in the league fumbles, he was cocking his arm to throw.

[eball]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:09 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Allen’s fumbling has become a problem again

Expand  

It has? Because of one blind side sack?

 

[Greg S]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:12 PM, FrenchConnection said:

A 1/4 inch of rain is just a light rain if it is a steady rain. And those are gusts of 10-20 mph, not a steady wind. If we lose this game, I don’t think it will be the weather. Just don’t leave it up to a FG.

Expand  

 

Since this is the Bills we are talking about make sure its a 2 score game by the time we get to the 4th quarter. We all know how those one score games go

Edited September 29, 2022 by Greg S

[Walking Tall]

The title of the thread took up the whole first page.

[Buffalo_Stampede]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:29 PM, eball said:

It has? Because of one blind side sack?

 

Expand  

He had 3 fumbles. 

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:27 PM, arcane said:

Allen's fumbling is a problem when he's dropping it while running. I don't think that's happened once this year. He lost the ball on a blind side strip sack during which any qb in the league fumbles, he was cocking his arm to throw.

Expand  

He’s a known fumbler. 

[ProcessYaDigg]

Field conditions for Sunday.

 

There, i fixed the title for you.

[eball]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:34 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He had 3 fumbles. 

 

Expand  

 

Excuse me?  If you are blaming either the bad snap at the end of the 1st half or the ball that slipped out of his hand on 4th down as being indicative of a "fumbling problem" then I'm not sure you know what you're watching.

 

[Realist]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:09 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

No more long thread titles.

 

 I think speed is weakened on a wet field. I would say advantage Buffalo. 
 

Allen’s fumbling has become a problem again though so it’s a wash.

Expand  

So we're all of a sudden back to 2018 because of a blind side sack and 2 back up centers?

[MJS]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:12 PM, SoCal Deek said:

That forecast doesn’t sound all that bad to me. What am I missing here? 

Expand  

20 mile per hour winds is a lot.

[H2o]

I get tired of reading these "War and Peace" titles

[chris heff]

  On 9/29/2022 at 1:20 PM, Fan in Chicago said:

Are you competing with @chris hefffor longest post title?

Titles should be exactly that and not a synopsis of the thread

Expand  

My title was meant as a joke, prior to my post there were a couple of very verbose titles.